ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Meghan Markle wins privacy claim against Daily Mail (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=373376)

LukeB 12-02-2021 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10998777)
Huh? :huh:

I mean he wouldn’t get the same treatment as Meghan because women and men are treated differently and it’s mostly the women getting all the abuse.

Josy 12-02-2021 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 10998759)
Well you can say the same thing about Meghan supporters having toxic hate against her father who we know even less about....

Well that's just it, theres no need for toxic abuse or hate at all, dislike for people in the public eye is fair enough and is understandable but pure hatred is just OTT

jet 12-02-2021 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LukeB (Post 10998781)
I mean he wouldn’t get the same treatment as Meghan because women and men are treated differently and it’s mostly the women getting all the abuse.

Imo that's nonsense. People are individuals and their actions matter, not their gender.

LukeB 12-02-2021 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10998784)
Imo that's nonsense. People are individuals and their actions matter, not their gender.

No it’s not nonsense at all it’s common knowledge. Women get the most of it and the men get little or none. No one is treated equally at all.

AnnieK 12-02-2021 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 10998780)
no-one normally has their family relationships plastered all over the press, so I don't think anyone can judge who was right or wrong between Meghan and her father. I'm not actually sure why anyone cares, it's nobody's business but theirs :laugh:

Completely agree.

Things happen within families.....that no-one actually knows the full extent of unless it directly involves them. I have personal experience of this....my brother and I almost fell out after my mum died over something that happened whilst she was dying that I didn't tell him about to save his feelings but as he didn't know that, my behaviour seemed pretty cold hearted. Once explained it was all sorted but had that been splashed over the papers first, it would have been relationship over for us I'm sure

jet 12-02-2021 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 10998780)
no-one normally has their family relationships plastered all over the press, so I don't think anyone can judge who was right or wrong between Meghan and her father. I'm not actually sure why anyone cares, it's nobody's business but theirs :laugh:

Then they all need to stop leaking stories about their relationships to the likes of People mag and the Mail - and in Meghan's case stop approving books that tell even more about it. :hee:

thesheriff443 12-02-2021 11:22 AM

There is no obsessive hate for Meghan on this forum she has as many people that like her as dislike her.

She has won a court case that involved her father so in my eyes she hasn’t won anything of any real value

rusticgal 12-02-2021 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LukeB (Post 10998773)
It wasn’t exactly a good comment :shrug:

Because she isn’t a criminal, she hasn’t done anything wrong and she hasn’t done anything problematic not like you can judge since you wanted trump to free a dangerous criminal. People are offended by anything she does... people even made an issue over the whole ‘husband and I’ thing. It does get toxic here and social media. It’s a fact and not exaggerated


...and it wasnt a bad one either...I even used her favorite word :laugh:

Why are you talking about Trump on a Meghan post...Josy wont be happy :shrug:

You dont have to be a criminal to be disliked. IMO she has done things wrong she has been disrespectful and I think she is a hypocrite ...I dont like her and I have yet to find anyone that does apart from on social media. There are many people I dont like...and there will be many you dont like and have a negative opinion on...that doesnt make you toxic unless you call them vile ugly names. People have their reasons for not liking her...just agree to disagree and stop exaggerating and over using the word TOXIC...its childish.

rusticgal 12-02-2021 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10998766)
Anyone who I've seen on here talk about her father is always just doing so in response to people saying how awful Meghan is to him


With equally 'Toxic' comments....that was my point.

Niamh. 12-02-2021 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 10998805)
With equally 'Toxic' comments....that was my point.

I would disagree with that personally

LukeB 12-02-2021 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 10998802)
...and it wasnt a bad one either...I even used her favorite word :laugh:

Why are you talking about Trump on a Meghan post...Josy wont be happy :shrug:

You dont have to be a criminal to be disliked. IMO she has done things wrong she has been disrespectful and I think she is a hypocrite ...I dont like her and I have yet to find anyone that does apart from on social media. There are many people I dont like...and there will be many you dont like and have a negative opinion on...that doesnt make you toxic unless you call them vile ugly names. People have their reasons for not liking her...just agree to disagree and stop exaggerating and over using the word TOXIC...its childish.

