Noooo you're confusing it again :laugh:

I get that you think implementing parts of the US format into the UK one would be entertaining and I get that you don't care if someone's strategy is ruined because of that.

All I'm asking is why you said 'yes you can' to Tom saying you can't make BBUK a strategic game if you still keep the public vote. In your last post you just said you don't think you can, I just wanna know why you said 'yes you can' if that's not what you believe?

He said having a public vote in a strategy based game wouldn't work. If BBUK had elements of BBUS in it then it could be classed as strategy based. So I said 'yes it can' or whatever because of the reasons I have stated many many many times on this thread.

It can't though, if the control over who's evicted is left to the public it remains a popularity contest. If you can spend an entire week playing comps and strategising only to not have any say on who actually leaves and for it to be left on a whim for the public to decide, you cannot possibly form any sort of strategy.

All it would be would just be a more rigid version of what we have now, with an HoH nominating people for personal reasons. That is not a strategic based game in any shape or form whatsoever. You may think it'd be fine and entertaining like that, but it still doesn't make it strategic which is what we're arguing about

Ok but I think it would work

Not really a justifiable argument is it though :joker: so looks like I'm right

No hun I just can't be bothered repeating the same arguments over and over again x

No, bringing in elements of BBUS to the BBUK format doesn't make it 'strategy based'.

Then why have you dragged this out for three pages? :joker:

You clearly can't justify your point! We've explained many times why it doesn't work.

Let Gregor live!

After seeing two seasons of Big Brother Canada, I can safely say that the BBUK format is so much better. More crazy people, less nominations talk.

The HMs are nothing to do with the format really.

Well yes they are. They can't put people like Shahbaz, Science, Ahmed and Nikki (lol) in to BBUS because there too unhinged and it wouldn't work. BBUS need proper strategic sensible people, BBUK relies on the entertainment of the housemates.

No US version at all, people like Marc will always get the power and target innocent people not threats. It'll flop

Their messy gameplay would be TV gold!

But it wouldn't be game play, whatever. I don't want it that's all.

I know

Because either you haven't been getting my point and I tried to explain it to you or you're just arguing with me for the sake of it. Either way there's no way we are going to convince eachother so I'm over it.

Welp I've justified my point approximately 463738 times.

BBUS has had far more unhinged people than BBUK has ever had :laugh: it does and can work, in fact if there's anything BBCan 4 has proven it's that personality led casting is far superior to the typecasting BBUS likes to do

If you cast crazy people like you do for BBUK, it actually makes the format far more entertaining because you get people targeting each other for personal reasons and being pissed off when they're nominated etc etc. The two go hand in hand with each other

It's the other way round :joker: you said 'yes you can' and 'I know you can't make it a truly strategic game with a public vote' but then contradicted yourself on several occasions

That's the whole reason why I suggested introducing some aspects of BBUS to BBUK, because it creates entertainment. But in my opinion there should still be a pubic vote.


Whatever, you know fine well what I mean, you're really clutching at straws to find something to argue with me about.

People who want the American format should move to America then we will all be happy

I know! I have never once said you haven't said this, nor do I disagree :laugh: all I'm arguing is that if you keep the public vote it is not a strategic game . If you don't want it to be then that's fine, there's no discussion here, but you said it still would be and it wouldn't

Not in the slightest :shrug: I've said numerous times I get you don't care about strategy, I get you just want entertainment, I get that you just want parts of the US format implemented

What I don't get is you saying that keeping the public vote still makes it a strategic game, then saying 'I know you can't make it a truly strategic game with a public vote', then saying you can and so on and so forth, you're the one that has complicated this

Pay for my flights and then sure, happily :hee:

welp I'll make my position on this clear for you. although introducing BBUS elements would make it somewhat strategic i realise that it wouldn't be 100% strategic as the public could ruin someone's strategy or whatever. Such a small thing to be arguing about but there we go.