she should be shot in the back of her head and her body burned

No doubt she'll appeal ~ i think no show for sentencing should cancel any grounds for appeal for this evil woman.

I agree but I think for cases where multiple crimes were committed like in this case, they should get a sentence for each crime and those sentences should run back to back not at the same time

I have no words.

It's crazy we have a law that says a convicted killer decides to attend court or not.

Madness.

I was spitting feathers when the Judge was talking 'to her' in her absence. Her choice. Who the fook does she think she is!

I agree.

The death sentence should never even be an option unless there's no question of guilt (i.e. caught red handed). For any crime. Trials by jury on balance of evidence are not, have never been and never will be infallible and there are waaay too many documented miscarriages of justice to be killing people based on a jury verdict. You just never hear about most of the overturned convictions. Not juicy enough for the press.

Not making a comment on this case in particular; just the idea of capital punishment vs jury of peers in general.

Put it this way; your jury could be made up of 10 random TiBB members.

F* **.

Chester Hospital:Healthcare worker arrested on suspicion of murdering 8 babies
 

What about those monsters who beheaded one of our soldiers on broad daylight … encouraging passers-by to video their slaughter


The last I heard is that the British taxpayers were paying for their appeal costs !!!

Aghhhhhhh !!!! No

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I think that would surely fall under the category of "caught red handed" ...

I'm against capital punishment in general but LESS against it when there's 100% concrete unquestionable guilt.

"Found guilty on balance of evidence by a jury" is not unquestionable guilt, miscarriages of justice are uncovered regularly, and verdicts are overturned. The justice system is not infallible, and gets it wrong from time to time.

Likewise if we are going to let our authorities end lives, it should at the very least always be for level-headed reasoning (i.e. an individual is simply too dangerous to continue existing safely). Not out of emotion/outrage/anger.

as long as evidence can be faked/planted there is always room for doubt in the process. I know that's extremely unlikely as the police never do anything wrong

The state shouldn't be murdering people, full stop. Matching barbarism with barbarism is revenge, not justice.

So the victims families are distraught as they don’t get to share their victim impact statements as she CHOSE not to attend court !

The judge said that he would pass on their letters to that murdering bitch … you couldn’t make it up !!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

She certainly is the lowest of the low.
However she is likely to have an extremely hard time in prison.

No matter the crimes of murder that other prisoners are in prison for.
Most of them hate with a passion child killers.
It will be arranged that it will be made known what she is in for.
So unless she is watched or confined alone 24/7, she will likely be in terror in prison.

She will be hated, even moreso once it's known it's babies in her care she murdered.

its justice and closure for victims which is the prime motivation, liberal morality signaling is not welcome

also it saves taxpayers millions

It costs far more (many millions in fact) to execute prisoners in the States than to imprison them for life due to the complexity of the appeals process. I would imagine we would have to do the same process as every prisoner has the right to appeal.

then simply dont ape the failed USA system, there is no need to and we are not the USA

enjoy..

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...y-animals.html

Morality signalling?

You're so weird at times, LT. Why is it that you and every other far right loon gets to speak with certainties and conviction, but any one with an opposing view doesn't really believe it and is only signalling?

You've just made those reasons up. It doesn't guarantee closure for any grieving parent, and justice is the prison sentence. Anything more than that is a search for revenge.

30-40 years in prison will be a far greater punishment than a quick russian style bullet to the head

bollocks

if you can't make a point without an insult id wager you dont have one..

Where is the insult?

This is what you do every time without fail and anyone with eyes can see it. The problem is you're unable to think beyond your own post, so you're just not equipped to discuss anything. You either pretend to be outraged and slighted - see above, or you reply with a joker smiley.

Grown ass man, dude; it's time to grow up a little.

Not if she’s living the life of Riley as she’ll be in danger living on the normal cell block


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I agree with this, especially as to her case.

Meanwhile one of the victims statements

'We hope you live a very long life and spend every single day suffering for what you have done.'

There's zero evidence of any kind that the death sentence offered closure for grieving families and in fact most report that it simply doesn't.

What can it possibly offer?

Either you don't believe in the after llife in which case you have to understand that death means nothing to the dead... Or you do believe in an afterlife, in which case you surely believe they're going to the bad version of that, and for eternity, and will go there when they die regardless... In which case, sending them there a couple of decades early is again meaningless.

And this is in fact how most families of victims feel after a death sentence is carried out. Hollow, nothing. It changes nothing.

and zero the other way

buy why not ask them?

"would you rather the woman who killed your baby died or spent the next 40 years watching sky sports, playing wordle, reading books, wanking to porn and participating in forums"?

i am taking a guess rather than listening to milksop liberals

Killing murderers does not stop others from murdering and it can never bring the victim back

It’s easy to say kill them when you are not doing the killing
If you was offered the job to kill them I think most wouldn’t want to do it.

I will add, killing someone that is trying to kill you or your family is totally acceptable to me

One of the saddest things is this woman will have countless documentaries and murder porn programs made about her over the coming years, the victims and their families will be forgotten about, but their pain and grief will be exploited for profit for many years to come focusing on this evil scumbag.

I agree sheriff for me there's only one acceptable reason to kill another human, and that's to protect someone else from being harmed by them. Like if someone walked in on her trying to harm a baby and the only way to stop her was to shoot her, by all means, shoot her.

But to do it as punishment? I just don't understand, really. Like I said, a dead person isn't upset that they're dead... they're just dead. If anything the only people further punished by executing her would be her own parents... and despite LT's insistence otherwise, I just don't think it offers any real benefit to the families of the victims to make it worth it.


And again I would add the caveat that it should never be done on trials by evidence/jury because the verdict IS sometimes wrong. As before that's not me passing comment on this particular case, just pointing out that it does happen, and there are examples of people being executed and then further evidence casting doubt that they were guilty, and a few rare examples of it being outright proven that they were NOT guilty, both in the US and here in the UK when we still had capital punishment.

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cp...il-nc.png.webp

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cp...ro-nc.png.webp

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cp...ss-nc.png.webp

Chester Hospital:Healthcare worker arrested on suspicion of murdering 8 babies
 

This monster has cost £1.5 million in court costs and a further £2 million for her legal aid fees !!

Aghhhh !!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Looks like they have proper ****ed this up given all the recent news speculation.

She will be out before long most likely.

BBC News Text:
[The paper's main story is an exclusive about
a potential upcoming documentary on Lucy Letby,
the British nurse who was sentenced
to 15 whole life terms after being convicted
of killing seven babies and trying
to kill seven more.
Sources tell the Mirror that Netflix is
"working with production company ITN"
to deliver it.]


https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/l...5af8a0305a.png

Netflix going to expose our NHS and Judicial system. This is going to be juicy.
If it can happen to Lucy it’s can happen to us.
If it can happen to those poor babies it can happen to our babies.
Time to expose the true evil in this country!