Just saying :shrug:

She hasn’t though nothing bad to justify OTT hate :shrug: I do dislike people but you don’t really see me constantly saying anything negative and clutch at straws in every Katie Hopkins and others thread. I hardly say anything at all so no It doesn’t make me toxic. I’m not exaggerating.

rusticgal 12-02-2021 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LukeB (Post 10998769)
yeah I agree with that tbh. It’s just ugly women getting the most of it and the men get’s hardly anything. 2021 and sexism is still a thing


Calling her UGLY is very toxic....talking of men hardly get anything....when LT bought her father into the debate it was all wrong....:hee:

LukeB 12-02-2021 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 10998814)
Calling her UGLY is very toxic....talking of men hardly get anything....when LT bought her father into the debate it was all wrong....:hee:

I didn’t call anyone ugly :shrug: and I started off with addressing the father stuff to everyone then you quoted me and I’ve seen you made comments about the father stuff.

Josy 12-02-2021 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 10998802)
...and it wasnt a bad one either...I even used her favorite word [emoji23]



Why are you talking about Trump on a Meghan post...Josy wont be happy :shrug:



You dont have to be a criminal to be disliked. IMO she has done things wrong she has been disrespectful and I think she is a hypocrite ...I dont like her and I have yet to find anyone that does apart from on social media. There are many people I dont like...and there will be many you dont like and have a negative opinion on...that doesnt make you toxic unless you call them vile ugly names. People have their reasons for not liking her...just agree to disagree and stop exaggerating and over using the word TOXIC...its childish.

Why wouldnt I be happy? Just because jet posted something doesnt make it true, it was already explained up the page that theres not a problem with threads going in other on topic directions that's the natural way a debate works.

My point was clear in that some people who dislike Meghan were saying things along the lines of 'yeah but what about her dad's privacy' etc instead of actually just agreeing that everyone is entitled to the privacy they request to have and leaving it at that, because seriously who can even honestly think that someone winning a privacy case against a newspaper is in any way a negative thing at all? It's just flaberghasting tbh

rusticgal 12-02-2021 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LukeB (Post 10998812)
Just saying :shrug:

She hasn’t though nothing bad to justify OTT hate :shrug: I do dislike people but you don’t really see me constantly saying anything negative and clutch at straws in every Katie Hopkins and others thread. I hardly say anything at all so no It doesn’t make me toxic. I’m not exaggerating.

There is no hate...there is no toxicity...its just dislike.
Thats up to you if you dont want to discuss Katie Hopkins on every thread...but you can if you want. That doesnt make you any better than me or less toxic.

LukeB 12-02-2021 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 10998825)
There is no hate...there is no toxicity...its just dislike.
Thats up to you if you dont want to discuss Katie Hopkins on every thread...but you can if you want. That doesnt make you any better than me or less toxic.

It would make me toxic though :shrug: too much hate is toxic and obsessive but I choose not to go down that route. It would help you so much, if you dislike someone that much why would you want them living in your head rent free? it’s so easy to not comment at all and move on it’s very healthy

rusticgal 12-02-2021 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josy (Post 10998822)
Why wouldnt I be happy? Just because jet posted something doesnt make it true, it was already explained up the page that theres not a problem with threads going in other on topic directions that's the natural way a debate works.

My point was clear in that some people who dislike Meghan were saying things along the lines of 'yeah but what about her dad's privacy' etc instead of actually just agreeing that everyone is entitled to the privacy they request to have and leaving it at that, because seriously who can even honestly think that someone winning a privacy case against a newspaper is in any way a negative thing at all? It's just flaberghasting tbh

Well you contradict yourself there Josy...a debate naturally takes you in different directions which is why her father came into it....I dont know why you would feel flabberghasted :shrug:....

thesheriff443 12-02-2021 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josy (Post 10998822)
Why wouldnt I be happy? Just because jet posted something doesnt make it true, it was already explained up the page that theres not a problem with threads going in other on topic directions that's the natural way a debate works.

My point was clear in that some people who dislike Meghan were saying things along the lines of 'yeah but what about her dad's privacy' etc instead of actually just agreeing that everyone is entitled to the privacy they request to have and leaving it at that, because seriously who can even honestly think that someone winning a privacy case against a newspaper is in any way a negative thing at all? It's just flaberghasting tbh

Winning a privacy case against a news paper because you don’t like what was written but happy for your privacy to printed in another magazine because it showed you in a good light is why people don’t applaud her win against a newspaper

It’s not about privacy for Meghan it’s about having control of what is written.

Josy 12-02-2021 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 10998828)
Well you contradict yourself there Josy...a debate naturally takes you in different directions which is why her father came into it....I dont know why you would feel flabberghasted :shrug:....

