ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB9 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=99)
-   -   Rachel: Big Brother's Rachel Unveils Her new Sexy Look. (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=71207)

Dal1966 16-09-2008 08:16 PM

I prefer her natural look.
However she still looks good.

XxShortyxX 16-09-2008 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Billy21
Quote:

Originally posted by XxShortyxX
Rachel was never fake in the house or out of the house, unlike other HM's, Rachel has even taken the time to post on her facebook group, to thank everyone for their support.

Luke/Bex ARE so desprate for fame, more so then anyone else. Rachel has only done about two interviews for two magas, she does want to go back to teaching, there is nothing wrong with her doing this photoshoot, has she got her boobies out? no, is she showing everything off? no.

Rachel is gorgeous and looks so sexy, because she is natually good looknig with out even trying, she is what a call a real women, something a lot of girls/women out there are not, they need loads and loads of make-up to look good, where's Rachel doesn't.

Lmao you are sucha hyprocrite. You spent the whole season moaning about people voting for Dale and Stu because their looks since they are dull "eyecandy", whereas you done the exact same with Rachel, lmao it's hilarious


You know nothing, yes Rachel is a very good looking women, but that's not why I voted for her to win, I have liked Rachel from day 1, as soon as I saw her VT, because she is just so nomaral, and a lovely girl, there are a million reasons why I voted for her to win, but I did not vote for her because she is fit, I am not shallow. Rachel is the best HM this year, along with Kat/Sara. The rest are nasty, bitchy or just plain horrible people who I didn't like, therefore I would not vote for them to win.

Dal1966 16-09-2008 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by XxShortyxX
Quote:

Originally posted by Billy21
Quote:

Originally posted by XxShortyxX
Rachel was never fake in the house or out of the house, unlike other HM's, Rachel has even taken the time to post on her facebook group, to thank everyone for their support.

Luke/Bex ARE so desprate for fame, more so then anyone else. Rachel has only done about two interviews for two magas, she does want to go back to teaching, there is nothing wrong with her doing this photoshoot, has she got her boobies out? no, is she showing everything off? no.

Rachel is gorgeous and looks so sexy, because she is natually good looknig with out even trying, she is what a call a real women, something a lot of girls/women out there are not, they need loads and loads of make-up to look good, where's Rachel doesn't.

Lmao you are sucha hyprocrite. You spent the whole season moaning about people voting for Dale and Stu because their looks since they are dull "eyecandy", whereas you done the exact same with Rachel, lmao it's hilarious


You know nothing, yes Rachel is a very good looking women, but that's not why I voted for her to win, I have liked Rachel from day 1, as soon as I saw her VT, because she is just so nomaral, and a lovely girl, there are a million reasons why I voted for her to win, but I did not vote for her because she is fit, I am not shallow. Rachel is the best HM this year, along with Kat/Sara. The rest are nasty, bitchy or just plain horrible people who I didn't like, therefore I would not vote for them to win.
I totally agree.

For me it has got absolutely nothing to do with looks who i want to win. I vote for who i feel deserves to win, it's as simple as that.

That's why voted for Rachel.

XxShortyxX 16-09-2008 08:25 PM

Exactly Dal1966, if Rachel looked like Bex I would have still voted for her to win, looks have nothing to do with it, I am not shallow.

Xander 16-09-2008 08:44 PM

She doesn't look great when she's all glammed up like that, she looks much better all natural with hardly andy makeup on. I hardly even recognize her in those pictures.

bee-ash 16-09-2008 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Princess
And I hear she was releasing a perfume? Yeah whatever with the only interview.


Urgh,why does she have to be in my bible?? I'm so writing to heat again.
what a loser!


i saw a pic of you on that "meet the member" thing
talking of hypocryt! -.-

Billy 16-09-2008 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by XxShortyxX
Quote:

Originally posted by Billy21
Quote:

Originally posted by XxShortyxX
Rachel was never fake in the house or out of the house, unlike other HM's, Rachel has even taken the time to post on her facebook group, to thank everyone for their support.

Luke/Bex ARE so desprate for fame, more so then anyone else. Rachel has only done about two interviews for two magas, she does want to go back to teaching, there is nothing wrong with her doing this photoshoot, has she got her boobies out? no, is she showing everything off? no.

Rachel is gorgeous and looks so sexy, because she is natually good looknig with out even trying, she is what a call a real women, something a lot of girls/women out there are not, they need loads and loads of make-up to look good, where's Rachel doesn't.

