It isn't a separate subject. It was an incident where Emma earnestly lied to the camera on BOTS, just like she lied here.

Why should I believe her Danny denials if I already saw her lying about Rylan leaving the house?

Where is the evidence that has caught her in a lie?

A tweet from 2012 doesn't cut it I'm afraid.

Is Emma often found being wined and dined by men 10 years younger than her whilst offering them places on BB?
All whilst her husband and kids are waiting at home?

Yes, Aaron's was much more minor. Threatening to slap someone, throwing sandwiches at them etc is far worse than messing about naked like aaron was.

Nobody else in the history of the show has been protected after such violent incidents as danny has.

They are protecting him for some reason. What is it?

I'd much rather have a soggy ham sandwich hit my arm than have some drunken lunatic rub their naked body against me.

But whatever floats your boat.

You are the one claiming he is being protected therefore it is up to you to answer that question.

She has past form for lying. That, combined with Danny openly admitting on his public twitter that he went to dinner with her, proves that she is lying this time.

Are you suggesting Emma doesn't ever lie to the viewers?

I have already answered it. It is in the website in my sig,

I don't know what the argument is about. Danny is friends with ricci and met most of those people through him or because of him, including the "meal" that he had with Emma. (The meal being a wrap up party with 100+ people from riccis series, previous series', production team, hosts and probably some viewers.. It lead Danny to managing to get a quick selfie in). It's a lot of nothing. Danny is just a bit of a fan girl who has one celebrity friend and an active Twitter account. The website is complete rubbish. There are very valid reasons to dislike Danny, this is not one of them.

I have lied previously in my life, does that mean everything I say in future is also a lie? No. :smug:

But you clearly put a lot of stock in Danny's twitter feed so I shall just leave you to it.

Yes, and I've already told you what I think about that. :hee:

Have I any reason to disbelieve Danny's twitter feed? Danny is a bellend but he has never shown form for lying.

Emma has. Emma looked directly on the camera on BOTS and told us that rylan only went to a soundstage next door to the house. She made out that the dissenters were all conspiracy theorists. Yet a tweet proved her a liar.

So in this instance, I believe Danny.

But good decision on quitting while behind. It is always best.:pat:

He denied calling Aisleyne ugly.

He denied shagging Bianca Lake.

He denied being fame hungry.

Just three that spring to mind.

Well at least I am offering something. You point blank refuse to even speculate on why he is being protected.

....because I don't believe he is.

Well done, you're almost computing what is actually being posted. :clap1:

But you said that lying previously in your life doesn't mean you have done it this time.:laugh:

I thought you were leaving me to it anyway?:shrug:

I can only conclude from that, that you are a danny fan.

Yes, clearly I'm a Danny fan.


:joker:

I was responding to you saying he hasn't lied with evidence that he has?

So why does that not put doubt over his claims for you like it does with Emma? :think:
Because it doesn't fit your agenda?

I don't think Emma going to dinner with him three years ago is the only feasible explanation as to why they haven't kicked Danny out of the house. Channel 5 love nastiness, just look at them keeping the likes of Conor and Helen in the house. Look at how they didn't break up the Daley and Hazel incident even though it was blatantly obvious it wasn't going to end well. Look at how practically every single task is designed with causing conflict in mind. The ratings suck, they love controversy, so why not keep him in? They were probably sat backstage praying he WOULD punch Marc in the face so they could make a super dramatic montage of it with Marcus screaming in background in the next highlights episode!!

This is spot on.

The website is just a lame excuse for hatred towards Danny and is looking far too much into things. :joker:

I hope Matt Willis leaves the wench for cavorting with Danny.

Seems like operation yewtree is doing a comeback.
Call the detectives!
https://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com...-channel-5.png
http://i1.mirror.co.uk/incoming/arti...ig-Brother.jpg

How is the website any different to the big "get Marc out campaign" thread on this forum?

Exactly...!!
:clap1:

Oh God, don't remind me of him. ( the top one)

Stop giving it the attention it desires the whole thing is just a windup to get a bite.

I think this website could actually have an effect on thug Danny's chances to win.

Not so much the connections to Emma etc but the tweets section will open a lot of eyes. This site has been posted on DS and will be doing the rounds on Twitter and moronbook.

You might have a point here.

I have said that the connections aren't the most convincing thing on the site. The tweets are.

Danny is a fame ***** and would sell his dying granny to get 5 seconds on TV

Because it's free and takes a lot less effort to post a thread on a forum, whereas it costs money to buy a domain and a lot more effort to construct a website/'gather evidence' to put on said site?

Am I meant to care he's got a few Z List mates?

It wasn't free at all. People boasted about voting multiple times at 50p a go.
They spent far more than the domain for this site cost.

Why? How much was the domain?

Domains are dirt cheap. Mine costs 50p per month.

I didn't say it was different. If this is your campaign to get Danny out then fair play to you. I just think it's a tad weak, based on premise of this thread title anyway. Danny clearly doesn't know these people that well, maybe meeting them once or twice or tweeting them but never actually meeting. Celebrities do that all the time. I think to say he it's fixed for him based on all the brief "connections" is a bit absurd though.

Last year, Zoe used to date Anthony Hutton. Does that mean she was fixed to win because she had a connection? Oh wait. Many housemates have had previous connections before, meting each other at previous auditions and such.

However, I do find his tweets he has made in the past to be vile and horrible. But that has nothing to do with meeting Emma before, or being friends with Victor, or the fact that Emma wants him to win because they are secretly best buds.

Also, Emma was more likely told by her bosses to say that Rylan was near the studios when he left to rehearse to stop conspiracies. I doubt she would have lied on her own accord.

But good luck in your campaign. :)

what a joke lmfao fame wannabe

I have said numerous times that the connections part of the site is the weakest. The tweets are the killer. They make the site worthwhile.

The reason people think there is a fix is because Danny is still there after numerous violent outbursts.

Ok but the premise of this thread is about his connections.

People have had violent outbursts many times in BB. Like Charley throwing water over numerous people in BB8.

The reason Danny hasn't been removed is because he hasn't done anything to warrant removal. Yes, he has got angry and in someone's personal space, but that happens a lot in BB. Nadia/Jason rings a bell.

I would definitely stick to the tweets if you want to get him out. Because the "connections" and the "fix" aren't very strong.

Although, people may rebut that by only judging with what they have seen in the house :shrug:

Can you think of a time that someone has threatened to hit someone and been allowed to stay in?

This whole thread is an embarrassment and quite frankly I'm perplexed by this witch-hunt of Danny of all people. Like, he's one of the most vanilla and bland housemates to ever enter the house...how can he stir up this much hatred in people?

I get the points people are making but still...it's Danny. He's just...there. Even though I've grown to like him now he still just...exists :shrug: there's not really much to him. Of all the housemates that could provoke someone to create a website dedicated to tearing them apart it's one of the most middle of the road characters on a series that barely anyone is watching. I don't know whether it's more hilarious, disturbing or embarrassing. Or all three.