ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB10 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=128)
-   -   *Video* Last Nights Row (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=110198)

Enid 13-08-2009 12:15 PM

Argh brilliant! Thanks. Gonna be watching this with my tea. :thumbs:

shash 13-08-2009 12:17 PM

"Just go away and let me be positive" :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: classic!

Enid 13-08-2009 12:19 PM

Watching part 1, at around what time does the arguing begin?

BB22 13-08-2009 12:19 PM

Interesting footage.

It looks to me as if Marcus had no intention of getting into any kind of row with Bea. The conversation kind of ebbed of its own accord in a certain direction and Marcus started telling Bea a few home truths. Pretty much everything Marcus told her was justified.

The row itself, if you can call it that, was a real rope-a-dope from Marcus. He was just lying back, fairly relaxed, making one or two comments and letting Bea punch herself out, sending the occasional riposte back at her. It wasn't so much Marcus trying to "defeat" her. He just let herself work herself up into a kind of frenzy.

This incident really provides more evidence to back up my assessment of Bea. She strikes me as someone who has coasted through life with nobody telling her she was doing anything wrong, ever. And now she is here in a completely different environment with some people who are not just going to roll over and let her have her way and she simply cannot handle it. Hence all this talk about how shocked and "upset" she is when someone even hints that she may not be a little rainbow in everyone's dreary lives.

shash 13-08-2009 12:20 PM

Thanks again for this, Mickey2009 ... +karma for you :thumbs:

tintedshadow 13-08-2009 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
I'm not showing any bias in my question.... it's a valid point. Freddie shouldn't have bothered exchanging words with Charlie when it was perfectly clear that it wasn't necessary in this case to involve himself in the argument.

I never drew a comparison between the differing sides; it's a pointless exercise considering that I never suggested that one was worse than the other.

My whole reason for commenting is that Marcus' had told Bea that she shouldn't involve Freddie in their argument. It would have been far more prudent for him to just lie back in his bed and smile over the whole spectacle. No value in going out there.
brother im haven't questioned the validity of what you have said,nor have i stated that you were being bias in any way.infact i see the point your making..

fact remains,while i agree freddie shouldn't have got involved,he found something bea had said as hypocritic so he laughed... now while we can agree there may have been "no value for him going out there" you do realise if that was the reason he stayed out of it,that would be game playing?

so he stayed quiet until charlie got on his back,had that been me i think i would've had to move to him myself,charlies only reason for what he said to freddie was based on knowing how weak freddie is when it comes to settling disputes..

furthermore,charlie didnt see it as ganging up when him and kris had that game of hide and seek with freddie and picked him apart day by day...

anyways brother i understood and agree with what your saying.. so im not sure why you think i was challenging you but lets leave it there as i have to get going anyway...

setanta 13-08-2009 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tintedshadow
Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
I'm not showing any bias in my question.... it's a valid point. Freddie shouldn't have bothered exchanging words with Charlie when it was perfectly clear that it wasn't necessary in this case to involve himself in the argument.

I never drew a comparison between the differing sides; it's a pointless exercise considering that I never suggested that one was worse than the other.

My whole reason for commenting is that Marcus' had told Bea that she shouldn't involve Freddie in their argument. It would have been far more prudent for him to just lie back in his bed and smile over the whole spectacle. No value in going out there.
brother im haven't questioned the validity of what you have said,nor have i stated that you were being bias in any way.infact i see the point your making..

fact remains,while i agree freddie shouldn't have got involved,he found something bea had said as hypocritic so he laughed... now while we can agree there may have been "no value of him going out there" you do realise if that was the reason he stayed out of it,that would be game playing?

so he stayed quite until charlie got on his back,had that been me i think i would've had to move to him myself,charlies only reason for what he said to freddie was based on knowing how weak freddie is when it comes to settling desputes..

furthermore,charlie didnt see it as ganging up when him and kris had that game of hide and seek with freddie and picked him apart day by day...

anyways brother i understood and agree with what your saying.. so im not sure why you think i was challenging you but lets leave it there as i have to get going anyway...
But you didn't read my question properly. I stated that Charlie had an agenda and I called it an attack - I wasn't asking you to compare and contrast everyone. My question was why Freddie had to get involved.

