Peoples character is judged by their behaviour, and part of that is what they write and put their name to. Copying that information so that others can make their own judgement on what is published does not mean they agree with it unless they say so, or they were the original writer

It's always poor Hayden's threads.

Stick to Lost hun.

Not true. You responded to about five posts that came after mine before the thread got locked.

You wiped the floor with nobody, especially not the facts I presented you with

He sounds a right charmer.
No doubt if he still has the same attitude he will get voted out anyway.

i feel like C5 may cover it up like that **** in a fridge incident

:joker:

The BB17 thread, the last one, this thread

Quite a track record

Unless they want him purposely for his controversy to bring attention to the show, like with Winston.

Please stick to the topic of thie thread.

70% no. I think that just about says it all.

:joker:

And here ladies and gentlemen, is the post which says it all

Goodnight.

You go to bed early. Headache?

It's two different threads so to carry on a debate from the last then use a statistic from this thread is absurd.

%70 of us said no to eject someone on day 2 because of this past comments.

Most of us dont believe that someone has a right to speak with pure hate that offends millions of people without the consequences

I don't think he should have entered in the first place if they already knew like Tila she shouldn't have entered so it's only fair to eject him. I'm going to judge him on what he is like during the house but I would also like to see his tweets expose like they did with Winston. It's only fair.

Just because 70% say he shouldn't be evicted doesn't mean they in anyway agree with the tweets. I'm sure if there was a poll on that the result would be very different

Omg at those tweets :omgno:

Totally agree :clap1: (And I agreed with Tila's ejection, for the record)

From reading your posts? Yeah

Firstly what he said was a long time ago and to a friend on social media, not the show, so that's a strange thing to do, seeing as how you are always banging on about judging people on what they do on the show and secondly I don't really spend a lot of time following your views and opinions because they are virtually all verbatim and generally about homosexual issues which is understood, accepted and very well discussed TO DEATH. in closing, we get your point ok, now enjoy the show for what it is, entertainment and arguments. Most of us don't give a toss about what someone said when you were still at school Jack.

Yeah that's true, I think my point made more sense in my head

:clap2: :clap2:

I ask tough questions don't I. Sorry.

Neither deserve/d to be ejected tbh.

In case you missed it, I've already said I think people jumping down Andrew's throat for comments he made four years ago is a little over the top. I've also said he, just like Tila, shouldn't be ejected for comments made outside of the house, only those made inside. So why you're preaching this to me is a little confusing - yet again it seems I've encountered someone who doesn't read threads through before they post in them. The comments are being discussed because people on this forum are agreeing with them now, in the present, that's all.

And for your information, I wasn't in school four years ago.

Yep! Tough questions which you receive detailed answers to and then ignore

I pose such tough responses don't I? Sorry

Do you really?

:joker:

I want my justice
https://uploadir.com/u/hlv9lfpt