I wasn't aware that that was a particularly large phenomena that bothered anyone. I can think of three maybe four pot smokers on here and it doesn't really alter your conscious to the point where you feel compelled to post nonsense shit.

Being an spacker is a far bigger impetus for that. No drugs necessary.

It bothers me not a jot either. It was in reply to Josy being able to determine when a poster is tipsy and causing arguments and it was merely a point I was making.

Half the forum is made up with people posting nonsense shit (to quote you directly).

As I said - it's no coincidence that you've been at the centre of most of the arguments on here recently. And as I also said, I'm not having a personal dig I'm just making an observation, for it to be personal would imply that I have something against you as a person which I dont, I just think you've been a bit argumentative recently.

I really don't see how this thread is constructive, it's not even like it was posted in the suggestion forum, I think you've just made it to have a moan and be a bit controversial by saying members should be banned if they're drunk, even if they're being harmless enough. And although you dont name names you suceed in making it clear who you're criticising with your moans and then whenever anyone objects to something you say you just act completely bewildered and feign offence.

Anyway yes, nothing personal, just my opinion etc. etc.

Rather than continuing down the matter of discussing me personally - which you are doing - perhpas you'd like to have the decency to either take it off the board - or at least get back to the topic of the thread

And no, that's not me being argumentative: that's me trying to stick to the rules of the forum.

To be quite honest I am sick of you always moaning about something or someone and playing the victim card. People get drunk and come one here, so bloody what? What harm does it do you?

I don't get you sometimes and to be honest I don't want to. Now see that as an attack if you want, I couldn't care, but that is my opinion of you on here.

I don't see the harm in members coming on here and talking complete gibberish, if they are have a laugh or a friendly drunken chat then that's fine, it would just be unfair to ban someone for that, you wouldn't be allowed to have a bit of fun and entertainment on here any more.

Actions should only be taken if the drunken member is posting in an aggressive, argumentative manner and is needlessly trying to cause fights with other members for no reason.

And what point is that?

You can't determine when someone is stoned and posting stupid stuff and it doesn't matter anyway because it bothers nobody so why even go to the effort of mentioning it?

You can determine if someone is tipsy and argumentative sometimes if they have said they are drinking and are clearly a bit louder than usual and are pissing people off.

That's clearly what Josy was reffering to, right? Those obvious cases? Not that I want to speak for her.

'Well you can't determine if someone is sitting on a red chair when their typing loooooooool'.

What harm does it do me? clearly none. However your own post is incredibly aggressive and hostile. I raised a thread on a subject some do not care for or agree with.

I'm not entirely clear why I am being attacked by mods and members alike for a discussing a subject which others don't agree with. Where exactly is the rule break on that? :conf:

which filthy bastard has done this :bored:

should be permabanned imo

this forum has 13 year olds on it some people make me sick

And maybe if you have a problem with the members who come on here drunk or talk about sex - you've made it pretty clear who you were referring to - you could have the decency to mention it in private or at least make a constructive post in the appropiate area? Come on, dont try now to make a point of trying to strongly uphold forum rules

I hear it was ElProximo.

Why not just report posts if you don't think they are appropriate?

Oh get a grip woman. Yet again another case of you starting a thread knowing full well what the response would be and digging at members, then turning it to the 'pity me' phase.

Why jump to the conclusion that I was referring to anyone in particular with my post? You asked a question in your op and I posted my reply just like everyone else did, I am aware when members are tipsy because they post on the forum telling people that, I have also never known anyone thats stoned to be argumentative on here.

As for the members jumping on the bandwagon etc comment, I have no idea what that has got to do with my post or the original op.

I have.

I am not jumping to any conclusion, that's why I asked the question.

I don't believe I said that anyone who was stoned on the forum was argumentative: I was making the point that being tipsy is not any worse than being stoned.

The whole thread - to make it completely clear and transparent (once again) is not about people being drunk: it's about those who have not a clue what they are doing: not a few typos, not a bit of daftness or sillyness: but those who are so out of it that they can't put two word together just about.

Then they may have been infracted I'd imagine

I was referring to on this thread. I wouldn't (and haven't) reported anyone for the drunken stuff... it was merely a thread for general debate with a hint of seriousness to it.

The mods must have an absoloute ball of a time going through those reports.

somebody deleted my posts :nono:

people need to know these things

somebody deleted my posts :nono:

people need to know these things