Sure you could hear him talking in the bedroom about it prior to coming out; his words carried into the living room on a number of occassions. As far as I'm concerned there was no value in involving himself in their argument-so yes, on those grounds it was a silly move.

BB22 13-08-2009 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tintedshadow
Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
I'm not showing any bias in my question.... it's a valid point. Freddie shouldn't have bothered exchanging words with Charlie when it was perfectly clear that it wasn't necessary in this case to involve himself in the argument.

I never drew a comparison between the differing sides; it's a pointless exercise considering that I never suggested that one was worse than the other.

My whole reason for commenting is that Marcus' had told Bea that she shouldn't involve Freddie in their argument. It would have been far more prudent for him to just lie back in his bed and smile over the whole spectacle. No value in going out there.
brother im haven't questioned the validity of what you have said,nor have i stated that you were being bias in any way.infact i see the point your making..

fact remains,while i agree freddie shouldn't have got involved,he found something bea had said as hypocritic so he laughed... now while we can agree there may have been "no value for him going out there" you do realise if that was the reason he stayed out of it,that would be game playing?

so he stayed quiet until charlie got on his back,had that been me i think i would've had to move to him myself,charlies only reason for what he said to freddie was based on knowing how weak freddie is when it comes to settling disputes..

furthermore,charlie didnt see it as ganging up when him and kris had that game of hide and seek with freddie and picked him apart day by day...

anyways brother i understood and agree with what your saying.. so im not sure why you think i was challenging you but lets leave it there as i have to get going anyway...
Apparently, Bea had told him off for his reaction the previous night, accused him of "having a tantrum" and said she would never react like that. That certainly helps explain Freddie's strangled laugh.

SDAS 13-08-2009 12:36 PM

I wish BB would show Charlie when Bea was venting her spleen(sorry having her opinion) about Lisa and then David, she was horrible about them both

tintedshadow 13-08-2009 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by halfacrown
Exactly! Why has Freddie got to do what other people tell him and why has he got to be a punch bag in order for people to like him? Charlie's behaviour was disgusting and I would have liked Marcus to have said something to him, even if it was after Freddie went to bed.
agreed,charlie seemed to think he was justified calling freddie out,saying what he had to say then dismissing him, charlie was right the night he told freddie of his scheming and plotting theory..

however tonight was just a quick squirmish to tenderise freddie's ego,to top it off he seemed to think wailing "just leave her alone,you got up to argue with her just leave her alone" constantly when it seemed freddie came out to speak to charlie to address the accusation of ganging up on bea..

the thing with this is,charlie may have played apart in this,but when he is evicted his interview will consist of davina gossiping as to the status of his relationship with rodders.. no mention of this shoddy treatment of freddie at any point i gaurantee..

ElProximo 13-08-2009 12:42 PM

Charlie just owned that entire situation.
Up till now I have had little interest in him other than enjoying some laughs when him and Rodrigo have fights,
but,
Wow. Charlie just came up massive and simply owned that entire night so skillfully, so honestly and his 'undressing' of Freddy has got to be one of the greatest moments of the week!

Marcus gets credit for knowing better than to push a hysterical devil-woman and was as meek as possible despite constantly wanting to veer off about his greatness,
and,
Bea is just an astonishing force of nature/ carnival nightmare / devil-child,
and,
Freddy (who was really the 'fish' to be reeled in by Beazulbub) is possibly the most annoying retarded bad dream,
but,,
Wow.. just massive new admiration for Charlie!
Simply owned that entire situation and handled it with total excellence!

Huge thanks for posting the links - Wow.. I remembered how exciting live-feed really is heh.

tintedshadow 13-08-2009 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
But you didn't read my question properly. I stated that Charlie had an agenda and I called it an attack - I wasn't asking you to compare and contrast everyone. My question was why Freddie had to get involved.

