ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB16 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=663)
-   -   *** The Big Brother 16 ratings thread*** (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=274578)

Beetlejuice 11-06-2015 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willbrick1999 (Post 7869105)
You really don't understand do you you idiot!

If it was getting 1.8 million viewers you would focus on that regardless of the share, as everyone else would. You are just grasping at straws to defend how badly this show is doing this year. A situation that will be repeated again next year the more people on here defend this mess.

Will. 11-06-2015 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beetlejuice (Post 7869158)
If it was getting 1.8 million viewers you would focus on that regardless of the share, as everyone else would. You are just grasping at straws to defend how badly this show is doing this year. A situation that will be repeated again next year the more people on here defend this mess.

No I wouldn't because 1.8 M with a 5% share is crap!

RichardG 11-06-2015 04:01 PM

Doesn't a low figure with a high share just mean that people aren't turning their TVs on to watch Big Brother, which isn't really very good?? Like I don't know the first thing about viewing figues so I might be wrong but I would've thought that 1.8m would look more attractive to the channel and advertisers than 1.1m regardless of what the share is.

Beetlejuice 11-06-2015 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willbrick1999 (Post 7869163)
No I wouldn't because 1.8 M with a 5% share is crap!

It's worth more to them than 900k with a 6.8% share.

Jason. 11-06-2015 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardG (Post 7869169)
Doesn't a low figure with a high share just mean that people aren't turning their TVs on to watch Big Brother, which isn't really very good?? Like I don't know the first thing about viewing figues so I might be wrong but I would've thought that 1.8m would look more attractive to the channel and advertisers than 1.1m regardless of what the share is.

That's what I thought too.

The %age share doesn't define the series average. It may be getting a 8% share or whatever. But that still makes it the lowest ever rated series of BBUK, not only on Channel 5, but in the history of Big Brother. In other words least watched series ever.

Those shares just show that TV viewership is down, not that Big Brother is doing well. If Big Brother was doing well, it would still have the loyal 1.6m viewers that it had during 2011-2014. They've lost about half a million of that.

daniel-lewis-1985 11-06-2015 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob! (Post 7869110)
Don't rise to it - just put him on ignore like I have. Hopefully he'll be banned before very much longer, seeing as he's been asked by a mod to just make a thread for his negative bollocks instead of cluttering up this thread with it and he's ignored it.

If you had put him on ignore how did you know who he was talking to? lol

Someones telling porkies.

Anyway another crap rating.

Nikki doesn't belong in a show getting a tiny viewerwship she is way to big of a character she belongs on IACGMOOH she was th made for that show.

mrmattybeck1 11-06-2015 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BB6 (Post 7868669)
I just think they should kill Civvy BB, TBH.
It's never going to be good again.

They had a good run during 2012 and 2013. But ever since the rise of CBB, the quality of the Civilian series has dropped. Anyone else notice this?

It needs resting not killing that would be fair on the 1m loyal fans who still watch it myself included

MB. 11-06-2015 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985 (Post 7869557)
If you had put him on ignore how did you know who he was talking to? lol

Someones telling porkies.

a) You can still see people you have on ignore if they're quoted.
b) You can choose to view a post if you want.

And trust me, I'd know. :thumbs:

Jamesy 11-06-2015 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BB6 (Post 7868669)
I just think they should kill Civvy BB, TBH.
It's never going to be good again.

They had a good run during 2012 and 2013. But ever since the rise of CBB, the quality of the Civilian series has dropped. Anyone else notice this?

I agree tbh. Civilian BB has had its day. They should just scrap it for a while.

I think the general public generally cannot be bothered with 'real people' shows created in this 24 hour daily show format. It was a nice novelty 10 or so years ago although viewers just aren't dedicated enough these days.

'Celebrity' shows seem to still have a wide appeal so CBB certainly still has a place on Channel 5. Probably time to see the back of civilian BB though.

Jason. 11-06-2015 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmattybeck1 (Post 7870007)
It needs resting not killing that would be fair on the 1m loyal fans who still watch it myself included

It needs to follow Love Island and take a break for ten years.
Love Island is how real TV show take breaks.

