Easy mistake. Can happen to anyone.

[QUOTE=The Slim Reaper;11322547]My globalist elites? You realise that the politics I support is pretty much banned from even being spoken about in the US? Corporations run the world, and you think after reading everything I've written on here about the destruction waged on people by capital, that I'm the one supporting the globalist elites, whilst you will make any old nonsense up to protect a billionaire rapist, property developer, elite?

Nah blud, that ain't it.[/QUOT E]Trump is the only Politician taking on the elites (I mean actually taking them on with actions, not words) and he's your number 1 enemy. What else am I suppose to think

He's not taking them on at all. He gave them all tax breaks.

He spoke about a new healthcare plan when he was running as a candidate - still waiting.

He loves to say what he's doing, without ever actually doing it.

What elites is he fighting, exactly? Not with trumpy words, but what did he actually do when he had the chance.

He did what all other republicans would do - the bare minimum, crack down on voting, and then tax breaks. The only difference is that he tried to do a coup and failed.

Yes, I agree. We all look the same.

Gives everyone tax breaks. That's a good thing. Much better than giving more to the elites to waste. More money their own money in the people's pockets.

Paris agreement. The globalists goldmine. He scrapped that straight away.

Except no, because those tax breaks make him responsible for more debt than any other president. He gave the bare minimum to folks that needed, and generously to elites with yachts.

He's a capitalist first and foremost. When rich folks get money, they hide it, when poor folks get money, they spend it in the local economy, which helps to build.

So the Paris agreement is all you've got? Again, he did it for elitist reasons, and whether anyone believes in the climate science or not, having a healthier environment with cleaner air isn't really the oppression the elites have propagandised it to be.

To be fair, he realised he'd made a mistake so wanted to nip it in the bud :smug:

Bud um tish...with a bored monkey giff.

The most likely rigged Elections in any country would be Elections where the votes were already genuinely close to begin with.

That's my belief anyway.

That's not really a secret is it?:laugh:

the flaw in that argument is that Trump was the government in power at the time. He was the person in a position to steal the election. Biden was on the outside :laugh:

Fair :laugh:

Like I said I think Trump genuinely did lose, but I am open to convincing arguments, because nothing would surprise me :laugh:

"The hood for Trump" movement is growing.

Trump campaign raises $7.1m following
historic Georgia mugshot

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-66632882

yes but he has spent 59 million so far on lawyers to fight his court cases

fox news analysis .... nothing more needs to be said

this song as Trumpie's campaign song pls



suits him well

Over a year ago I made this prediction. I still think I'm gonna be right. I usually am.

Roger Stone comes out with this tweet today.

This is the man folks say is more "with it" than Biden.

Meanwhile

Pffft..anyone can do that after drinking the blood of a child for breakfast.

both candidates are blinking awful, i don't know how anyone can say any different. However only Trump wants to be a dictator

This.

Plus their Maths makes no sense.

If there's two candidates, Biden's on 61% with black voters, shouldn't that leave Trump with 39% of the vote instead of 20%?

Angelina Jolie has changed a lot.

Dont mention that beating heart eating bitch to me.

:laugh:

But Bono sung about her giving people elevation?

Elevation was about Beatrice potter.

I'm joking about the Music Video having the Tomb Raider Film featured.:laugh:

NO worries.. I made that up cause he sings about a mole in a hole.

Oh.:joker:

This conspiracy theorist called it in August last year.

Let's see if he gets the second part of his prediction right?

Trump is definitely winning this. He's still extremely popular.

not sure about that now


Kamala Harris could stand a good chance, if she is indeed running, and if she also chooses a good young running mate




extremely popular? umm maybe in Trump's own little world he is, but only reason he was a favourite before in these elections was because his opposition was demented Biden whom he easily demolished in that one debate, now against a stronger and younger opposition not so sure how he'll do when his opponent can fight back in debates

It's all about popularity. Is she well known enough to win? I doubt it.
The only one who could realistically beat Trump is Obama himself.

Trump will be slaughtered in any debate against a half-reasonable opponent, he only knows how to be wuippy and sarcastic but of course his loyalists will lap that up and hoot their little MAGA socks off (which doesn't matter - they're voting for him regardless). Anyone else will admit if he's losing every debate "by the scorecards".

The issue is, it seems to matter less and less these days... Trump voters simply don't care about old-style politics. They're more interested in his "preach to the choir" rallies and social media jabs.

Obama would undoubtedly wipe the floor with Trump but, alas, he has had his two terms as POTUS.

Maybe Michelle Obama could be a good candidate? Not sure she would win, bur still