![]() |
Quote:
*Prize* money is for the *winner*. If Jay wasn't the slime-cheat-lowlife-pig I know he is, he would have *NOT* spent £500 with money that is technically *NOT* his. And he would give the remaining £14,500 *BACK* to it's *RIGHTFUL* owner. |
Quote:
:D 850 if he went to Vietnam. |
Quote:
|
Can't help but feel that people are deciding to insult Jay's Mum as a way of directing the attention away from the point of the thread - that Aaron has allegedly gone back his agreement to split the money
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Just pointing the facts out Sobig, just pointing out the facts. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't think Aaron should, or will, split the money though. I hope he doesn't! He won it fair and square! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Jay still having his £15000...shows that he also has so far gone back on his deal. Aaron should split nothing until the first deal is done anyway, as if he splits and the others dont, Jay ends up better off than the winner. Put simply...I'm sure Jay and Aaron(and the others) are more than capable of sorting this out between themselves. Without Mrs Mutton flapping her gums about something thats nowt to do with her :bored: |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
We were shown a clip of them talking about splitting it. Whos to say that later in the day they didnt have a change of heart and decide that whoever wins..wins? Again, relying only on what BB show us, which lets be honest...throughout the show, hasnt really tallied up. |
Quote:
I agree. If there is any real debate over sharing:then the first promise has to be enacted upon, before Aaron should be expected to fulfill the 2nd promise. |
Can someone back up and explain this... I'm fairly sure I watched every single episode of the series, and I never saw Aaron claim he would share any of the final-winner's prize money with Jay. How do people know this even happened? YouTube clip please?
THe only sharing I saw mentioned was in the 50% twist in the final week, where everyone promised to share that equally. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
and what about the mother's comment about Jay's £15,000 as per the newpaper article. Or aren't you including that, because that's something else we have to 'go on' atm. Doing one but not the other shows a degree of unreasonability about it. |
Quote:
Some people, like me, are annoyed at Jay's mum for coming out with all this so soon... it is unreasonable to expect Jay to have the money now, even if Aaron does plan on sharing it. Have Jay and Alex shared their money? |
Quote:
|
I haven't read anything about this..what is Jay 28? ish.......how humiliating that his mum feels the need to talk for him....If Jay has something to say, he'll say it..otherwise she needs to pipe down and do some knitting
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ah right. so let's go back to the beginning here then. The article is ambigious. Okay, I'll go with that - so because it is ambigous, you are ignoring what it says about Jay and his £15,000. But when the same ambigious assumptions are made abour Aaron and his winnings.... you don't ignore that - yet you did when it is related to Jay - or indeed, his mother - who is the one the newspaper quotes: which is why she is being discussed and given flack. We don't know what she says is true either way: about Jay OR about Aaron. I think that's highly hypocritical. In fact, it IS highly hypocritical. and to that end, there is absolutely no point in debating further with you - as you very much are on a one course direction - and showing complete inability to apply the same rules to one person, as you do another. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.