Sure you could hear him talking in the bedroom about it prior to coming out; his words carried into the living room on a number of occassions. As far as I'm concerned there was no value in involving himself in their argument-so yes, on those grounds it was a silly move.
i didnt read your question properly?are you joking?actually dont worry..lets make this simple king..

i agree with you,you are right..

and i was not accusing you of bias,i have read back my post to see why you would think i was calling you out for doing so,and the only mention in my post was this "i hope this gets shown with no bias on tonights highlight show" .. i was not refering to you brother..

you raised a good point with it being a silly move on freddies part..perhaps we just have a slightly diffrent take on things,so i shall agree to disagree..


gone

Enid 13-08-2009 12:43 PM

Bea is really ugly when she "cries"...

halfacrown 13-08-2009 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tintedshadow
Quote:

Originally posted by halfacrown
Exactly! Why has Freddie got to do what other people tell him and why has he got to be a punch bag in order for people to like him? Charlie's behaviour was disgusting and I would have liked Marcus to have said something to him, even if it was after Freddie went to bed.
agreed,charlie seemed to think he was justified calling freddie out,saying what he had to say then dismissing him, charlie was right the night he told freddie of his scheming and plotting theory..

however tonight was just a quick squirmish to tenderise freddie's ego,to top it off he seemed to think wailing "just leave her alone,you got up to argue with her just leave her alone" constantly when it seemed freddie came out to speak to charlie to address the accusation of ganging up on bea..

the thing with this is,charlie may have played apart in this,but when he is evicted his interview will consist of davina gossiping as to the status of his relationship with rodders.. no mention of this shoddy treatment of freddie at any point i gaurantee..
And Charlie is so out to win. He sees Freddie as a rival but his attacked are having the reverse effect to what he wants: Freddie grow in popularity when he's the underdog.

The scenario you describe with Davina is accurate and depressing.

delta 13-08-2009 12:46 PM

Charlie knows Freddie is popular and is desperate to win the show that is why at every opportunity he has a pop at Freddie, not saying that some of it is not justified, but the guy is an opportunist.

The other thing, does the **** draw a breath?


As for the arguement, gotta agree with the other poster who likened it to the rope-a-dope, yeah, she defeated herself, with the seed firmly planted that she will be disliked immensely on the outside, her paranoia is only going to get worse. Bea is a very unstable human being.

It was okay for her to tear Freddie to shreds the night previous, but when she gets a mild dose of her own medicine, it's VICTIM time.


I do hope they allow flour and eggs in to her eviction.

setanta 13-08-2009 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tintedshadow
Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
But you didn't read my question properly. I stated that Charlie had an agenda and I called it an attack - I wasn't asking you to compare and contrast everyone. My question was why Freddie had to get involved.

Sure you could hear him talking in the bedroom about it prior to coming out; his words carried into the living room on a number of occassions. As far as I'm concerned there was no value in involving himself in their argument-so yes, on those grounds it was a silly move.
i didnt read your question properly?are you joking?actually dont worry..lets make this simple king..

i agree with you,you are right..

and i was not accusing you of bias,i have read back my post to see why you would think i was calling you out for doing so,and the only mention in my post was this "i hope this gets shown with no bias on tonights highlight show" .. i was not refering to you brother..

you raised a good point with it being a silly move on freddies part..perhaps we just have a slightly diffrent take on things,so i shall agree to disagree..


gone
You were accusing me of bias from your tone and your defense of Freddie-referring to situations that had taken place over a month ago, along with examples from last night, to cement your claims- when I had never even suggested that one side was better or worse than the other.

tintedshadow 13-08-2009 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ElProximo
Charlie just owned that entire situation.
Up till now I have had little interest in him other than enjoying some laughs when him and Rodrigo have fights,
but,
Wow. Charlie just came up massive and simply owned that entire night so skillfully, so honestly and his 'undressing' of Freddy has got to be one of the greatest moments of the week!

Marcus gets credit for knowing better than to push a hysterical devil-woman and was as meek as possible despite constantly wanting to veer off about his greatness,
and,
Bea is just an astonishing force of nature/ carnival nightmare / devil-child,
and,
Freddy (who was really the 'fish' to be reeled in by Beazulbub) is possibly the most annoying retarded bad dream,
but,,
Wow.. just massive new admiration for Charlie!
Simply owned that entire situation and handled it with total excellence!

