daniel-lewis-1985 |
28-06-2014 06:10 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeysteele
(Post 6991524)
I usually agree a lot with you but I wouldn't see the instances you list above as discrimination.
BB didn't just put them up,they were chosen in a haphazard way at times to be up for eviction,however there were always male housemates up as well.
Therefore the people who pay to vote had a choice of voting out a male or a female but used their money and time to vote out 3 females.
I said in my post earlier that giving only the females power would be discrimination only if in a later week BB doesn't give all the males power for a time too.
Since that would result in discrimination with only the males housemate up this week should there not be a week with only female housemates up.
For me however, BB is stepping in far too much and fiddling about with noms and saving this one and choosing that one.
Time they stepped out of the picture I think anyway, as to that for at least a couple of weeks.
|
Perhaps I didn't make myself clear sorry im still hungover lol I was implying that discrimination does not exist in this task its just that BB are stepping in because the show is at risk of losing its bigger characters.
The men this year are just wet so I don't blame BB at all for giving the girls the power, they are the only ones who can seem to form an opinion and not cry and throw a hissy fit when being nominated (barr Danielle in week 1 lol).
If the men had proven themselves and not let the girls rule the roost then maybe they would be the power housemates instead. Its because the girls have dominated the show and been opinionated whilst the guys pretty much lay low as to why they have been evicted first.
If the men want the power they need to grow some testicles and earn it!
|