Garfie |
16-10-2024 12:31 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn.
(Post 11530767)
That was a load of crap too. He was talking about making it fair and not wanting to mess with the houses decision so put up Martha who I don’t think anyone even nominated.
Don’t put someone up then dismiss it like you’re trying to play fair when it’s not fair. Just own it.
|
The truth is though, he was in a lose/lose situation, and neither of his options were good. He didn’t choose to put an extra housemate up for eviction - he was forced into doing it as part of a task. How can he play fair when the task he had been given to do was never going to be fair? Whoever he nominated was going to be upset, so he couldn’t win! He was put in an impossible position.
He clearly explained the very logical process he had gone through to show how he had come to his decision - there are 15 housemates, so after taking away those who were already nominated or immune, he was left with 11 to choose from. He wanted to avoid those who were up for eviction the previous week, so that removed another 3 housemates, leaving him with 8 to choose between. He chose to take into account those who had spent the most time in storage, so that probably eliminated another 3 or 4 housemates, leaving him 4 or 5 to choose from. He then wanted to save the people he was closest to, so let’s that was 3 or 4. After that he would only have been left with 1 or 2 people, and obviously Martha was amongst those last few. He wasn’t aware of the fact she’d had no nominations, as he was only informed of the 3 who were up for eviction.
The process showed he had been considerate and had tried to do it as fairly and logically as possible. He did then add he thought it was fair, but that came across as if he was referring to how he had come about his decision, rather than the fact that Martha was up for eviction.
If you feel he was so unfair, how would you have made the decision, what would have been your thought process, and what choice do you feel would have been fairer?
|