Huge thanks for posting the links - Wow.. I remembered how exciting live-feed really is heh.
lol your enthusiasm is compelling,but charlie owned the night?skillfully?honestly?
we may just be watching diffrent feeds,from where i sat i saw a very hyper ignorant twenty something guy mincing around attention whoring himself for the viewing public while doing nothing productive in the process..

my personal opinion is marcus handled bea with utmost care and respect and still managed to articulate his thoughts without so much of a raised voice or a curse word.. for me.. marcus owned the little witch of ellstreet.

tintedshadow 13-08-2009 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
Quote:

Originally posted by tintedshadow
Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
But you didn't read my question properly. I stated that Charlie had an agenda and I called it an attack - I wasn't asking you to compare and contrast everyone. My question was why Freddie had to get involved.

Sure you could hear him talking in the bedroom about it prior to coming out; his words carried into the living room on a number of occassions. As far as I'm concerned there was no value in involving himself in their argument-so yes, on those grounds it was a silly move.
i didnt read your question properly?are you joking?actually dont worry..lets make this simple king..

i agree with you,you are right..

and i was not accusing you of bias,i have read back my post to see why you would think i was calling you out for doing so,and the only mention in my post was this "i hope this gets shown with no bias on tonights highlight show" .. i was not refering to you brother..

you raised a good point with it being a silly move on freddies part..perhaps we just have a slightly diffrent take on things,so i shall agree to disagree..


gone
You were accusing me of bias from your tone and your defense of Freddie-referring to situations that had taken place over a month ago, along with examples from last night, to cement your claims- when I had never even suggested that one side was better or worse than the other.
okay lets just assume im not a liar or scared to tell you what i really feel?lets further assume we may not see eye to eye but if i disagree with you i am within my rights to do so right?

now forgive me for being blunt... but king.. i have agreed for the most part with everything you have said,and let me make this clear,I WAS NOT ACCUSING YOU OF FCK ALL..so kindly brother quit trolling as i do not wish to curse in my post again..

if i thought you were being bias,i would've said..i did not,so you can assume,that i was not accusing you of such a thing unless i say otherwise..

once again...





gone

Enid 13-08-2009 12:56 PM

Okay, so so far from what I've seen of the fight, Marcus says she is negative, Bea is saying she's not (when she clearly is) and Charlie is being a brown-noser and this should be his queue to bugger off somewhere else now. I thought it was hilarious when Freddie taunted her from the bedroom and Charlie decided to be the "big man". Has he forgotten what that bitch did to him the other day??

She's been crying for a good while but I've yet to see any tears. She is so ****ing hypocritical, she described Freddie's panic attack or whatever it was as a tantrum, but look at her now. She's gone off in a huff simply because Marcus did not back down and it is clear she's not getting her own way on this one, but she is expecting sympathy and Charlie is giving it to her. FÚCK OFF CHARLIE!!!

sophie1955 13-08-2009 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Indierock&roll
i think freddie is definatly going now :sad:
I feel, although I like freddie and Marcus, it would be best for Freddie to go i think, because they will just make mince of him if Marcus goes, and could even turn to Freddie having enough and just leaving. :sad:

BB22 13-08-2009 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Enid
Okay, so so far from what I've seen of the fight, Marcus says she is negative, Bea is saying she's not (when she clearly is) and Charlie is being a brown-noser and this should be his queue to bugger off somewhere else now. I thought it was hilarious when Freddie taunted her from the bedroom and Charlie decided to be the "big man". Has he forgotten what that bitch did to him the other day??

She's been crying for a good while but I've yet to see any tears. She is so ****ing hypocritical, she described Freddie's panic attack or whatever it was as a tantrum, but look at her now. She's gone off in a huff simply because Marcus did not back down and it is clear she's not getting her own way on this one, but she is expecting sympathy and Charlie is giving it to her. FÚCK OFF CHARLIE!!!
And Marcus was so relaxed about it all. I think he was watching in bemusement as she worked herself up into a frenzy over it.