Lmao you are sucha hyprocrite. You spent the whole season moaning about people voting for Dale and Stu because their looks since they are dull "eyecandy", whereas you done the exact same with Rachel, lmao it's hilarious


You know nothing, yes Rachel is a very good looking women, but that's not why I voted for her to win, I have liked Rachel from day 1, as soon as I saw her VT, because she is just so nomaral, and a lovely girl, there are a million reasons why I voted for her to win, but I did not vote for her because she is fit, I am not shallow. Rachel is the best HM this year, along with Kat/Sara. The rest are nasty, bitchy or just plain horrible people who I didn't like, therefore I would not vote for them to win.

Your still a hypocrite. People could say the same about Dale, but you still insisted on calling him "dull" and exclaiming the only way people voted was cos he was fit etc etc.

bee-ash 16-09-2008 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by XxShortyxX
Exactly Dal1966, if Rachel looked like Bex I would have still voted for her to win, looks have nothing to do with it, I am not shallow.
exactly...
if rachel was as ugly as rebecca thingy
she would be my winner....

but whats good bout rachel is that she looks good in/out

bee-ash 16-09-2008 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Billy21
Quote:

Originally posted by XxShortyxX
Quote:

Originally posted by Billy21
Quote:

Originally posted by XxShortyxX
Rachel was never fake in the house or out of the house, unlike other HM's, Rachel has even taken the time to post on her facebook group, to thank everyone for their support.

Luke/Bex ARE so desprate for fame, more so then anyone else. Rachel has only done about two interviews for two magas, she does want to go back to teaching, there is nothing wrong with her doing this photoshoot, has she got her boobies out? no, is she showing everything off? no.

Rachel is gorgeous and looks so sexy, because she is natually good looknig with out even trying, she is what a call a real women, something a lot of girls/women out there are not, they need loads and loads of make-up to look good, where's Rachel doesn't.

Lmao you are sucha hyprocrite. You spent the whole season moaning about people voting for Dale and Stu because their looks since they are dull "eyecandy", whereas you done the exact same with Rachel, lmao it's hilarious


You know nothing, yes Rachel is a very good looking women, but that's not why I voted for her to win, I have liked Rachel from day 1, as soon as I saw her VT, because she is just so nomaral, and a lovely girl, there are a million reasons why I voted for her to win, but I did not vote for her because she is fit, I am not shallow. Rachel is the best HM this year, along with Kat/Sara. The rest are nasty, bitchy or just plain horrible people who I didn't like, therefore I would not vote for them to win.

Your still a hypocrite. People could say the same about Dale, but you still insisted on calling him "dull" and exclaiming the only way people voted was cos he was fit etc etc.
true though......

hes not a good person!

theres nothing in him
only looks -.-

Markymark 16-09-2008 11:28 PM

Eyecandy? Don't talk rubbish, if anything being a good looking girl makes you less likely to win. If Dale hadn't been such an rude, ignorant, fanny-nailing berk I think he would've won.

ange7 17-09-2008 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by XxShortyxX
I have no links of Rachel giving half her money away, the fact she has said this twice now, once on live TV and once in an interview. At the end of the day it's her money, she can do what she likes with it.
We've been over this 3 times....Yes she can do what she likes!!! ... BUT she said she would give it to charity ... she went around saying " ooh look at me , I care, I'm giving money to charity" and everyone patted her on the back "well done!". So now it is not a case of "she can do what she likes with it" at all xxshortyxx. She said she would...she hasn't.

YOU said Rachel HAS given half her money away. FACT

You based this on 2 interviews Rachel gave where she said I will in the FUTURE give 10000 away.
How did 10000 become 50000
how did "in the future" become "has already"

Your a liar and very loose with the truth. You bend and twist the truth to strengthen your own VERY WEAK argument.

You've been caught out LYING!!!!! just like Robb

XxShortyxX 17-09-2008 10:24 AM

How am I lying! and really, what do you care if she gives the money away to charity or not, you don't even like the girl! So don't be so rude, I don't have to prove anything to you, she said she would give half her money away, I believe her.

XxShortyxX 17-09-2008 10:27 AM

Your still a hypocrite. People could say the same about Dale, but you still insisted on calling him "dull" and exclaiming the only way people voted was cos he was fit etc etc. [/quote]



I am not a hypocrote, the differetns is with Dale is there is notihng to like about him, but his body, e.g his looks, that's all he has, he was very boring and dull in the house, he had no storyline, nothing, all he did was moan, say he wanted to leave, that's boring.

With Rachel it was different, she wanted to be there and have fun, she is very likeable, it's not my fault if I find her acttrative, but she had the nice personality to go with her looks, something alot of good looknig people don't have, e.g Dale/Stu/Jen ect.

