Yeah that's why Heidi and Spencer isolated themselves from everyone and just grumbled to each other talking ****. Soooooooooo fearless and wow she spoke her mind so much.

At least Speidi took them on though, they didn't turn themselves into victims.

I know she's bitchy, but she knows when she goes too far and always apologizes. I find her great to watch and i much prefer her to a dullard.

They were awesome!

lmfao how could Speidi have taken anyone on when they just complained to each other and avoided everyone else

Agreed, people pick and choose when it's okay to save an entertainer over a dullard though.

Some of the others also have potential, like Chris, for example. He's funny. :D

There's potential with Chris, I just don't know at the minute though there is something bugging me about him.

He's an actor and is using it to his advantage. Good for him!

Believe it or not, not everybody has the same opinion on what constitutes as an entertainer or a dullard.

So for example when Arron lost to Conor in BB13 you would actually say that Conor was more entertaining?

But Arron wasn't entertaining either...

Yeah I suppose you're right on that, I just don't know I was expecting more from him than his given so far I think.

He did way more than the Wannabe Rapist.

I think we will see more of him.

I found neither entertaining. At all. They irritated me in equal measure.

Though, I have to wonder what relevance this has to my post. I don't recall ever suggesting I found Conor entertaining.

Yeah but he didn't do anything good. Like, "doing something" doesn't impress me. Quality and content matters more, all Arron did was obnoxious pranks and irritate me and others. Loud asshole isn't an automatically entertaining trait.

I'm on about because you was saying that "people find different things entertaining" part of your post and you think that it's okay for Conor to have survived then? Even though he was horrible and boring.

lmfao yeah I don't even know how this turned into a Conor vs. Arron thing

That's a little irrelevant Mock...the poster didn't say who or what they find entertaining, just that people find different things entertaining. Which is ood as if we all agreed, the forum would be pretty boring and just a giant love in. You are entitled to like Helen and thinks she's entertaining, not everyone will agree with you, but they are just as entitled to find Jale entertaining

You didn't provide an example.

You said Jale has been unsociable from Day 1. That's you stating something, not providing an example.

Yes, what is entertaining / dull is subjective to the individual. For example, you found Rachel Rice boring, I found her endearing and remain glad to this day that she won. Neither of us are right or wrong, because we clearly value different qualities in housemates. When discussing who is entertaining in BB, we're dealing with opinions, not facts.

No, I don't. I didn't like Conor, and wanted him to be evicted every time he was nominated. Again, where did I even suggest anything like that?

I'm aware that what classes as entertaining varies from person to person. I have my view on the types of housemates who I like to watch, you have yours, others have theirs. That was my point. Obviously, some liked watching Conor, or else he wouldn't have survived at all. I don't feel the same as them, but that's the nature of opinions.

But yeah, I don't really know how we got into all this. I was simply stating how what you find to be entertaining / dull isn't the same for everybody.

it didnt get them anywhere, they didnt win