Faded 13-08-2009 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BB22
Quote:

Originally posted by Enid
Okay, so so far from what I've seen of the fight, Marcus says she is negative, Bea is saying she's not (when she clearly is) and Charlie is being a brown-noser and this should be his queue to bugger off somewhere else now. I thought it was hilarious when Freddie taunted her from the bedroom and Charlie decided to be the "big man". Has he forgotten what that bitch did to him the other day??

She's been crying for a good while but I've yet to see any tears. She is so ****ing hypocritical, she described Freddie's panic attack or whatever it was as a tantrum, but look at her now. She's gone off in a huff simply because Marcus did not back down and it is clear she's not getting her own way on this one, but she is expecting sympathy and Charlie is giving it to her. FÚCK OFF CHARLIE!!!
And Marcus was so relaxed about it all. I think he was watching in bemusement as she worked herself up into a frenzy over it.
Never been a huge fan of Marcus but that's always one thing I've liked about him he never seems to get heated and lose his cool while trying to talk to someone even if the other person is having a real go.

setanta 13-08-2009 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tintedshadow
Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
Quote:

Originally posted by tintedshadow
Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
But you didn't read my question properly. I stated that Charlie had an agenda and I called it an attack - I wasn't asking you to compare and contrast everyone. My question was why Freddie had to get involved.

Sure you could hear him talking in the bedroom about it prior to coming out; his words carried into the living room on a number of occassions. As far as I'm concerned there was no value in involving himself in their argument-so yes, on those grounds it was a silly move.
i didnt read your question properly?are you joking?actually dont worry..lets make this simple king..

i agree with you,you are right..

and i was not accusing you of bias,i have read back my post to see why you would think i was calling you out for doing so,and the only mention in my post was this "i hope this gets shown with no bias on tonights highlight show" .. i was not refering to you brother..

you raised a good point with it being a silly move on freddies part..perhaps we just have a slightly diffrent take on things,so i shall agree to disagree..


gone
You were accusing me of bias from your tone and your defense of Freddie-referring to situations that had taken place over a month ago, along with examples from last night, to cement your claims- when I had never even suggested that one side was better or worse than the other.
okay lets just assume im not a liar or scared to tell you what i really feel?lets further assume we may not see eye to eye but if i disagree with you i am within my rights to?

now forgive me for being blunt... but king.. i have agreed for the most part with everything you have said,and let me make this clear,I WAS NOT ACCUSING YOU OF FCK ALL..so kindly brother quit trolling as i do not wish to curse in my post again..

if i thought you were being bias,i would've said..i did not,so you can assume,that i was not accusing you of such a thing unless i say otherwise..

once again...
gone
But you obviously didn't read the question I posted intitially; instead you decided to air your own views on the entire topic rather than deal with what I had stated. Don't you see the silliness of that? Why feel the need to give me your interpretation of what transpired when I never said that Charlie was justified in his actions, or that Freddie was abominable?

When you did mention Freddie it was by comparing him to Charlie and Bea which, again, wasn't related to my original question. You also said I was being mean and that it was a knee jerk reaction on my part.... what reaction? What meaness? I was just talking about Freddie in this particular moment, where I do believe he involved himself in an argument that wasn't his own.

I just don't understand the reasoning behind your digressions when I had not asked for them and had really just posed a very innocent and straightforward question, with no trace of bias or aggression.

setanta 13-08-2009 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tintedshadow
Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
Quote:

Originally posted by tintedshadow
Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
But you didn't read my question properly. I stated that Charlie had an agenda and I called it an attack - I wasn't asking you to compare and contrast everyone. My question was why Freddie had to get involved.

