No
she wants his Cock


So its Break out time

Kept doing it
So Ejection - normal.

I agree completly with you...and I am the same..I think all 3 of the previous evictees were good for the show even though I didn't like all of them so much...I think Ryan and Hughie are good housemates but I can't stand em. I thinks Jayne is a good housemate but I really disagree with her past. And I think Alex is prob a nice guy but he should be evicted.

It's a concept not many people believe when it's said but in my case it's true.

I think the thing is for me Jack is that you don't seem to get that some people don't think people like Marc (example) are good for the show, in fact they actively take away because there such domineering unpleasant characters and make people switch off rather than tune in. (I haven't read the rest of this thread so ignore this if it's been asked).

Before anyone took a single one of Jack's posts seriously you should have noted that he has 'Gemma Collins' listed as his BB17 Favourite (and he still enjoys Nikki Graham's Big Brother residency!).

He's not like normal BB viewers. He watches it 'conceptually'.:laugh:

she showed herself to be a vile selfish cow completely at odds with her crafted fake mother earth image

a vile bitch

They should EXTEND IT!!!!

DAMN IT I WAS jUST STARTING TO LIKE HER AND WANTING HER TO WIN

The problem with just evicting wimpy walkers is that some of them are really firey!! and they are in the middle of the best story lines - and they are experiencing something challenging - if they just got evicted, just for asking - you'd have flat liners in there so boring they send you to sleep!!! KARMA EMMA you shoudla known better!!

that should read.....

Emma ejected from bb for NOT having sex with her boyfriend even though BB pushed them into it and forced it onto the viewers, spending a lot of money in the process

Yes she should've been ejected though- I don't disagree with that, what she did was stupid

Urgh all that romancy stuff was puke inducing.

A bit harsh!! but you re so right - it was such a SELFISH thing to do - I liked her so much before that!!

A hippie should think of the good of everyone - she had just spent the night with him!!

Now she gets to see him every night and shes lost the opportunity of a lifetime!! silly silly girl.

As I always say, when you start using the public vote and opinion polls as a barometer of who is and who isn't a good housemate you've made a mistake as the public don't know anything...and no they don't know what they want :laugh:

These are the same people who demand certain housemates are evicted and then complain when the series is boring! They need to be ignored at all costs. Like and dislike housemates all you wish, but the minute you start wanting housemates out who are provoking discussion and inciting reactions in people, regardless of whether it's positive or negative, that needs to be stopped. Because it is better for people to be actively hating on housemates, talking about them, watching to see what they do next, than for the series to be full of 'nice' people who everyone loves and everyone loves each other because the amount of people who want to watch that is very small, whether people realise it or not

It's like killing off all of the main characters in a soap leaving only the extras in, you'd end the show overnight. It is exactly the same with a show like Big Brother, remove the characters and what do you have? Nothing, and people will not watch

Exactly, so thankful there's still people on here who see things this way :clap1:

They may make a few people switch off, but not on the whole. Like I said there are occasions throughout BBUK's history where ratings have declined when a big character has been evicted, and that is because it is casual viewers who need to be chased and not superfans like you and I

Casual fans are fickle, they're like the Facebook cat ladies en masse who will chastise pretty much any housemate who is daring to speak and demand they're evicted, but then will complain the show is boring and won't be watching anymore. They don't consciously know what they want but it's simple, housemates who are provoking a reaction out of viewers (people love to hate don't forget) are good for the show because they get people talking and irate and that's far better than a series full of inoffensive housemates who don't inspire any kind of interest (good or bad) from the casuals. People won't watch if there's nothing to talk about or nothing going on

Gemma Collins was one of the stars or CBB17 so I'm not sure what point you're making and did you even watch the latest season of BBCan? Nikki was one of the main reasons it was so great, and even people who didn't like her that much before agreed

Meh. As long as this is a rule they use in future, I'm fine with this.

And if this means one less housemate being removed at the mass eviction :fc:

Here for Sam being ejected for a smelly fart breaching health and safety

:joker:

This is just conceited and arrogant dude

Youre just presuming your opinion is better than everybody elses... and that was pretty clear in your other posts before you admitted it too.

