ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB13 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=593)
-   -   Just to remind people of Conor's charm. (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=206729)

Ultra Violet 15-07-2012 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 5304740)
You well know that if i put anyones name forward, you and others will feed off it. So i wont give you that pleasure. you might find it hard to defend conor, i dont. I guess my forgiving nature sets me aside of others. My old mum used to tell me that people that forgive and forget have been blessed, people that harbour a grudge are yet to find peace. These young kids have been thrown in there and been chosen because of their volotile nature or placid demeanor. Conor got the job as did Deana for 2 oposite and unequal reasons. They are there to provide entertainment and be gawked at by us the great British public who love to tear lumps out of eachother if our views differ.

In the past even the most hated HM,s have been accepted and revered by the general public once they come out so are they bad, rotten and psycotic, answer is no, they just find it hard to not fight or cry in the house.Once Conor is out he will revert back to being an uncouth youth and once Deana is out she will revert back to being a spoilt brat. Their lives will never be the same but I wish them all the best.

If you really want to know why I like conor, I will tell you. He is willing to roll his sleeves up and get mad, get funny, get dirty and get even. All these emotions provide entertainment. Why dont I like Deana, well I do but like a whinging child that needs to be chastised, she just whinges non stop. She never lets up with this endless need to be loved and forgiven or revered by all those that think she must be regarded as priveledged and beautiful. She is a contestant in a game show and needs to lighten up. SAhe feeds off sympathy and its pathetic. I want to see a good series with cotrovosy not a bunch of whingers crying and blubbering.

Do you see any irony in the bit in bold ... ?

I am afraid it now appears that we do have someone in the house who is genuinely psychotic (sic) and it looks as if he will get a massive shock when he comes out of the house and discovers that the vast majority of viewers have been left very cold by his antics ...

I note that your favourites are always men and reserve the right to draw my own conclusion

MrWong 15-07-2012 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 5304665)
Vortex, firstly I am not a troll and I reckon Vanesa is upset to but unlike some of the posters on here, I am a man of forgiving nature. I know he was wrong but he said what he did in an emotional filled rant and I for one cant and wont believe he either meant it or would do such things in real ife. His girlfriend and family friends say the same so in the absence of real life evidence I put it down to a huge brain fart to get noticed. End of in my book, time to move on. Others have said and done far worse but are being left alone.

What about when he threatened to get Benedict at the wrap party?

What Benedict did had **** all to do with Conor but he still dished out threats.

Face it, he's a thug.

MrWong 15-07-2012 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 5304734)
I have come round to Deana as a housemate and quite like her as a housemate, she does nothing, she hates washing up, she doesn't cook, she won't iron or anything, that still likely annoys them.Although I now like her as a housemate, she is not a person I would like at all or trust.

Conor, knows full well,from his own observations and from others, that she with Lydia was plotting and scheming behind his back along with their plotting aginst Arron too. For no reason at that time whatsoever.
He is also still likely against her because she chose him as the only male housemate to put up for eviction after they had been in the house for around 1 hour only.

Had I been him,in the house, I would not have an ounce of trust to put in Deana, she still couldn't resist going to Luke A and starting on about him staying,another attempt to run him down, even when he was totally ignoring her.
Last week she was relieved the way the great British public saved her as she said, well they did the same to Conor this week, sadly Deana cannot find any graciousness at all as to his victory on friday so tries to begin the plotting again right away,it must be really frustrating for her not to be able to talk directly about nominations.
She is also concealing tha fact she also actually nominated Shievonne, the person she now claims she wanted to stay.Amazing double standards.

Deana is far from perfect, she is a backstabber and a liar much the same as most of them can be in there, she doesn't shout and swear that much, although that is creeping in a bit more now, but she is what is seen as a silent menace,(we have people like her at Uni and I keep well clear of them, they cause big trouble because they are so plausible the way they do it), she cleverly gets said what she wants to, whether its truth or lies and is convincing because she does in a reigned in and controlled way.she is still never -the-less doing it though.

