They have had countless nannies and have one now.

Thank you, Meghan.

Exactly. It's fact

Wow I wasn't aware you were close friends with Meghan & Harry , how's baby Archie doing ?? he's soo cute :hee: .

You are welcome jan.

They want their privacy, so keep your nose out

On their 4th in 8 months, not to mention the other staff that have resigned.
More red flags...but it couldn't be anything to do with Meghan, could it? :think:

:laugh:

Oh the irony

You're missing the real irony here :hehe:

Course I am you keep telling yourself that :hee:

I’ve not been looking they their curtains.

Stop trying to be clever and I won’t have to make you look silly.

It's amazing how Piers Morgan has forgotten this , and he wants to say Meghan hasn't experienced any racism :facepalm: :bored: .

She doesn't have a duty of care to him, how can she 'neglect' him? What, do you think she has to be the dutiful daughter regardless of what **** he throws her way? Parents don't own their children, they aren't entitled to rule over their lives and make demands of them as adults when they have gone out of their way to attack and alienate their children for monetary gain. Actions have consequences, her father's cruelty and greed has ensured he will likely never meet his grandson or play a role in his daughter's life and he has no one to blame but himself.

I dislike narcissistic abuse and this man ****ing REEKS of it and it's making me despair that there are people out there defending this greedy twat just because he opposes someone they hate. Would you honestly be saying the same thing if it was anyone other than Meghan's dad? Be honest with yourself.

Also your last sentence is grim, 'if she doesn't want a relationship with him then it's fair game for him to trash his own daughter in the press for profit.' You're basically okaying his actions of trying to force his daughter to acknowledge him when she has made it clear she doesn't want to. What gives him the right to do that when all she's done is decide she doesn't want a relationship with him? You say it's a two way street but I reckon she'd gladly take him disowning her at this point but it's not a two way street because what he is doing is worse.

What he is doing is wrong and no amount of mental gymnastics will change that.

It's a bit of a reach to describe a man who has given over half a million dollars of his own money to further his daughter's career, as greedy

Live from Mexico
he is on GMBHD itv.




Richard told her Dad
she moves on.
Even her Dad.

I feel for anyone not permitted to see their Grandchildren.
However him turning up on TV putting her down again, isn't the right way to do things and rightly isn't going to persuade her to let him see them.

It's for the Parents to decide who sees their children and if he was to even attempt to talk to his grandchildren about their Mother, the way he does on TV.

Then no wonder he's excluded, in my view.

He claims
it is the only way he can speak to her?

a man with serious mental issues clearly. You can't force someone to meet/talk to you

Appalling man

That's the truth.

In fact it's more likely to push her further away.

He doesn't know when to quit, he's a pitiful worm .

If he would just leave her alone she might eventually have decided to make contact with him, if and when she wanted to make contact with him. I think he's pretty much blown any chance of that now. He doesn't have a "right" to see or speak to her or communicate with her in any way... sheer entitlement.

Does it drive you nuts?

It's none of my business nor anyone elses who isn't a member of their family so ... no I couldn't really give a ****.

He has a right to see his grandkids.

He doesn’t.

Ok...

She doesnt have the right to stop them seeing him then...


Only a total bitch would do that to her kids and parents.

Legally, yes she does, until they're old enough to make that decision for themselves.


You have no idea what her reasons are so you can't confidently make that statement. For example, if someone was raised in an abusive household, I'd find it very understandable (even expected) if that person then wanted their kids to have nothing to do with the grandparents, or at least very limited contact. I personally would extend that to any massive differences in personal philosophies (e.g. racism, homophobia) IF they can't keep that to themselves when they're around the kids. Being around an angry/abusive/disrespectful grandparent is far worse for a kid than not seeing them at all.

I feel sorry for him. Imagine backing your daughter until she makes it, so she can turn her back on you very publicly. I'm not sure how a father who was obviously very close to his daughter at one time, would cope with that. See the big Karma bus trundling up behind Meghan........

Why are we imagining Meghan grew up in an abusive household?

No one knows fully whats gone on or what had led to their fall out ,no good blaming one because you like the other, truth is none of us KNOW what sort of people they are or what has happened , I never got on with my father but I would never have stopped him seeing his grandchildren, that seems rather cold to me ,and I would have been there for him had he been ill or needed me.

Theres a lot of imagination running rife in this thread Livia.:wavey:

Like the ones calling him names are the ones in the know...

:hehe::laugh::wavey:

We're not - we're pointing out that no one knows the specifics of anyone's family situation if they're not a part of that family, and therefore we shouldn't judge other parents for their choices when it comes to who is and isn't regularly around their children.

Like I said it's not even just about abuse. There are plenty of parents who, for example, don't speak to their (adult) children respectfully or treat them as equals. If someone is raising their child to be respectful and treat people as equals, then it's perfectly legitimate to not want them to be in regular contact with someone who doesn't hold those values. And frankly, to not want to be around those people yourself.

If that person is desperate to keep in contact with their family then they'll moderate their behaviour and how they speak to people when they're around them. If they can't (i.e. won't) do that then tough **** ... and it's also legitimate to say "too little too late".

If she wasnt abused, then she is acting like a bitch.

We have had no reason to believe she was abused, but have plenty reason to know she was loved and adored by her dad, seeing that she has said so in many occasion.

So she is acting like a bitch, and I said that with confidence

But "no reason to believe" means nothing - you have no idea about her personal family history, it's none of your business, and not your place to judge. It's really that simple. Maybe there was abuse, maybe there wasn't, maybe she has no reason, maybe she has plenty of reasons ... the point is, it's a parent's job to decide what's best for their children while they are children, so again, it's just no one else's business ... you don't know why she's made the choice, and you have no good reason to need to know why she's made that choice, or to really think anything of it at all.

I can judge her actions...which I have done.