Sure you could hear him talking in the bedroom about it prior to coming out; his words carried into the living room on a number of occassions. As far as I'm concerned there was no value in involving himself in their argument-so yes, on those grounds it was a silly move.
i didnt read your question properly?are you joking?actually dont worry..lets make this simple king..

i agree with you,you are right..

and i was not accusing you of bias,i have read back my post to see why you would think i was calling you out for doing so,and the only mention in my post was this "i hope this gets shown with no bias on tonights highlight show" .. i was not refering to you brother..

you raised a good point with it being a silly move on freddies part..perhaps we just have a slightly diffrent take on things,so i shall agree to disagree..


gone
You were accusing me of bias from your tone and your defense of Freddie-referring to situations that had taken place over a month ago, along with examples from last night, to cement your claims- when I had never even suggested that one side was better or worse than the other.
okay lets just assume im not a liar or scared to tell you what i really feel?lets further assume we may not see eye to eye but if i disagree with you i am within my rights to?

now forgive me for being blunt... but king.. i have agreed for the most part with everything you have said,and let me make this clear,I WAS NOT ACCUSING YOU OF FCK ALL..so kindly brother quit trolling as i do not wish to curse in my post again..

if i thought you were being bias,i would've said..i did not,so you can assume,that i was not accusing you of such a thing unless i say otherwise..

once again...
gone
But you obviously didn't read the question I posted intitially; instead you decided to air your own views on the entire topic rather than deal with what I had stated. Don't you see the silliness of that? Why feel the need to give me your interpretation of what transpired when I never said that Charlie was justified in his actions, or that Freddie was abominable?

When you did mention Freddie it was by comparing him to Charlie and Bea which, again, wasn't related to my original question. You also said I was being mean and that it was a knee jerk reaction on my part.... what reaction? What meaness? I was just talking about Freddie in this particular moment, where I do believe he involved himself in an argument that wasn't his own.

I just don't understand the reasoning behind your digressions when I had not asked for them and had really just posed a very innocent and straightforward question, with no trace of bias or aggression.

Jack_ 13-08-2009 01:10 PM

Right just watched most of it and she is a fucking nasty vile cunt. Sorry, but anyone that supports her is a vile human being.

She deserves to get beaten up when she comes out, she's that fucking evil.

sophie1955 13-08-2009 01:13 PM

Jack, i feel your frustration, but thats a little strong, I don't like the witch at all, i'm just hoping she don't get any money out of this, because she sure don't deserve anything. Thing is she is going to be in the final week which is :mad:

Faded 13-08-2009 01:14 PM

No idea how someone could be that much of a hypocrite, it was fine for her to destroy Freddie about the exact same thing but when it happens to her she's being bullied.

Blink_Me 13-08-2009 01:18 PM

At the end of the day, she started the argument by talking bad about Freddie. She called him a tool and twat during that argument; Freddie wasn't even there to defend himself during when she said that, so she got everything she deserved in my opinion.

tintedshadow 13-08-2009 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
But you obviously didn't read the question I posted intitially; instead you decided to air your own views on the entire topic rather than deal with what I had stated. Don't you see the silliness of that? Why feel the need to give me your interpretation of what transpired when I never said that Charlie was justified in his actions, or that Freddie was abominable?

When you did mention Freddie it was by comparing him to Charlie and Bea which, again, wasn't related to my original question. You also said I was being mean and that it was a knee jerk reaction on my part.... what reaction? What meaness? I was just talking about Freddie in this particular moment, where I do believe he involved himself in an argument that wasn't his own.

I just don't understand the reasoning behind your digressions when I had not asked for them and had really just posed a very innocent and straightforward question, with no trace of bias or aggression.
brother you had this issue with me before,not watching a vt you had begged me too,whats it to you?you asked a question,and i read it,however your post was not towards me so i did not feel the need to answer it..

lol ill give you this one for free.. i was refering to charlie having a go at freddie based on his reaction,i was not calling you out as being mean to freddie lmao .. i understand why you may think i was refering to you..

but be clear,as i will not be exchanging wittisms with you in future,my reply to you was in no way meant to frustrate or rile you,infact i agreed with you and simply added a few of my own thoughts..

furthermore,my "tone" in any of my posts were not in any way trying to acuse you of bias.. take what im saying on face value and not on your interpretations of my posts in future..