Conor is also far from perfect, which his outburst so long ago in the series proved, however clearly the public don't hold that against him to any degree like the forums do.
He is not controlled like Deana he fires off on all cylinders, he has told Deana loads of times, they will never get on, he doesn't like her because he doesn't trust her.

He avoids her like the plague,she should do the same with him too.He is always going to rant at her, (she knows that full well too), that's how he deals with people he cannot trust and doesn't like,likely with men too.
She plots and schemes and then wonders what has she done wrong because she claims never to have spoken to him.
That says a lot too, if she has never really spoken to him, what basis long before his offensive outburst, did she then have to plot and scheme his downfall and set out to ruin his chances on the show.

These are 2 housemates that should be kept as separate from each other as is possible, putting them together for that punishment thing was ridiculous, they should have made him wash the laundry and her do the cooking for 2 days,since they are clearly not going to put housemates up for eviction automatically for talking about nominations.

In their own ways,they are both good housemates with most or all of the others, together a disaster,sadly that is the case sometimes with people.

BiB - You are just parroting what Conor says.

There have been a number of clips where you see Deana in the background washing or drying dishes.

Are you saying the others didn't plot? That only Lydia and Deana plot?
I think you need to go back and re-watch the first 3 weeks.

sampvt 15-07-2012 09:45 AM

Mr Wong, change your name to Mr Cherry picker or insert an R between the w and the o. It is getting really tedious to constantly read your posts which for the most part concern one or two words or sentences written by people that you blow up out of all porportion. I for one dont have a professional proof reader for my posts so occassionaly I say stuff that can be taken both ways.

joeysteele 15-07-2012 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrWong (Post 5304773)
BiB - You are just parroting what Conor says.

There have been a number of clips where you see Deana in the background washing or drying dishes.

Are you saying the others didn't plot? That only Lydia and Deana plot?
I think you need to go back and re-watch the first 3 weeks.

I have indeed watched them many times,of course others did too 'but' Deana and Lydia were 2 of the most and regular plotters and schemers from the moment they knew they could talk about nominations.Lydia and Deana were plotting Arron's and Conors downfall fron day 5 in the house.

Of course Deana will have to at times do some chores in the house, but she herself says she doesn't do things like washing,ironing and cooking, also however,it is not me but in fact the other housemates who have nominated her in the past that say she does virtually nothing around the house.

Not saying that will go against her, for instance, Anthony who won BB6, did virtually nothing around the house either, he won though.


I have watched all the series highlights many times by the way.

MrWong 15-07-2012 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 5304777)
Mr Wong, change your name to Mr Cherry picker or insert an R between the w and the o. It is getting really tedious to constantly read your posts which for the most part concern one or two words or sentences written by people that you blow up out of all porportion. I for one dont have a professional proof reader for my posts so occassionaly I say stuff that can be taken both ways.

What's tedious is when someone puts points to you instead of answering the points you make the discussion about the poster. :sleep::sleep::sleep:

It's reminds me of high school debates.

MrWong 15-07-2012 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 5304796)
I have indeed watched them many times,of course others did too 'but' Deana and Lydia were 2 of the most and regular plotters and schemers from the moment they knew they could talk about nominations.Lydia and Deana were plotting Arron's and Conors downfall fron day 5 in the house.

Of course Deana will have to at times do some chores in the house, but she herself says she doesn't do things like washing,ironing and cooking, also however,it is not me but in fact the other housemates who have nominated her in the past that say she does virtually nothing around the house.

Not saying that will go against her, for instance, Anthony who won BB6, did virtually nothing around the house either, he won though.


I have watched all the series highlights many times.

I say i don't like washing, cooking and ironing, does that automatically mean i don't do any of those things?

Were these 'other hm's' Conor's mates? I only remember Arron using 'she does nothing' as a reason to nominate her. Who else did?

sampvt 15-07-2012 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrWong (Post 5304797)
What's tedious is when someone puts points to you instead of answering the points you make the discussion about the poster. :sleep::sleep::sleep:

It's reminds me of high school debates.

Sorry but high school wa a blurr to me BUT AT UNI, we all learned to ignore people that cherry picked others drafts becasue they generally couldnt come up with intelligent drafts of their own.

