![]() |
Quote:
|
Ok, so if attitudes have really changed for the worse, how come so many food banks can spring up?
These food banks are made up of charitable donations from schools, churches, businesses and the public, therefore showing we do care in general. |
I don't know what you mean about net curtains...
I doubt very much that one in sixty of the population cannot feed themselves. I wonder how many of those people smoke, drink, own a smartphone etc. etc...? In the 1940s people if you needed money you'd get a visit from the Relief Office and they'd point out which of your meagre possessions you should sell before they gave you a penny. Can't really compare that with today. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The change is that many are happy to see governmental support removed via 'spare room subsidies', sanctions to benefits, implement payment of a percentage of council tax from benefits and housing benefit caps but what does that in turn do? Puts huge amounts of pressure on communities to aid the poor in some areas the pressure then affects public services and the poor get the blame. High streets are full of shiny betting shops and pawnbrokers not reasonably priced butchers and grocers as they were, now we have the cartelesque supermarkets selling high priced low quality food. The energy companies keep people on low incomes on meters set at one of the highest rates. What should everyone do? Ask why they're doing it. |
Quote:
I've covered your 1 in 60 query, in order to sell something you first have to own it, if someone has a smartphone and a big telly on JSA they are most likely on HP,the difference then was it was impossible to get an unsecured loan for goods. Poverty and addiction has been an issue for years, it was prior to the 40s and it continues to be. |
Yes in order to sell something you do first have to own it. But I'm not talking about luxuries like big tellies and smartphones, in the 1940s you'd be required to sell your furniture, such as it was, a chair, some saucepans...
I've said all I have to say about this; it's impossible to compare need today to need in the forties. |
Quote:
'One resident is shown telling a journalist on the estate: “You talk about Benefits Street exploiting us, it’s the press that’s exploiting us. The Sun are exploiting the people who live here. “We stick together on this estate. What gives you the right to come down this road and take photos? We are not scum we are good people.” Producer Kieran Smith from Love Productions said: “It’s not a deliberate attack on the press but you know what, having made series one it’s quite hard to sit there and see the misreporting, the lack of factual argument that people put into the reporting of Benefits Street' http://www.theguardian.com/media/201...ess-series-two |
I just think 'some' people are greedy and expect too much sometimes ,even though times are hard , you can get a certain amount of pride from sorting things out yourself,I often see people standing outside job centers smoking and chatting on smartphones ,how can they afford that? I am all for helping people but not helping them to have a good lifestyle from being lazy.I have not seen anyone use a foodbank here,infact not sure we even have one.We all eat far beyond what we need to survive anyway.less food ,healthier people:laugh:
|
Healthier kids?
'Nearly 100,000 of the poorest children in the UK went hungry last year because their parents’ benefits were stopped or cut, according to a report by a coalition of churches. A total of more than a million benefit sanctions were imposed last year - sometimes simply because people were late for an appointment at the Jobcentre - although more than 120,000 of those decisions were overturned on appeal. Researchers found that more than 100 people with severe mental health problems a day were sanctioned. ' http://www.independent.co.uk/life-st...-10079056.html |
Quote:
People do use them sometimes once, twice and up to 3 times. Foodbanks can at present only be a temporary measure and it is all donated voluntarily from the kindness of other shoppers in the main. The point is that anyone needing foodbanks at all in the 21st century in the UK should make the UK powers that be feel really ashamed, it is beyond defending that anyone has to be so down, to have to rely on them in any shape or form. Volunteers at them are worn out with the ever growing numbers of different people and you have to realise,someone using them up to 3 times, means after them it is near always new people using them afterwards. Also, even at 1,000,000 usage, if it was assumed and we don't know,that this was in effect something like 334,000 actual people using them, that is still an almightly disgrace and should be a universal massive condemnation of this govt; that has let this happen over the last 5 years alone too. The cry that Labour had foodbanks too gets made, well fair enough but then that would also need counter balancing, if we all accepted it is 334,000 people with 1,000,000 usage now. Then as to Labour,who by 2010 had something like only 45,000 usage, that would mean only 15,000 people using them by the same token. It does not alter in any way, the justified criticism as to this heartless lot as to a massive rise in foodbanks usage over just 5 years. Labour's figure of 45,000 was at the end of 13 years of govt;,not just 5 years,where this present gov't has seen the figures soar to over 1,000,000. Or assuming it is people rather than usage, Labour's figure of 15,000 after 13 years of govt; as opposed to the Conservative led govt;of 5 years taking it from 15,000 to 334,000,well over a quarter of a million at least, in that very short time. Not a statistic I would like a party I supported to have as a fact. Foodbanks shouldn't exist in the UK at all and if the Conservative party win this election,with their unspecified extra welfare cuts to come of around 10 billion, they have only told us 2 billion so far. Then foodbanks and I feel sure those in poverty will see numbers soaring like never before,likely eclipsing the numbers rise of just the last 5 years. |
Quote:
I help out at one Kazanne,I for sure know they exist alright and I have near cried at the situations some of those desperate for their help are in. People also have to be referred to them by social services, a Church or a welfare organisation or charity. They cannot and do not just walk in and demand stuff. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know you are one of the most decent people on here and even in your 'harder' line at times, you still make valid points In fact on this thread, I have quoted things you have raised as very valid quite a lot. Some people desperately need to really on others however,my way is not to turn my back on those people. You said yourself,some people are bad with money,there are however less and less organisations with the 'time needed' now to ensure they get sorted out. Even if the usage of foodbanks is only around 334,000,that is no doubt in relation to the population a small number,however it is in my view a disgrace that anyone needs to use them in the UK,and as I said, they cannot just walk in to one, they have to be referred after they have been assessed as being in urgent/dire need. I think the 45,000 usage left in 2010 by Labour was totally unacceptable too, they didn't get my vote. A rise however from 45,000 to over 1,000,000 as to usage in just 5 years,well sorry, I would condemn massively anyone in power who presided over that. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
For me in any event, even a quarter of a million plus by a good margin is way too many and is a disgrace. Nothing at all for the UK to be proud of. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Her cafe opens tomorrow and I'm so happy for her. It will be nice for the homeless to have a nice and safe place to eat. |
Quote:
Yes I read up on it, the information is there for anyone who wishes to do so. Joey is young and he has always been into politics, we may be a little more socially aware. :blush: |
The fact that we need food banks is an awful situation, no one can argue against that. However, before saying the number have increased with the current government, one needs to examine the reason why. Is it because people are in more need? Is it because the criteria for being eligible has been relaxed? Is it because the current government decided that sufficient banks should be available such that people who need to use one have easy access to it.
I've said this before and I will say it again. Statistics can be manipulated to prove anything. We have a huge deficit, with both parties determined to wipe it out in the next 5 years. I hope people honestly don't expect the number of needy people to reduce in that period, because its just not going to happen, things will get worse, much worse, with either a tory or labour government |
Quote:
|
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainme...Ha?ocid=LENDHP
America have them too !! maybe the tons of food wasted they mention could be used in some way http://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainme...Ha?ocid=LENDHP |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.