http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/...67_306x423.jpg


Yes look at the Camera you Punk
its going Worldwide

Going voluntarily to the police is likely only because he may have had a tip off they would be coming for him anyway in relation to this incident.

To be given the caution,he will have to have admitted committing an assault in a public place,had he been protesting his innocence or otherwise as to it being fun then the caution would not have been given to him and the matter probably taken further by the police.
To get away with a caution,he will have to have said he was guilty of it.

You mean like a call from "a friend in the force", perhaps someone in the same Freemasons Lodge, maybe a Chief Inspector ..... :conf:

Well really in fact ,it was said in the press too that the police were looking into the incident anyway so he would have been rather foolish to not expect them going to talk to him at some stage.
He did only go once the story came out and was made known.

Isn't it more likely that he was just invited to "attend for interview" as many celebrities, like Tulisa recently, are ?

There's no need for secret "tip-offs", surely - they belong in the world of snitches, grasses and frames.

Ugh! What a scumbag! :nono:

Indeed, that is a possibility too Omah, however if you read my post properly you will see I said he may have had a tip off,I did not say he had for certain.
No matter why,how or what the reason was he went to the police, he got a caution when he did for committing the assault.
That is enough for me.

I stated nothing for certain expect that he would have had to admit he committed assault to get away with that caution.
If he was innocent then he could have fought it had he wished to but he chose to take the caution and admit his guilt.

Having said that and really I shouldn't need to point his out, had he not gone after being invited to go by the police,then I think even he would have been pretty sure they would have at some point gone for him eventually since they were investigating the incident.

I agree and for me as others said too earlier in this thread, if he was so uncontrolled to do this in a public place then my concern would be what could go on in private.

My hope would be that Nigella keeps away from him with her sons too.His admission of guilt in this incident and receiving the caution from the police won't look good for him in any possible divorce.

I just really like Nigella though and I hate to see this unacceptable behaviour anywhere from anyone.

Even "may" implies that you propose the existence of an "unofficial communication channel" between the police force and a certain individual.

Nigella's children are Cosima Thomasina (f, born 1994) and Bruno Paul (m, born 1996)

May means might,if I say I may have done something or may go somewhere it does not imply certainty that I have or will.
Just as you saying it was more likely he was invited by the police to attend, that is not certain either and at this point in time not something you yourself know for sure to be the case too.

Best end this here Omah because I don't, with the fullest respect to you as both a person and member, enjoy much in the way as to debating with you.
My apologies for that too but I guess we are just people who are poles apart.

Well, I do like to get the facts right and try to resist speculation ..... ;)

So 19 and 17, not must older than my boys, I'm not sure what point you are making Omah, that she shouldn't be protective of them, maybe that is not what you meant.

AFAIK, one of them is a girl ..... ;)

I was pointing out to the poster that his statement was not entirely correct ..... :pipe:

No you don't you like to copy and paste omah :joker:

I wouldn't say she looks particularly distressed...
:conf:

I for one would hope the photographs are used if they do divorce, CCTV is covert? but my guess is images from those have been used in many court cases :)

Ah, that's because I am not a proponent of unsubstantiated assertion ..... :pipe:

Okay, I give you that one, I did type in sons so you can nitpick all you want as to that.
The news did state that she had left the family home with her son who was also there at the time.
I did actually for some reason think she had 2 sons to her first Husband, so I concede that to you.

Makes no difference whether they are girls or boys though,their ages remain the same and if this argument and incident was in anyway even partly about her chidren as some news state it was then still best to keep them away from him in my view.
As she should as well in my view.

The printed word could never be accused of unsubstantiated assertion ... :laugh2:

She should, the lad may well decide to grab him round his scrawny old throat haha!

But the lad may be bearing in mind his future share of Saatchi's fortune - currently estimated at £128 million.

It will probably inhibit any grabbing! ;)

It may well be uninformed idle rumour and speculation, too (see my KP thread ..... ;))

:xyxwave:

OK

Why would he, necessarily, have a "future share of Saatchi's fortune" ..... :conf:

Yeah, we can all chat sh*t... if you can get paid for it that would be sweet.

http://news.sky.com/story/1104943/sa...ution-was-best

Always best to consult the lawyer before "volunteering" for anything ..... ;)