An argument is 2 peoples different points of views. A debate is intelligent and articulate conversation that breeds ideas. Cherry picking is a lazy way to wind up people. I prefer to argue or debate.

Gillian-73 15-07-2012 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soniamad (Post 5304521)
I'm a hetero guy so I never really understand women's taste in men. Thus, I have to ask the women on here - Is he actually good looking?

I mean maybe he is, but to me his arrogant sneer is immediately apparant. Surely he is one book that can absolutely, positively, be judged by his smug cover?

Good looking? Certainly not.
Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 5304665)
Vortex, firstly I am not a troll and I reckon Vanesa is upset to but unlike some of the posters on here, I am a man of forgiving nature. I know he was wrong but he said what he did in an emotional filled rant and I for one cant and wont believe he either meant it or would do such things in real ife. His girlfriend and family friends say the same so in the absence of real life evidence I put it down to a huge brain fart to get noticed. End of in my book, time to move on. Others have said and done far worse but are being left alone.

His girlfriend and his family would say that. What else could they say without getting him in deeper!

MrWong 15-07-2012 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 5304812)
Sorry but high school wa a blurr to me BUT AT UNI, we all learned to ignore people that cherry picked others drafts becasue they generally couldnt come up with intelligent drafts of their own.

An argument is 2 peoples different points of views. A debate is intelligent and articulate conversation that breeds ideas. Cherry picking is a lazy way to wind up people. I prefer to argue or debate.

So when will you start doing that?

All i've seen is you attacking the poster rather than the post.

A great example of that is when Jords put forward a post, with lots of points that could have been debated and you went on a totally irrelevant rant :joker:

Ultra Violet 15-07-2012 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 5304812)
Sorry but high school wa a blurr to me BUT AT UNI, we all learned to ignore people that cherry picked others drafts becasue they generally couldnt come up with intelligent drafts of their own.

An argument is 2 peoples different points of views. A debate is intelligent and articulate conversation that breeds ideas. Cherry picking is a lazy way to wind up people. I prefer to argue or debate.

I am looking forward to this ... when it starts ...

You seem to be proud of the fact that you don't proof your postings ... but if you did you would pick up on the obvious typos ... as a man who went to a UNI(versity) you would probably like to show the world that you came out as a literate person ... and it would be so much easier for us all to read ...

sampvt 15-07-2012 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Violet (Post 5304843)
I am looking forward to this ... when it starts ...

You seem to be proud of the fact that you don't proof your postings ... but if you did you would pick up on the obvious typos ... as a man who went to a UNI(versity) you would probably like to show the world that you came out as a literate person ... and it would be so much easier for us all to read ...



Its very difficult to debate anything with people that constantly cherry pick others posts, seems like its catching eh. If you feel the need to debate an issue, throw one out there and I will throw one back. Just to make it interesting, can we stick to something other than Conors ancient rant, it was so long ago my old grey cells cant remember it.

MrWong 15-07-2012 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 5304854)
Its very difficult to debate anything with people that constantly cherry pick others posts, seems like its catching eh. If you feel the need to debate an issue, throw one out there and I will throw one back. Just to make it interesting, can we stick to something other than Conors ancient rant, it was so long ago my old grey cells cant remember it.

It's the only significant thing the big bore's done all series.

Ultra Violet 15-07-2012 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 5304854)
Its very difficult to debate anything with people that constantly cherry pick others posts, seems like its catching eh. If you feel the need to debate an issue, throw one out there and I will throw one back. Just to make it interesting, can we stick to something other than Conors ancient rant, it was so long ago my old grey cells cant remember it.

Fraid not ... this thread is about Connor's charm ... and this is meant to be taken ironically ... I imagine ... (surely they cannot be serious ... ?)

So ... as most people have found his 'ancient rant' the most telling moment so far in terms of revealing his true self to the world it would be unfair to expect it to be excluded from the discussion ... (oh dear if you can't remember things from a few weeks ago maybe the Alzheimers really is setting in ... ?)