Chuckyegg 13-08-2009 01:19 PM

freddie is a d/ck for obvious reasons

sophie1955 13-08-2009 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Chuckyegg
freddie is a d/ck for obvious reasons
there not obvious to me???:shrug:

setanta 13-08-2009 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tintedshadow
Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
But you obviously didn't read the question I posted intitially; instead you decided to air your own views on the entire topic rather than deal with what I had stated. Don't you see the silliness of that? Why feel the need to give me your interpretation of what transpired when I never said that Charlie was justified in his actions, or that Freddie was abominable?

When you did mention Freddie it was by comparing him to Charlie and Bea which, again, wasn't related to my original question. You also said I was being mean and that it was a knee jerk reaction on my part.... what reaction? What meaness? I was just talking about Freddie in this particular moment, where I do believe he involved himself in an argument that wasn't his own.

I just don't understand the reasoning behind your digressions when I had not asked for them and had really just posed a very innocent and straightforward question, with no trace of bias or aggression.
brother you had this issue with me before,not watching a vt you had begged me too,whats it to you?you asked a question,and i read it,however your post was not towards me so i did not feel the need to answer it..

lol ill give you this one for free.. i was refering to charlie having a go at freddie based on his reaction,i was not calling you out as being mean to freddie lmao .. i understand why you may think i was refering to you..

but be clear,as i will not be exchanging wittisms with you in future,my reply to you was in no way meant to frustrate or rile you,infact i agreed with you and simply added a few of my own thoughts..

furthermore,my "tone" in any of my posts were not in any way trying to acuse you of bias.. take what im saying on face value and not on your interpretations of my posts in future..
Ah come on Tinted, you meant that my jumping at his knee jerk reaction was mean and then you impressed upon me that his response was nothing compared to the sh£te that Bea and Charlie have been doing throughout the show.

And yeah, you never did watch the vt.

sophie1955 13-08-2009 01:31 PM

setanta , are you related to Bea?? :whistle:

setanta 13-08-2009 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sophie1955
setanta , are you related to Bea?? :whistle:
Lol, I hate the woman why?

tintedshadow 13-08-2009 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
Quote:

Originally posted by tintedshadow
Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
But you obviously didn't read the question I posted intitially; instead you decided to air your own views on the entire topic rather than deal with what I had stated. Don't you see the silliness of that? Why feel the need to give me your interpretation of what transpired when I never said that Charlie was justified in his actions, or that Freddie was abominable?

When you did mention Freddie it was by comparing him to Charlie and Bea which, again, wasn't related to my original question. You also said I was being mean and that it was a knee jerk reaction on my part.... what reaction? What meaness? I was just talking about Freddie in this particular moment, where I do believe he involved himself in an argument that wasn't his own.

I just don't understand the reasoning behind your digressions when I had not asked for them and had really just posed a very innocent and straightforward question, with no trace of bias or aggression.
brother you had this issue with me before,not watching a vt you had begged me too,whats it to you?you asked a question,and i read it,however your post was not towards me so i did not feel the need to answer it..

lol ill give you this one for free.. i was refering to charlie having a go at freddie based on his reaction,i was not calling you out as being mean to freddie lmao .. i understand why you may think i was refering to you..

but be clear,as i will not be exchanging wittisms with you in future,my reply to you was in no way meant to frustrate or rile you,infact i agreed with you and simply added a few of my own thoughts..

furthermore,my "tone" in any of my posts were not in any way trying to acuse you of bias.. take what im saying on face value and not on your interpretations of my posts in future..
Ah come on Tinted, you meant that my jumping at his knee jerk reaction was mean and then you impressed upon me that his response was nothing compared to the sh£te that Bea and Charlie have been doing throughout the show.

And yeah, you never did watch the vt.
okay now i have said this once before and shall do so once last time...do not read in to my posts when i am telling you what i meant,theres no need to read between the lines when im being this blunt..