I dont contradict myself at all actually, if you go back and read the posts between myself and jet you will see that no one said what you seem to think...

And like I said I'm flabbergasted that anyone could think that an individual winning a privacy case against the newspapers could in any way be spinned to be a negative thing.

AnnieK 12-02-2021 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesheriff443 (Post 10998829)
Winning a privacy case against a news paper because you don’t like what was written but happy for your privacy to printed in another magazine because it showed you in a good light is why people don’t applaud her win against a newspaper

It’s not about privacy for Meghan it’s about having control of what is written.

That's the way privacy laws work though. She is able to sue the newspapers....as are you if you so wished....to whatever end she likes. I'm sure if something negative and damaging to you was posted on here and you reported it, it would be removed but you would not report a post saying you were amazing and the best member ever. Its human nature not to want to negative attention and the way privacy laws work you can do something about it :shrug:

thesheriff443 12-02-2021 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 10998839)
That's the way privacy laws work though. She is able to sue the newspapers....as are you if you so wished....to whatever end she likes. I'm sure if something negative and damaging to you was posted on here and you reported it, it would be removed but you would not report a post saying you were amazing and the best member ever. Its human nature not to want to negative attention and the way privacy laws work you can do something about it :shrug:

The privacy involves the same letter in which he friends told the magazine it was a peace offering when in reality it was not.

You can’t have it both ways it’s either private or it’s not

GoldHeart 12-02-2021 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 10998620)
He didn’t seem to handle it well...but considering Meghan spewed on about the lack of support and guidance she got ...what guidance and support did he get...NONE.

I was unaware you were such a close personal friend with the royal family and Meghan's dad , what's it like ??.:whistle: anyone would think you had inside gospel information.

The fact that Meghan's dad showed his true colours in his little cash grab documentary ,speaks volumes that people still blame Meghan .

Him and Meghan's sister both come across very bitter and unhealthy in the way they air their dirty laundry and the way they conduct themselves ,but yeah it's all Meghan's fault as she's the devil oops I forgot :notimpressed: .

And as mentioned before this is a private sensitive issue which shouldn't be plastered all over media with twisted narrative . Non of us will ever know the full details , but to me it seems there's resentment and jealousy . And the judgemental unfair treatment of Meghan is just typical .

rusticgal 12-02-2021 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josy (Post 10998783)
Well that's just it, theres no need for toxic abuse or hate at all, dislike for people in the public eye is fair enough and is understandable but pure hatred is just OTT


Its not OTT though....its just opinion.

There is no toxic abuse or hatred....people really need to get a grip with the dramatics...its laughable.

...and by the way I only used the toxic word as a response to the post..

Glenn. 12-02-2021 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LukeB (Post 10998769)
yeah I agree with that tbh. It’s just ugly women getting the most of it and the men get’s hardly anything. 2021 and sexism is still a thing

It’s even worse when the toxicity towards Meghan comes from grown men.

Tom4784 12-02-2021 01:08 PM

At the end of the day, her father sold stories about her, he sold private letters, he tried to profit from his own daughter's wedding. You can't both sides this and make out that people are just as toxic to her father when it's not the case. Her father isn't in the news every other day, there isn't articles slamming him for holding his belly, there certainly wasn't any comparable articles to when the tabloid rags slammed her for saying something like 'My husband and I'. The only times he has been brought up has been a result of his own wrongdoing towards his daughter. He actually did something to deserve the bad press and the criticism while people bend over backwards to find reasons to hate on Meghan, to try to make out that both are similar is just the most disingenuous bull****.

If this was anyone else, no one would be on the father's side, absolutely no one, but because it's a mixed race american woman who had the audacity to marry a prince, people are accepting the gaslighting because they think it gives their irrational, crazy hatred of this woman substance when it does not. It just highlights how far gone people are.

Oh, and since I already know the responses to this post, I'll just tackle the predictable 'Meghan fan' response that gets dished out to anyone that isn't cutting letters out of a magazine to send her death threats. You don't have to be a fan of someone to see how they are treated is bull****, but you do have to hate someone deeply to the point of irrationality to go against the grain of reality to find reasons to justify hating someone like that. As I said before, if this wasn't Meghan, the people who are defending the father would not be doing so because it's clear as day that he's looking to profit off his own daughter. The fact people are saying 'Everyone deserves a right to privacy but....' to try to justify a reason for Meghan's privacy to be invalidated just says it all.

Take a breath, step away from the computer and just look inward. The hatred towards this woman is not normal behaviour.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.