Not sure what you mean about this 'cherry picking' ... I am afraid that I simply follow my own path and argue my own ideas rather vigorously ... perhaps too vigorously for some ... ?

sampvt 15-07-2012 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Violet (Post 5304872)
Fraid not ... this thread is about Connor's charm ... and this is meant to be taken ironically ... I imagine ... (surely they cannot be serious ... ?)

So ... as most people have found his 'ancient rant' the most telling moment so far in terms of revealing his true self to the world it would be unfair to expect it to be excluded from the discussion ... (oh dear if you can't remember things from a few weeks ago maybe the Alzheimers really is setting in ... ?)

Not sure what you mean about this 'cherry picking' ... I am afraid that I simply follow my own path and argue my own ideas rather vigorously ... perhaps too vigorously for some ... ?


I am so surprised you cant find anything else to debate. Does this mean he is the perfect HM apart from his daft rant. I really was hoping you would come up with something new but it would appear that it is now official. Conor only did one thing wrong, he got wound up and in front of his mates he blurted out something that incidently would be physically impossible to do, and got labled a thug.

After that rant he apologised to all concerned except Deana. WHY, becasue he probably thought he would be giving her more ammo to play the victim roll with, but probably becasue he knows she isnt the forgiving type. Most gamers dont throw their trump cards away in favour of normality. He might also genuinely not want to talk to her, I know I wouldnt feel comfortable debating with someone who uses everything they can to gain a gamer advantage, so he avoids her, his right.

I am really struggling to say anymore but i have left some literary errors and bloopers in there for you to cherry pick for your comeback.

Patricia4 15-07-2012 10:47 AM

Connor did one thing wrong opened his mouth when he maybe should'nt of he does'nt like Deana and she dose'nt like him so I see no crime. I would rather live with Connor than her she a two faced girl and is a person that love's herself more than anything or anyone.

MrWong 15-07-2012 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patricia4 (Post 5304937)
Connor did one thing wrong opened his mouth when he maybe should'nt of he does'nt like Deana and she dose'nt like him so I see no crime. I would rather live with Connor than her she a two faced girl and is a person that love's herself more than anything or anyone.

Why do Conor apologists try to whitewash his behavior?

It wasn't one wrong thing. He also threatened to get Benedict at the wrap party.

Seems like Conor handles disputes with violence. Mindless cretin that he is.

sampvt 15-07-2012 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patricia4 (Post 5304937)
Connor did one thing wrong opened his mouth when he maybe should'nt of he does'nt like Deana and she dose'nt like him so I see no crime. I would rather live with Connor than her she a two faced girl and is a person that love's herself more than anything or anyone.

Patricia4 behave yourself, dont you know that conor is the devil reincarnated and you are not allowed to defend him. Better you say nice things about the lovely faultless and prestine Deana. :dance:

MrWong 15-07-2012 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 5304959)
Patricia4 behave yourself, dont you know that conor is the devil reincarnated and you are not allowed to defend him. Better you say nice things about the lovely faultless and prestine Deana. :dance:

..... Or she could accept that it wasn't just 'one wrong thing' :xyxwave:

smeagol 15-07-2012 11:05 AM

conor is racist scum

joeysteele 15-07-2012 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patricia4 (Post 5304937)
Connor did one thing wrong opened his mouth when he maybe should'nt of he does'nt like Deana and she dose'nt like him so I see no crime. I would rather live with Connor than her she a two faced girl and is a person that love's herself more than anything or anyone.

I'd far rather be around Conor than Deana too, they are both good housemates in their different ways but I would know exactly where I was with Conor whereas with Deana I would need to watch my back all the time not being able to trust a word she says.

She also, Mr Wong, herself says, she does nothing in her profile statements as to going into BB, she says she hates washing,ironing and cooking,that her Mother does everything like that for her when she is hee in the UK and in India she has servants, most housemates through from Luke S,Benedict even, yes Arron and Conor but people like Ashleigh too have said she does little in the house and their comments went further as to at the time Lydia was in the house, the comments were that her and Lydia did nothing else but plot and scheme with Deana doing little in the house as to chores etc;

As I say, that was not a criticism, it was just a fact, many housemates of the past have made little contribution to the cleaning etc; of the house, most of theml did well in BB though.