Maybe 10 years is too long. I'd say about 5 is enough.

Jason. 11-06-2015 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamesy (Post 7870066)
I agree tbh. Civilian BB has had its day. They should just scrap it for a while.

I think the general public generally cannot be bothered with 'real people' shows created in this 24 hour daily show format. It was a nice novelty 10 or so years ago although viewers just aren't dedicated enough these days.

'Celebrity' shows seem to still have a wide appeal so CBB certainly still has a place on Channel 5. Probably time to see the back of civilian BB though.

Yes.

Rob! 11-06-2015 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985 (Post 7869557)
If you had put him on ignore how did you know who he was talking to? lol

Someones telling porkies.

Anyway another crap rating.

Nikki doesn't belong in a show getting a tiny viewerwship she is way to big of a character she belongs on IACGMOOH she was th made for that show.

Erm, cause will had quoted him?

crazycolaist 11-06-2015 10:13 PM

Wow everybody is saying what i said last week now


let me tell you this
Netlifx,Amazon prime on demand thing, Online downloading are all up compared to 5 years ago hence why the shares combined with ratings are similar to compare 5 years.

Lets take a week for you guys to make sense of how TV habits are changing cause I said this a week ago in the same post I said big brother needs few years break. agh.

Jamesy 11-06-2015 10:15 PM

To be fair multiple people have been saying on here Big Brother needs a break for years

Beetlejuice 12-06-2015 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmattybeck1 (Post 7870007)
It needs resting not killing that would be fair on the 1m loyal fans who still watch it myself included

What it needs is to be brought back to life. Half of the people watching can't really be considered "fans"

Beetlejuice 12-06-2015 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamesy (Post 7870235)
To be fair multiple people have been saying on here Big Brother needs a break for years

It's been on a break for 5 years. Again.

Beetlejuice 12-06-2015 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamesy (Post 7870066)
I agree tbh. Civilian BB has had its day. They should just scrap it for a while.

Alternatively they can recognise that it doesn't work without the live coverage and develop a good website to host it.

Quote:

I think the general public generally cannot be bothered with 'real people' shows created in this 24 hour daily show format. It was a nice novelty 10 or so years ago although viewers just aren't dedicated enough these days.
How can you be dedicated to it when it is impossible to keep up with? How can you be dedicated when you the viewers are as confused as to what is actually going on as the HMs.

People really should stop pretending that the BB format is tired when the BB format was turned on by Channel 5 from the start.

Jamesy 12-06-2015 08:28 AM

If you're quoting me Beetlejuice I can't see your posts, you're on ignore babes xo

Beetlejuice 12-06-2015 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamesy (Post 7870855)
If you're quoting me Beetlejuice I can't see your posts, you're on ignore babes xo

That's okay. But for people reading this forum, you must be corrected.

RichardG 12-06-2015 09:26 AM

do we really have to repeat the same conversations in this thread every single day?? D:

Rob! 12-06-2015 09:58 AM

1.1m including +1 for last night. Nothing really changing. Tonight will be the decider!

Beetlejuice 12-06-2015 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob! (Post 7870978)
1.1m including +1 for last night. Nothing really changing. Tonight will be the decider!

It won't. Even if the figures go up, they're only there for a week. And it's not like they can go on repeating such stunts.

Jason. 12-06-2015 10:33 AM

I doubt this week will bring in much viewers.

4in4out didn't bring much viewers. I think this week will get around 1.5m, and then it will go back to 1.1m again, next week.

Rob! 12-06-2015 10:34 AM

The +1 figure was pretty substantial last night, it was at 957k without it - people clearly not aware it started at 9 and then it was probably ever so slightly dented by Love Island too - mind you, that only got 357k :hehe:

Jason. 12-06-2015 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob! (Post 7871010)
The +1 figure was pretty substantial last night, it was at 957k without it - people clearly not aware it started at 9 and then it was probably ever so slightly dented by Love Island too - mind you, that only got 357k :hehe:

I'm enjoying LI more than BB, TBH.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.