Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 10874488)

Well at least its content is far more interesting than those that just give a one line dig at everyone constantly and an inability to debate.

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10874409)

There is a lot more to being a senior member of the Royal Family than ribbon cutting, as Meghan found out and quickly bailed. It's hard boring work.
All high profile people get abuse from the press occassionally, especially when they seem to thrive on attention, as Meghan does. She left the UK for a quiet life, right?, but she keeps popping up by jumping on the latest bandwagon like clockwork or suing people.
Strong people just ignore the press clamour, like the Queen and Kate, who is said to have a spine of steel. I can well believe it, with 19 patronages, sporting organizations, and her and Wills own foundation to take care of, plus 3 young children. Thats what I call strong and independent,earning your keep, and all that.... not sponging off billionaires and celebs like Oprah you didn't even know previously for accomodation and work who wouldn't give you the time of day if you were just that whats - her - name actress in that legal drama thingy that her ex got her into.

Once again, it will be the influence of others who will get her something to do.
Watch this space. :hee:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10874410)

Still in denial then? Or is love really blind? :joker:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10874496)

Love?
I think you'll find there's only one of us feeling passionate emotions about 2 people we don't know, strong enough to continue to fuel hateful essays about them.

And it's.... you.

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 10874485)

Because becoming part of the Royal Family you take on a role or job if you like aswell as being a wife, husband, mother, father so your response is niave. Any job or firm you take or join has rules, dress code, expected behaviour and that includes the Royal Family because perhaps you can appreciate they are not just any family. The priviliges you get...a home, chefs, dressers, cleaners...it goes on and on. They want for nothing and it all gets paid by the tax payer.
Sadly there are a generation of people who think they can just dive in and do things the way they want to with NO RESPECT for anybody but themselves.

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10874503)

LOL.

Oh give over with the high drama, you trouble maker you. :nono:

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 10874511)

Relying on low rent gossip rags to fuel a hatred of someone you don't know and will never know is bizarre.

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10874512)

Then stop with the passionate essays for people you claim to not care about.

Otherwise... people will think you care. :eek:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10874518)

The Daily Mail? Really?

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 10874511)

Relying on low rent gossip rags to fuel a hatred of someone you don't know and will never know is bizarre.

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10874524)

The Daily Mail what? You don't believe the excerpt about Archewell then?

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10874527)

The usual, paint by numbers, unimaginative response to opinions and ideas that don't match your own.

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10874529)

Do I find tabloids who report gossip based on "sources" truthful? No.

Do I find anything in the article reason enough to slate Harry and Meghan? No.

Trademark applications are very involved. It being returned because they've missed things out is not unusual. Tabloids taking innocuous information and turning it into a series of insulting articles is also not unusual.

But... people latch onto anything to justify irrational hatred. I remember the shocking.... DOG WALKING article.

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10874535)

The reporting of the Archewell foundation app being rejected wasn't gossip, it was factual. Where in the article were they 'slated'?

IMO missing signing the document in particular is pure incompetence. Is no -one advising this pair? :huh:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10874536)

You... were using it to slate them. You... brought it into a discussion thread about Meghan's treatment by the press.

Unless you believed it to be relevant to that you wouldn't have shared it.

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10874540)

It shows that the Press often just report facts....and how they didn't point out how incompetent the pair of them were to miss out even the signing of a document supposed to be extemely important to them. They could have made much of that one if they wanted.

Originally Posted by Moniqua (Post 10874490)

it’s no secret that hateful white people age like milk...but do you i guess? :joker:

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 10874511)

Relying on low rent gossip rags to fuel a hatred of someone you don't know and will never know is bizarre.

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 10874511)

Relying on low rent gossip rags to fuel a hatred of someone you don't know and will never know is bizarre.