Yes could be from Covid-19 Death
which is in USA prisons

with all due respect all we know is that Andrew allegedly had sex with a 17 year old girl which is not illegal? so what are you locking him up for exactly?

The woman claims that she was forced to have sex with him which is illegal

But if she never gets to court like Nicky is suggesting, Andrew will never be called as a witness to prove one way or the other :shrug:

I wouldn't be surprised at all.

They'll want her dead before she starts talking and dropping names.

I am finding the year wait with her in full view all the time in a lit room very dodgy, if she ends up being diagnosed as mentally ill and unfit for trial, job done, no trial and no inconvenient witnesses

I'm not agreeing with Nicky that he shouldn't go to court I'm just clarifying that what is alleged is illegal, if it was all above board why would he even deny meeting the woman when there's clear photographic evidence that he did? this whole discussion is pointless anyway, there's not a hope in hell Andrew will ever see the inside of a courtroom, lets be honest, even if Ghislane accuses him of being involved

They'll probably give her a covid suffering cellmate

Yeah and if nothing comes of that an unstable violent one and should that not work the guards will forget her and the cameras will shockingly turn off and she will commit suicide.

also video evidence now against Andrew, what i had read more recently

A year long wait in those conditions is quite insane, she will never make it to her court date. They should have had her in court asap.

she will be deemed unfit and never make it to court, she will then be moved to a 'mental institution' and in time people will forget about her and she will be freed is my guess

That would be a nice an easy solution for everyone involved(a part from the actual victims of course), it would make your blood boil

I know

everyone is assuming she will tell the truth, and we should remember that each person she implicates makes her own role in it more severe and likely to result in a longer sentence. Nothing is going to come from this, it will still be she said this and they said that

...it’s being reported that she’s secretly married but won’t reveal who her husband is...I wonder if the trial is a year away because she’s pleaded not guilty.../...if that then requires longer time for the not guilty case to be made../..I don’t know how these things work in the USA...

the prosecution said that they would need 2 weeks to present their case so the duration was likely to be 3 weeks, so the court then needs to schedule on that basis. Also the defense (and prosecution) need time to prepare, collect all the evidence that is then reviewed by either side ... it all takes time. I think the seriousness of the charges also have a bearing on the time frame

...I don’t think she’ll be kept in solitary confinement for the entire year and definitely not with things like the light on 24hrs a day/paper clothing/no bedding etc...It’s a bit confusing because I’m sure I read somewhere that she had a ‘roomie’ already...and both of those things can’t be true, that she has a roomie and that she’s in a solitary unit...

ITTLE ROCK, Ark. — Federal officials were so worried Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime confidant Ghislaine Maxwell might take her own life after her arrest that they took away her clothes and bedsheets and made her wear paper attire while in custody, an official familiar with the matter told the Associated Press.
The steps to ensure Maxwell’s safety while she’s locked up at a federal jail in New York extend far beyond the measures federal officials took when they first arrested her in New Hampshire last week.

The Justice Department has added extra security precautions to help prevent other inmates from harming her and to stop her from harming herself, the official said. Protocols put in place include ensuring that Maxwell has a roommate in her cell, that she is monitored and that someone is always with her while she’s behind bars, said the official, who could not discuss the ongoing investigation publicly and spoke to the Associated Press on condition of anonymity.


...the Los Angeles Times...

Not if she gets a plea bargain on the condition that she does name names

...it shouldn’t end with her, this wasn’t just two people...it should be all of those ‘rich and famous’ who were part of the abuse...

I wonder are those alleged recordings still knocking around somewhere

...ugghhhh, I just think if they existed then wouldn’t she have already used them and kind of given herself up to offer them as a deal...hiding the way she did when she has such a bargaining tool to manipulate her freedom
basically...

Unless she's worried she might end like Epstein if she threatens to out some of these people, I mean we know one potential name involved is the Queen's son

...is Trump meant to have any involvement also, wasn’t he friends with Epstein at the time...hasn’t she mentioned tapes of ‘powerful US politicians’...