Anyway, I'm sure all four of them are happy again seeing the journey of horror is now over. Learn by your mistakes and don't ever agree to do a pa with someone who robs from the blind, that's what I say ;)

.... or those who sh*t in freezers, pee on others - and then bemoan that someone else being not showing 'respect' ;)

Yeah not great is it...but I regard robbing from the blind ultimately a no no! ;)

Whitawyetaetalktaemalumber, by the great Dorothy Paul.....had me in stitches.
:laugh:
I'd never seen this before, thanks for putting it on.

the pa appearane was a paying job,so if a job is worth doing you do it!,
this post is in context with this thread! if it get removed you are violateing my rights to post on this forum!

That began as quite an interesting thread, shame it disintegrated, it was obvious Alex was fake, from the tan to her little girl act.

You already know why your other one was removed so dont try to play innocent :)

I don't think anyone disputed the PA job not being a paying job.? :conf:

The thread arose from the tweets Jay raised on his way to it - not whether he (or any of them) should do PA work or not.

Well I thought seeing as I'm one of the ones who take great pleasure in ripping the arse out of Jay all too often - in the way he types in his 'spoken accent' - that it was only fair that I could show the same self depreciating humour that the Scots are famed for. :)

And in between, give us all a wee giggle at the same time.

:joker:

I don't believe she repeated such a thing ....has she? If not, I think she learned her lesson.

Jay however, seems not to have, given that he is repugnant, and repeatedly. ;)

Deleted some posts in here 'because I can'

But seriously, keep on topic...and I swear if you dont drop this ridiculous thing you have against me since I removed your insult to me thesheriff443...then you WILL be on a ban.

Take this as an official warning.

i have nothing agaist you! but i should be able to deffend my posts, its not what i write its what you read!,if you whant to ban me you can but its just another example of not being allowed to have an opinion if you dont agree with it!.

No, I asked you to keep on topic and you took a huff and started insulting me. Incase you didnt know, its one of the rules of the forum. Perhaps you should go and read them before posting again, as you clearly have not read them before.

im well aware of the rules thankyou.

Sure it was - several of the housemates said the same thing - that she was far from as daft as she made out - Aaron, Harry and even Tom IIRC - and probably more than we didn't hear mentioning it in the HLs.

Many on here said the same thing but ultimately: she won in her own way: she left the house wearing a £500 pair of shoes and with £30k coming her way - far from daft !! ;)

Well she can hardly be given credit for ending up with £30k, that was sheer luck

I didn't say it was to her credit .... didn't change the end result thought did it. She still walked out of there with more than Jay and Louise put together....regardless.

;)

I didn't say it did change the end result, just pointed out that her walking away with £30k hardly proves that she's "far from daft" to quote yourself

Who were the ones who bought 2 people £500 birthday presents each.......and ended up with those same 2 people disliking them anyway. I'd hardly call that a smart move - (especially then being caught on camera bitching about doing it) !! :joker:

I thought we were talking about Alex, not Jay and Louise :conf:

Last time I checked the thread subject, it said
We were talking about Alex - I then brought Jay and Louise into the conversation because I chose to.

You yourself earlier on in this very same thread, strong condoned being allowed to bring into discussion others as a point of comparison - my point of comparison being that Jay and Louise were the daft ones buying anyone they didn't really know, £500 worth of gifts, totally £1,000.

But it seems you tried to shift the focus back to Jay and Louise because you realised you'd credited Alex for being "far from daft" when she'd just randomly pulled 30K out a hat ;)

So..... pull me up when I've broken a rule MTVN.

I didn't say Alex received her £30k because she wasn't daft - I pointed out that she still WON - regardless, because (by random act or not), she still came out with her £500 shoes and £30k.

Show me where I said it was to her credit that she won the £30k, the post is below.

She got £30k, duped the others into thinking she would share it - and didn't.... I'd say that was far from being daft, wouldn't you. ;)

Pull me up where I said that you had!! I'm not going to repeat myself, and getting into an unnecessarily long argument, I've already my point in my above posts