My point was that Conor far from being a Saint though he is,is in fact little different from Deana and her ways which makes her just as far from being a Saint too.
I don't think I have yet heard Deana apologise for anything,even the lies she has told to get people into trouble,( like Arron in the main), she hasn't even ever had the courage to admit she even could have done anything wrong there.

One persons faults shouldn't, in my view anyway,be constantly highlighted while the selective ignoring of the others faults. Deana like Conor has many faults, some equally as bad as his are too.
As do most of the housemates and in fact as I likely do as well.

rayheartbliss 15-07-2012 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 5304734)
I have come round to Deana as a housemate and quite like her as a housemate, she does nothing, she hates washing up, she doesn't cook, she won't iron or anything, that still likely annoys them.Although I now like her as a housemate, she is not a person I would like at all or trust.

Conor, knows full well,from his own observations and from others, that she with Lydia was plotting and scheming behind his back along with their plotting aginst Arron too. For no reason at that time whatsoever.
He is also still likely against her because she chose him as the only male housemate to put up for eviction after they had been in the house for around 1 hour only.

Had I been him,in the house, I would not have an ounce of trust to put in Deana, she still couldn't resist going to Luke A and starting on about him staying,another attempt to run him down, even when he was totally ignoring her.
Last week she was relieved the way the great British public saved her as she said, well they did the same to Conor this week, sadly Deana cannot find any graciousness at all as to his victory on friday so tries to begin the plotting again right away,it must be really frustrating for her not to be able to talk directly about nominations.
She is also concealing tha fact she also actually nominated Shievonne, the person she now claims she wanted to stay.Amazing double standards.

Deana is far from perfect, she is a backstabber and a liar much the same as most of them can be in there, she doesn't shout and swear that much, although that is creeping in a bit more now, but she is what is seen as a silent menace,(we have people like her at Uni and I keep well clear of them, they cause big trouble because they are so plausible the way they do it), she cleverly gets said what she wants to, whether its truth or lies and is convincing because she does in a reigned in and controlled way.she is still never -the-less doing it though.

Conor is also far from perfect, which his outburst so long ago in the series proved, however clearly the public don't hold that against him to any degree like the forums do.
He is not controlled like Deana he fires off on all cylinders, he has told Deana loads of times, they will never get on, he doesn't like her because he doesn't trust her.

He avoids her like the plague,she should do the same with him too.He is always going to rant at her, (she knows that full well too), that's how he deals with people he cannot trust and doesn't like,likely with men too.
She plots and schemes and then wonders what has she done wrong because she claims never to have spoken to him.
That says a lot too, if she has never really spoken to him, what basis long before his offensive outburst, did she then have to plot and scheme his downfall and set out to ruin his chances on the show.

These are 2 housemates that should be kept as separate from each other as is possible, putting them together for that punishment thing was ridiculous, they should have made him wash the laundry and her do the cooking for 2 days,since they are clearly not going to put housemates up for eviction automatically for talking about nominations.

In their own ways,they are both good housemates with most or all of the others, together a disaster,sadly that is the case sometimes with people.

Finally!!!

someone with real opinion! though i dont share the same opinion, props to you for actually backing it up!

coleman 15-07-2012 01:20 PM

Yes im Irish and would never stick up for Connor in a million years.
DEANA is a pleasant person. as was said here. Connor wont let up. I would hate to think what he would do to someone on the outside like this.

mikeuk22 15-07-2012 01:25 PM

He is a thug and a neanderthal and I can't wait to see him go!!!

Mikkigogirl 15-07-2012 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanessa (Post 5302057)
This was ages ago. And Conor has apologized. Is this the best his haters have against him? :bored:

Is that not enough?

It's was disgusting and he should have been thrown out for it.

In the meantime though he has gone on to show us just how horrible he is with his behaviour. He makes me sick, so much so that I joined this forum just so I could rant about it.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.