That was a shocker!!!

If she wants any kind of career in the public eye, which I can only presume she does by appearing on BB, then she is doing herself no favours by not splitting the money. Not good pr!

I don't care whether she does or not but it is a valid topic of discussion.

Respect is earned by being a respectful person.

If I'd been in the house I'd never have let Alex get the 30k

Actually you'll find the rules of the forum state respect is to be given. ;)

I'm not talking about the forum.

How would you have done that exactly?

It seems that your thought processes take you all around the houses, just trying to 'simplify' things for you.

none of your business.

So let me get this right. You come into a thread, select one part of a comment, make a reply on that single part, which you know are admitting that it had nothing to do with the forum (which encompassess threads, comments, posts, etc) - for what purpose exactly Fruitcake?

If you have nothing to add to the thread and it's subject matter - why have you posted?

pmsl!

Kind offer but no need. Certainly no need when the housemates didn't keep to their word.

You are doing the same thing. Why won't you comment on what Tom said? because it shoots your theory down. They don't have to show how the whole deal on the HL. It was spelled out. Tom made it perfectly clear when he made his statement and they all agreed and then he made the statement again.

I could go through the whole gambit of who said what, when, where, at what time: but it's ALL pointless seeing as they didn't all keep to their word or keep to their agreement with each other.

I'm certainly not going to agree with you simply because you want to force me into it - especially when I don't agree.

Who is to say that further discussions didn't take place off camera (as you have almost alluded to yourself) - thus invalidating the original agreement as shown on the HLs show? We don't know - neither of us - so we're debating over ifs, buts, maybes on that matter.

That comment you quoted was specifically to Fruitcake btw: given that she has entered a thread with absolutely no desire to discuss the sujbect matter. You will find I have been discussing the topic.

No one is forcing you to do anything. I provided facts to back up my comments.

You have been debating over ifs and buts the whole season. We were only given a 45 min edited HL show to watch. so a lot of discussions took place off camera.

None of which negates my own right to offer my own view on the easiest way for the money to have been split - which is what you are disputing.

As I said, not that matters because Alex very much appears to have renaiged on her deal with the others.

Take the 's' from housemates and you are nearly there.

Alex has the £30k which needs spitting, Jay has already split his money with Louise!!

I will see it as I chose to, not how you decide I should.

Fact is only Alex and Jay had to share, Jay has done so with Louise so it is up to Alex to do the rest. All this talk about having to pool the money is nonsensical!!

OMG well done!! WE have arrived!!

Thank you yes, Alex went back on the deal!!

Choose to, not chose to!!

I've quoted my post above - rather than the 'amended' / 'altered' version you put up.

Look, you can argue till the cows come home. I have my view on it. You have yours - and we disagree. That's it in a nutshell.

forgive me here, but isn't the thread about ALEX ..... ;)

Good god.

Can't argue with FACTS.

Yes it is, on how Alex has gone back on the deal, no one else ;)

You're boring me to death now.