There's controversial but Jesus Christ

:laugh3:

:joker::joker:
i'm too tired to think of anything controversial.. maybe tomorrow

omg how weird

I could believe this about HIV/AIDS - there is no logical reason why they haven't found a way to cure it. With cancer, there are just some cases where it's impossible (with current technology) to operate and therefore it's terminal, and there are so many types of cancer that there's probably not one cure-all... but with HIV/AIDS, they've got all the resources and there are cases of people being cured of it and people having a normal quality of life, so to me that suggests there is a cure, but it's being withheld...

Imma need y'all to stop justifying domestic abuse before I commit some domestic abuse

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-h...373/2013-01-03

I get she can be a bit of a twat, but in no circumstance should that make it okayor give him the right to do what he did/justify his actions. Perhaps it was like cases with 1000's of other people who have been the victim of domestic assualt, she was still too much in love with him/felt that he had learned from his mistakes?

:joker:

Following on from the Chris Brown thing, I believe it is perfectly acceptable for a man to hit a woman if she hits him first.

(not saying RIhanna did..dont know about the story besides seeing the photos)

You really can't justify it at all

Have you seen Rihannas face? Then did you see Chris Browns face, not a scratch. So I disagree with this tbh

It doesn't. I didn't say it did. What I'm saying is that, considering it was an isolated incident in their relationship, I believe she provoked him because of that very nasty side to her personality. They weren't together for a couple of years after the incident, and then they got back together. It's not like he beat her up and she kept going out with him regardless - it's different to an abusive relationship.

The clevland show?.....no.

Now that would be a different ball game

How can she slap???

I wasnt saying thats what happened there..I don't know enough about the whole thing to comment on that. Mind I will say that just because he had no marks, that doesnt necessarily mean she didnt go for him.

IF she did though, he went rather OTT in retaliation

When New York and her mum had a fight with Krazy and her mum and grandma, it was one of the greatest moments in tv history



"at that moment we both knew, Krazy is a *****, her mum is a *****, and her grandma is the biggest ***** that I have ever seen in my life!" :laugh2:

All FG spin offs are sucky
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-h...373/2013-01-03

But you don't know if she provoked him, you don't know what was said, so therefore I find saying 'I can see why Chris Brown hit Rihanna' doesn't have much basis to it. The whole 'nasty side' to her personailty just boils down to opinion, we don't know the ins and outs of the relationship between them.. maybe after that time she had forgiven him? It doesn't mean that she was at fault. The fact that he did so in the first place means that something there isn't right with him.

omg he battered the ****** out of her face I can't believe what I'm reading

:laugh: I cause some dropped jaws at times too, can't think why...

Geordie Shore is better than Jersey Shore

It's just my controversial opinion, I'm not trying to pass it off as truth, it's mere speculation on my part. Having witnessed abusive relationships in real life, I see a marked difference between sustained abuse and the isolated incident between Rihanna and Chris Brown. That's why I believe what happened between them is not quite as clear cut as people generally accept it to be.

If things happened the way I imagine they did, it's not like either party is going to open up and talk about it. If Rihanna said she was at fault, people would say she's defending him. If Chris said she was at fault, people would furiously accuse him of not being sorry. But the fact Rihanna consistently defends what he did, the fact they're back together and the fact he's never beaten her up since, suggests to me that while he does have rage issues, they're generally under control unless he's provoked. Not many people are angry for no reason at all.

Oh dear, I did not stand up for Chris Brown, I hate him for what he did. I was just saying I can see how people can lose their tempers at times, especially if they happened to be provaced with a bracket saying not that Rihanna did provoke him, so in general.

Yeah, but I believe she said or did something to piss him off. He was driving a car at the time, do you really believe he just suddenly flipped out for absolutely no reason and took it out on Rihanna? That doesn't mean she deserved what he did to him and it doesn't excuse him at all, because beating someone up is wrong regardless of why it happened, but it's my belief that she provoked him. If he assaulted her for absolutely no reason, she wouldn't be with him.