People dont watch the show the same way you do and you need to acknowledge this and move on instead of lecturing them

They're doing it for the wrong reasons though, they've been lax all season and now they've obviously given her the push for a really weak reason to reduce numbers. They need to be consistent.

I think this is probably the most unworthy ejection EVER in the history of the show. I don't think I'd disagree so much if they didn't let Danniella/Gemma get away with it so much last year but that's obviously because Gemma was their prised possession in the last CBB. It's just so contradictory and C5 should've given her a formal warning at least, I can't even remember Gemma/Danni getting that. I can guarantee if it was Ryan/Hughie walking out the fire exit numerous times they wouldn't even get a formal warning because producers are fapping off to them.

But Gemma and Daniella did it all the time :umm2:

Not really disappointed as Emma was annoying me lately, without her BF >>>

They must view her as a non-essential HM like Gemma/Lisa eta were

http://www.tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv...pes-house.html

So if Ryan breaks out again he'll be ejected?

Fair enough tbh, they should really be ejected if they do that once although that might suck because entertaining people do that and if she escaped without BB doing anything, the same people that are complaining she's gone would probably complain about that.

Who?

That's a shame. I liked her.

How many times did Gemma try to leave last year? And it could be a new thing that if a housemate breaks out once they get a formal warning and twice they're ejected.

I guess if they decided to become more stricter with the breakouts there was always going to be a first victim, in this case it was Emma :(

Severe old school harsh BB and punishments is very welcome but it needs to be fair.
This programme doesn't know how to be consistent with itself.

Marshy. You have your old avatar back. This is good... I approve.

I feel like we don't know everything about what happened, BB have said a lot of rules were broking.

Of course he won't, he's Ryan

Get rid of the alien looking thing, she was boring AF.

Where was the justice when people like Ziggy and John James and Aaron and mother****ing SeeTheCash repeatedly threatened to do this / ACTUALLY ****ING DID THIS

Every time somebody breaks out, everybody says BB shouldn't let them back.

Now that this has actually happened, everyone loses their minds? :shrug:

Of course I think my opinion is right and better than everyone else's, it's my damn opinion :facepalm: I'm so bored of having to say this on here when it's such a stupid argument. It wouldn't be much of an opinion if I didn't believe it were right, would it? What do you want me to do, write 'IMO' at the end of all of my posts? Because me typing something out on a forum should be pretty obvious that it's my opinion

Err...you must've missed my first reply to you where I explicitly said I know people don't watch the show the same as I do:

Oh, and pretty much all of my subsequent replies where I said I'm in the minority these days. People not reading threads properly is another common problem on here

This is a forum, if I disagree with a housemate having fans, disagree that some housemates are entertaining, disagree with the way some people view the show because it's detrimental to its success, I am entitled to say so. That is the point of a forum. No one has to listen, no one has to respond, no one has to agree - and they can say as much. That is also the beauty of a forum. But I will continue to express my opinion because otherwise there wouldn't be much point in me being on here, and that may be what you want but sadly you're going to have to put up with me for the time being

and obviously we're all entitled to having our own opinions but literally coming out and saying that you're doing it for the interest of what's best for the show and we should be thanking you really is something extra.

yes I know, coming from me of all people blah blah blah

That was tongue in cheek if you hadn't noticed but err...I kinda do view the show objectively

And precisely, so why bother commenting? :joker:

Didn't you just say before the whole point of a forum is to comment and discuss, offer different viewpoints then criticise them and discuss why etc.?

Was Macie discussing the series or its housemates or me? There is a difference

If he himself laughed at the idea of calling someone else out for thinking their opinion is right and above everyone else's, I will too because it's absurdly hypocritical. My point being that if he knows this, why bother saying anything?

That's like saying 'well since you know that keeping the biggest contributors in the house is the best thing to do then what's the point commenting on here because you already know what the truth is and shouldn't care about other people's view?' :conf: