ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB13 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=635)
-   -   Bias Anti-Jim episode in Bit of the Psych. (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=245591)

chuff me dizzy 26-01-2014 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 6664476)
Kate Marlow from the panel is a "performance coach"- not sure what that is or why her opinion is more valid than any other voter's, rachel is a psychologist (though she lacks objectivity) and mcgiffin, although I find her quite funny, is only providing her own opinion.

Kate Marlow - "Can I just say that in person, Linda, you are a beautiful and lovely person". This is in no way an objective assessment from a professional perspective as there is no evidence-based scale of loveliness, but a personal opinion.

Rachel (psychologist): "You made outing Jim Davidson as a fraud and a nasty person more important in some ways than playing the game in the house but I think what ended up happening is that you ended up giving Jim exactly what he needed to look like a victim and make you look like a harridan and a nagging b**** and I think that has got him a sympathy vote that he wouldn't have got otherwise. It's not your fault. You tried!" Not objective. Not professional.

This is a panel of individuals as valid in their opinions as any three plucked from the audience or the street. Bit on the psych is an utter fallacy. Three doctors playing table tennis cannot be promoted as a medical drama.

Oh please spare us :shocked:,are the the asparugus lady ?

chuff me dizzy 26-01-2014 07:27 PM

I only asked for a one word answer ,yes or No ,would you have opened a thread calling the experts (in their fields) liars and charlatans if they had said Jim was NOT playing a game, I didnt want a load of copy and paste stuff

optimisticcynic 26-01-2014 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 6664518)
That in no way explains what you said, tell me more about this book you found so facinating....

Wrong person kizzy. I never quoted a book.

GiRTh 26-01-2014 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 6664587)
I only asked for a one word answer ,yes or No ,would you have opened a thread calling the experts (in their fields) liars and charlatans if they had said Jim was NOT playing a game, I didnt want a load of copy and paste stuff

I've answered you.

optimisticcynic 26-01-2014 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 6664575)
Oh please spare us :shocked:,are the the asparugus lady ?

Chuff, I am a psychiatrist with 23yrs experience, a dual-training CCT in Working Age Adult Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, a Masters in Clinical Psychiatry and I treat truly ill people six days a week. I can spot a credible colleague when I see one, and you are not receiving the expert opinions you are being led to believe.

What are your qualifications?

GiRTh 26-01-2014 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 6664623)
Chuff, I am a psychiatrist with 23yrs experience, a dual-training CCT in Working Age Adult Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, a Masters in Clinical Psychiatry and I treat truly ill people six days a week. I can spot a credible colleague when I see one, and you are not receiving the expert opinions you are being led to believe.

What are your qualifications?

Ouch!!!!!

the truth 26-01-2014 07:40 PM

The show is an absolute disgrace....hetrophobia like this will continue to pollute our airwaves and poison the minds of our children until men actually stand up to this mass bigotry and take legal action. its time men bit back through the courts. jim has been slandered by all and sundry knowing they will get away with it. Jim has been an absolute hero and if he were to take legal action for slander and defamy , he would become an even bigger hero

abhorson 26-01-2014 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 6664623)
Chuff, I am a psychiatrist with 23yrs experience, a dual-training CCT in Working Age Adult Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, a Masters in Clinical Psychiatry and I treat truly ill people six days a week. I can spot a credible colleague when I see one, and you are not receiving the expert opinions you are being led to believe.

What are your qualifications?

:joker::joker: That should do it.

Lex 26-01-2014 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 6664623)
Chuff, I am a psychiatrist with 23yrs experience, a dual-training CCT in Working Age Adult Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, a Masters in Clinical Psychiatry and I treat truly ill people six days a week. I can spot a credible colleague when I see one, and you are not receiving the expert opinions you are being led to believe.

What are your qualifications?

Well, i'm no psychiatrist, never have been!...But I do have 84 years worth of general knowledge...and I agree with you that they are there purely for the 'entertainment value', and not to be taken seriously...100% optim...does that count for anything? :spin:

Lex 26-01-2014 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by abhorson (Post 6664661)
:joker::joker: That should do it.

If you believe that...then you don't know Chuff! :joker:

chuff me dizzy 26-01-2014 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 6664623)
Chuff, I am a psychiatrist with 23yrs experience, a dual-training CCT in Working Age Adult Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, a Masters in Clinical Psychiatry and I treat truly ill people six days a week. I can spot a credible colleague when I see one, and you are not receiving the expert opinions you are being led to believe.

