![]() |
Quote:
and you see this forum as a place for apologetics? |
Quote:
http://www.christiancourier.com/arti...-and-the-bible http://www.carm.org/questions/other-...entioned-bible Personally I would say this: does the Bible and specifically Genesis record a true account of the origin of the material universe? I would say yes. On the other hand does the Bible and specifically Genesis provide information in a way that corresponds to the purposes of modern science? I would say no. |
Right.
I take it you believe the adam and eve story too...in that case, can you explain how we have scientific proof of evolution. Plus I only looked on the first of those two sites, and that doesnt answer anything. If dinosaurs were created around the same time as everything else, and the bible states that everything was 'made' in 7 days...then humans must have been around for millions of years, not thousands. Edit. Plus, you giving me two sites to read is you doing exactly what you were criticising ProbeEight for doing earlier on. No answers of your own? |
Quote:
I gave you two sites that are sourced and established and I gave you my opinion. ? As I stated you have to read the Bible for what it was written for - it is not a scientific document written last week. |
Quote:
|
Christianity is a fact. Unless the people who go to my church are figments of my imagination?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:devil: |
This thread just keeps on getting better.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
But even as believers should learn to look for reasons behind
their faith, skeptics must learn to look for a type of faith hidden within their reasoning. All doubts, however skeptical and cynical they may seem, are really a set of alternate beliefs. You cannot doubt Belief A except from a position of faith in Belief B. For example, if you doubt Christianity because “There can’t be just one true religion,” you must recognize that this statement is itself an act of faith. No one can prove it empirically, and it is not a universal truth that everyone accepts. If you went to the Middle East and said, “There can’t be just one true religion,” nearly everyone would say, “Why not?” The reason you doubt Christianity’s Belief A is because you hold unprovable Belief B. Every doubt, therefore, is based on a leap of faith. Some people say, “I don’t believe in Christianity because I can’t accept the existence of moral absolutes. Everyone should determine moral truth for him- or herself.” Is that a statement they can prove to someone who doesn’t share it? No, it is a leap of faith, a deep belief that individual rights operate not only in the po liti cal sphere but also in the moral. There is no empirical proof for such a position. So the doubt (of moral absolutes) is a leap. Some will respond to all this, “My doubts are not based on a leap of faith. I have no beliefs about God one way or another. I simply feel no need for God and I am not interested in thinking about it.” But hidden beneath this feeling is the very modern American belief that the existence of God is a matter of indifference unless it intersects with my emotional needs. The speaker is betting his or her life that no God exists who would hold you accountable for your beliefs and behaviour if you didn’t feel the need for him. That may be true or it may not be true, but, again, it is quite a leap of faith. The only way to doubt Christianity rightly and fairly is to discern the alternate belief under each of your doubts and then to ask yourself what reasons you have for believing it. How do you know your belief is true? It would be inconsistent to require more justifi cation for Christian belief than you do for your own, but that is frequently what happens. In fairness you must doubt your doubts. My thesis is that if you come to recognize the beliefs on which your doubts about Christianity are based, and if you seek as much proof for those beliefs as you seek from Christians for theirs—you will discover that your doubts are not as solid as they first appeared. I commend two processes to my readers. I urge skeptics to wrestle with the unexamined “blind faith” on which skepticism is based, and to see how hard it is to justify those beliefs to those who do not share them. I also urge believers to wrestle with their personal and culture’s objections to the faith. At the end of each process, even if you remain the skeptic or believer you have been, you will hold your own position with both greater clarity and greater humility. Then there will be an understanding, sympathy, and respect for the other side that did not exist before. Believers and nonbelievers will rise to the level of disagreement rather than simply denouncing one another. This happens when each side has learned to represent the other’s argument in its strongest and most positive form. Only then is it safe and fair to disagree with it. That achieves civility in a pluralistic society, which is no small thing. (Tim Kellor, The reason for God) |
What a load of ****.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
There's two things you can't get from a Christian. A good blowjob and a straight answer.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.