And when you read comments on forums, from 13/14/15/16 year old school girls, who can't see past looks, it kind of gives it away they are only like him for his looks.

ange7 17-09-2008 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by XxShortyxX
How am I lying! and really, what do you care if she gives the money away to charity or not, you don't even like the girl! So don't be so rude, I don't have to prove anything to you, she said she would give half her money away, I believe her.
"How am I lying! and really"
God ...I've answered this 4 times now... what's wrong with you?
You said Rachel had given away half her money. You said it to back up your argument above how sweet and giving she is. I asked you if she really gave 50% of her cash away...you said yes. Now it turns out that not only hasn't she given 50000 away she hasn't given 10000 away. Your a liar. That's why! GET IT!!. You tried to back up a very weak argument with lies... and it's blown up in your face. Try to big enough and say "yes I'm a liar!" hehe

"what do you care if she gives the money away to charity or not, you don't even like the girl!"
Answered this twice already. Honestly...what's wrong with you?
She can do what she likes with the cash!!. But she had 2 interviews where she said she would give 10000 away. Everybody applauded, patted her on the back, people in forums said "see!. see!...how great she is!!". Once she gets all those pats on the back from everybody then she OUGHT to do it... she ought to follow through on her words!!. The fact that she has not shows how 2 faced she is. And if tomorrow she does give 10000 away...well... your still a liar hehe!!

"So don't be so rude"
I've only called you a liar. Is calling you a liar rude?... or the truth?:xyxwave:

NettoSuperstar! 17-09-2008 12:41 PM

Hmmmm Sara in nuts or Rachels new look? lmao

XxShortyxX 17-09-2008 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ange7
Quote:

Originally posted by XxShortyxX
How am I lying! and really, what do you care if she gives the money away to charity or not, you don't even like the girl! So don't be so rude, I don't have to prove anything to you, she said she would give half her money away, I believe her.
"How am I lying! and really"
God ...I've answered this 4 times now... what's wrong with you?
You said Rachel had given away half her money. You said it to back up your argument above how sweet and giving she is. I asked you if she really gave 50% of her cash away...you said yes. Now it turns out that not only hasn't she given 50000 away she hasn't given 10000 away. Your a liar. That's why! GET IT!!. You tried to back up a very weak argument with lies... and it's blown up in your face. Try to big enough and say "yes I'm a liar!" hehe

"what do you care if she gives the money away to charity or not, you don't even like the girl!"
Answered this twice already. Honestly...what's wrong with you?
She can do what she likes with the cash!!. But she had 2 interviews where she said she would give 10000 away. Everybody applauded, patted her on the back, people in forums said "see!. see!...how great she is!!". Once she gets all those pats on the back from everybody then she OUGHT to do it... she ought to follow through on her words!!. The fact that she has not shows how 2 faced she is. And if tomorrow she does give 10000 away...well... your still a liar hehe!!

"So don't be so rude"
I've only called you a liar. Is calling you a liar rude?... or the truth?:xyxwave:


You seem to be so obsessed with what Rachel/says ect. She said she would give some money away to charity, I believe her, why would she lie? and the fact is how do you know she hasn't given any of her money away? like I said, you don't liek her, yet you post about her, so you can't dislike her that much. I have no lie, I was telling you what I heard/read, end of.

XxShortyxX 17-09-2008 01:49 PM

Oh and Billy21 I seem to remember you postd in Rachel's apprecation thread a few weeks back, saying postive stuff about her, now all of a sudden you don't like her, saying she is boring ect. I don't get it? You say I am a hypocrite.

robb 17-09-2008 04:24 PM

Rachel's 'look' is transitory.............sara I'm afraid just looks like another tart.

NettoSuperstar! 17-09-2008 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by robb
Rachel's 'look' is transitory.............sara I'm afraid just looks like another tart.
transitory hmm yeh her ass looks like a ford transit! but lets face it guys who would get the pulse racing here?

robb 17-09-2008 04:26 PM

Wot's the big deal over this charity thing............she said she'd give 10,000 away over 5 charities.............that's 2 grand each. And blimey, give her chance to get the cheque fromm BB!!! :conf:

robb 17-09-2008 04:28 PM

Yeah but her ass is still smaller than sara's nose...airbrush or no airbrush.......

XxShortyxX 17-09-2008 04:42 PM

Lol some people are obsessed with Rachel's bum :laugh: her bum is very nice, I like real women, she is one.

Indierock&roll 17-09-2008 05:13 PM

doesnt look like her one bit..

XxShortyxX 17-09-2008 05:15 PM

it is Rachel, she comfirmed it on her Fcebook Group. As did her brother.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.