What are your qualifications?

Brain surgeon with a degree in spotting bull****

abhorson 26-01-2014 07:48 PM

All through this thread most could see that they were mainly butt licking opinions from the panel but some would argue until the cows come home just for the fun of it.

the truth 26-01-2014 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 6664690)
Brain surgeon with a degree in spotting bull****

chuff you only turned on jim because he dared to stand up to linda and ask if her mindless hatred slander and bullying of him was anything to do with his mate frank carsons dressing room. he had every right to ask this. she had dragged up the past endlessly,, she had defamed jim endlessly , she had brought up the past and her husband and the fact she was a serial cheater, she dragged it all up. what was jim meant to do sit there 24 hours a day and allow her to slander and verbally abuse him? he has his rights and its high time he used those rights to defend himself against false accusation.

optimisticcynic 26-01-2014 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lex (Post 6664674)
Well, i'm no psychiatrist, never have been!...But I do have 84 years worth of general knowledge...and I agree with you that they are there purely for the 'entertainment value', and not to be taken seriously...100% optim...does that count for anything? :spin:

Always happy to learn Lex. Learn more from people than books, though the books have helped. Can't wait to see how tonight unfolds. Am hoping Sam or Ollie go, so Luisa and Jim have time to develop a friendship and Lee and Casey push things even further (should make the end of show party awkward with Linda and Jasmine guaranteed to kick off).

Lex 26-01-2014 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 6664737)
Always happy to learn Lex. Learn more from people than books, though the books have helped. Can't wait to see how tonight unfolds. Am hoping Sam or Ollie go, so Luisa and Jim have time to develop a friendship and Lee and Casey push things even further (should make the end of show party awkward with Linda and Jasmine guaranteed to kick off).

Yep..that would be a great scenario...but I doubt either one of those two are in danger?...my guess would be that the bottom three tonight would be Casey, Lee and Luisa?...but we'll see!...i'm off to watch now, so see you later optim! :thumbs:

optimisticcynic 26-01-2014 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 6664690)
Brain surgeon with a degree in spotting bull****

I can tell from the intellectual content of your posts. Either way, your opinion is as important as mine, so we will remain at odds on this issue. Who are you supporting now Linda's out?

optimisticcynic 26-01-2014 07:55 PM

Later Lex.

smeagol 26-01-2014 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue Cadillac (Post 6662988)
What can we expect with an all female panel and two co-presenters who have auto cues for just about everything they say? The panel are probably burning their bras right now.

not all of them one had a dick

chuff me dizzy 26-01-2014 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the truth (Post 6664725)
chuff you only turned on jim because he dared to stand up to linda and ask if her mindless hatred slander and bullying of him was anything to do with his mate frank carsons dressing room. he had every right to ask this. she had dragged up the past endlessly,, she had defamed jim endlessly , she had brought up the past and her husband and the fact she was a serial cheater, she dragged it all up. what was jim meant to do sit there 24 hours a day and allow her to slander and verbally abuse him? he has his rights and its high time he used those rights to defend himself against false accusation.

Truth my little sunbeam with all due respect :kiss: I didnt like Jim before he went in there ,with me being over 21 (cough) I remember him from the New Faces days when he first came on the scene, never,ever liked him ,and the more I saw and read on him over the years I was at the point of really not liking anything about him ,but I gave him the benefit of the doubt when he went in CBB, Im not sure but I think I even joined his fan club on here, I put to one side the nasty digs he was making to the women(never the men) ,I started to have niggley doubts when Lionel said about him asslicking saying "I will cook, I will wash up ,Do you want a cuppa" but the straw that broke the camels back was the night he brought up Lindas dead husband ,in life there should always be a line you never,ever cross no matter what happens ,but Jim chose to cross that line that night,and went downhill in my opinion from that night on ,and that night I realised I had given the benefit of the doubt wrongly ,he WAS the bastard I already knew he was

chuff me dizzy 26-01-2014 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 6664755)
I can tell from the intellectual content of your posts. Either way, your opinion is as important as mine, so we will remain at odds on this issue. Who are you supporting now Linda's out?

Ive supported Ollie from the start, but I am a MASSIVE Nolans fan love them

Kizzy 26-01-2014 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic (Post 6664589)
Wrong person kizzy. I never quoted a book.