YOU ARE RIGHT,i agree with you.. what i was saying was charlie having a go at freddies knee jerk reaction was mean,that is why freddie was so fired up,nothing more.. do not read in to things anymore king..

im hoping that vt comment was meant in jest,otherwise id be saying brother it really should not be of any concern to you whether i watch noirins vt or not,you have asked others to watch it,and they have,why you feel i must oblige you i dont know,although i explained on many occasions if you wernt trolling i would gladly heed what you had said and watched the vt..

i wont be repeating myself anymore brother as this thread is not about me or your trolling abilities so listen,i was not accusing you of bias in any way,if you saw it that way then i apologise king..

now there really is nothing more to be said..


gone...

sophie1955 13-08-2009 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
Quote:

Originally posted by sophie1955
setanta , are you related to Bea?? :whistle:
Lol, I hate the woman why?
because to never give up :laugh2:

setanta 13-08-2009 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tintedshadow
Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
Quote:

Originally posted by tintedshadow
Quote:

Originally posted by setanta
But you obviously didn't read the question I posted intitially; instead you decided to air your own views on the entire topic rather than deal with what I had stated. Don't you see the silliness of that? Why feel the need to give me your interpretation of what transpired when I never said that Charlie was justified in his actions, or that Freddie was abominable?

When you did mention Freddie it was by comparing him to Charlie and Bea which, again, wasn't related to my original question. You also said I was being mean and that it was a knee jerk reaction on my part.... what reaction? What meaness? I was just talking about Freddie in this particular moment, where I do believe he involved himself in an argument that wasn't his own.

I just don't understand the reasoning behind your digressions when I had not asked for them and had really just posed a very innocent and straightforward question, with no trace of bias or aggression.
brother you had this issue with me before,not watching a vt you had begged me too,whats it to you?you asked a question,and i read it,however your post was not towards me so i did not feel the need to answer it..

lol ill give you this one for free.. i was refering to charlie having a go at freddie based on his reaction,i was not calling you out as being mean to freddie lmao .. i understand why you may think i was refering to you..

but be clear,as i will not be exchanging wittisms with you in future,my reply to you was in no way meant to frustrate or rile you,infact i agreed with you and simply added a few of my own thoughts..

furthermore,my "tone" in any of my posts were not in any way trying to acuse you of bias.. take what im saying on face value and not on your interpretations of my posts in future..
Ah come on Tinted, you meant that my jumping at his knee jerk reaction was mean and then you impressed upon me that his response was nothing compared to the sh£te that Bea and Charlie have been doing throughout the show.

And yeah, you never did watch the vt.
okay now i have said this once before and shall do so once last time...do not read in to my posts when i am telling you what i meant,theres no need to read between the lines when im being this blunt..

YOU ARE RIGHT,i agree with you.. what i was saying was charlie having a go at freddies knee jerk reaction was mean,that is why freddie was so fired up,nothing more.. do not read in to things anymore king..

im hoping that vt comment was meant in jest,otherwise id be saying brother it really should not be of any concern to you whether i watch noirins vt or not,you have asked others to watch it,and they have,why you feel i must oblige you i dont know,although i explained on many occasions if you wernt trolling i would gladly heed what you had said and watched the vt..

i wont be repeating myself anymore brother as this thread is not about me or your trolling abilities so listen,i was not accusing you of bias in any way,if you saw it that way then i apologise king..

now there really is nothing more to be said..


gone...
So if you agree with me why go off and one and defend Freddie by comparing him with Bea? Why the lengthy comment and retorts? And I still think the jumping and mean was in reference to me because of the context of the entire comment you posted.

But anyway, yeah, enough of this.

Mickey2009 13-08-2009 01:53 PM

Not a tear to be seen :whistle:

http://www.vol.nl/images/caps/2009/2...37e2abf2e5.jpg

BB22 13-08-2009 02:01 PM

Ok, the video of this is up on the official site now. Although it obviously only covers a small part of what happened it does give some footage from inside the bedroom which confirms that Freddie was reacting specifically to the "If you can't take it, don't dish it out" comment.

http://www.channel4.com/bigbrother/v...c78115/play.c4

Josy 13-08-2009 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Marcjswp
WTF its weird how she's speaking as if she's crying yet there are no tears in those eyes... hmmmmmm
I agree :thumbs: i was just actually going to post what you did lol

Typical Argument with Bea = She says whatever she likes to you then that stupid oh im going to cry now look appears, her voice rises up a few decibels and she tells you how much you have upset her and how negative you are etc, then it just loops and she spews the same **** over and over again :bored:


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.