Ah yes sorry, I'm getting confused with all the rhetoric.
Rachel was there to give her professional opinion not a personal one, I feel that is what she did.

chuff me dizzy 26-01-2014 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the truth (Post 6664725)
chuff you only turned on jim because he dared to stand up to linda and ask if her mindless hatred slander and bullying of him was anything to do with his mate frank carsons dressing room. he had every right to ask this. she had dragged up the past endlessly,, she had defamed jim endlessly , she had brought up the past and her husband and the fact she was a serial cheater, she dragged it all up. what was jim meant to do sit there 24 hours a day and allow her to slander and verbally abuse him? he has his rights and its high time he used those rights to defend himself against false accusation.

Just noticed you use the word SLANDER a few times in this ? when did Linda slander him or anyone ?

the truth 26-01-2014 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 6664807)
Truth my little sunbeam with all due respect :kiss: I didnt like Jim before he went in there ,with me being over 21 (cough) I remember him from the New Faces days when he first came on the scene, never,ever liked him ,and the more I saw and read on him over the years I was at the point of really not liking anything about him ,but I gave him the benefit of the doubt when he went in CBB, Im not sure but I think I even joined his fan club on here, I put to one side the nasty digs he was making to the women(never the men) ,I started to have niggley doubts when Lionel said about him asslicking saying "I will cook, I will wash up ,Do you want a cuppa" but the straw that broke the camels back was the night he brought up Lindas dead husband ,in life there should always be a line you never,ever cross no matter what happens ,but Jim chose to cross that line that night,and went downhill in my opinion from that night on ,and that night I realised I had given the benefit of the doubt wrongly ,he WAS the bastard I already knew he was


but she brought him up? again and again? even dhowing off about her cheating on him multiple times and she dragged up the past with jim before they even entered? so isnt she even more guilty of exploiting her dead husband than jim? jim even apologised because he just wanted to move on. he has every right to defend himself. seriously how would you feel in his shoes with linda going at you 24 hours a day on live tv? she even intimated he moved her to self harming? shes a horrible person. surely he had the right to some form of self defenc didnt he?

chuff me dizzy 26-01-2014 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the truth (Post 6664856)
but she brought him up? again and again? even dhowing off about her cheating on him multiple times and she dragged up the past with jim before they even entered? so isnt she even more guilty of exploiting her dead husband than jim? jim even apologised because he just wanted to move on. he has every right to defend himself. seriously how would you feel in his shoes with linda going at you 24 hours a day on live tv? she even intimated he moved her to self harming? shes a horrible person. surely he had the right to some form of self defenc didnt he?

He was face saving ,it was not an apology, he knew hes dropped a clanger when all the women turned against him so tried to kiss ass to stop himself getting nominated ,I doubt very much Linda was serious when she was talking about cheating on her hubby ,but Brian was HER husband ,if she wanted to talk about him ,then who could stop her, but jim went that extra mile in spite Lets agree to disagree ,I hate him and all he stands for ,and you dont

the truth 26-01-2014 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 6664908)
He was face saving ,it was not an apology, he knew hes dropped a clanger when all the women turned against him so tried to kiss ass to stop himself getting nominated ,I doubt very much Linda was serious when she was talking about cheating on her hubby ,but Brian was HER husband ,if she wanted to talk about him ,then who could stop her, but jim went that extra mile in spite Lets agree to disagree ,I hate him and all he stands for ,and you dont

she was using her dead husband to have a go at jim though.....it was clearly the reason she hated jim. yet the truth of the matter is , jim never did any harm to her or her husband. if she wanted her late husbands memory to remain sacred she shouldnt be dragigng up the bitter past and she certainly shouldnt be cackling and celebrating how much she cheated on him. as for jims apology, who is anyon eto say it was false? he was pushed and he reacted and did so perhaps to show linda the man hater, that she cant go around implying he is corrupt or bad or mean and calling him sexist pig endlessly without him eventually biting back. she has no right to slander him
and he tried to get to the truth of why she was doing this. she spinelessly avoided giving him a genuine answer and thought she could milk votes from the man haters. but he called her bluff and asked was it to do with frank caarsons dressing room. he also didnt mention her husband at all. she did every time. then she used tis to drag her husbands name through the mud herself. just to garner votes and support. she is a contemptible sexist pig. she also needs psychiatric help


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.