Couldn't give a toss about any of the 'royals' tbh

You could doubt half the world with those ridiculous examples.

Harry has a dodgy uncle, hes married a liar.and a bully,he hurts horses for sport, and has done for years...shall we investigate the funding of the invictus games.?

That's how stupid it's got.

If it's revealed the funding is millions in cash from middle eastern countries sure.

Its qatar who have no human rites issues.

Meanwhile at the invictus games.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ms-dealer.html

so we're back to deflecting to unrelated matters, it was fun to discuss Charles' dodgy dealings whilst it lasted :skull:

Like you did when you brought up the cost of Kate and William's air travel for their tour - until it was revealed that Harry and Meghans air travel for their S. African tour cost even more....:smug:

It was part of an article someone posted in relation to Charles, perhaps you didn't read it because you were too busy thinking up excuse to make on all their behalf

https://i.giphy.com/media/U67CajqFIjiDSACi5i/giphy.webp

Hmmm....

[Injured British troops competing in Prince Harry’s Invictus Games are to wear the logo of the UK’s biggest arms exporter in an ‘immoral’ sponsorship deal condemned by veterans and humanitarian campaigners.

Members of the Invictus UK team will wear shirts with the logo of BAE Systems for the first time when they compete at trials in Sheffield later this month after the company paid a six-figure sum.

The arms manufacturer has sold billions of pounds of weaponry around the world, including to Saudi Arabia for its war in Yemen, which began in 2015. Since then, many thousands of civilians have been killed or maimed amid allegations of war crimes…..

…..Last month Prince Harry spoke of the need to remove the scourge of landmines.
‘If he wants to promote peace then he should consider how he feels about the involvement of the UK’s biggest arms companies in an event like this.

‘It would very hard to think of a less appropriate partner than BAE Systems – it is akin to having a cigarette company sponsoring Cancer Research or having Dracula sponsor a blood bank.’]
..................
Thank God for William and Kate, the really decent Royals with morals and integrity.

The cost of their tour had nothing to do with Charles, he wasn't on the tour. So can I say I'm bringing up Harry because he's Charles's son? :hee:
What is your opinion on the Harry/Invictus games sponsership BTW? You didn't say.

Did YOU not get the brief? :conf:

That quote from Rusti was her reply to Jordan who had once again brought up Kate and William with this:

:laugh:

As if you would need to find an excuse to bring up Harry (or Meghan), your obsession is common knowledge :skull:

I don't really have much opinion on something from years ago that has only being brought up now to deflect from the actual topic but I imagine those who felt strongly against it refused to take part? maybe you can scour the daily mail archives for a riveting follow up.

The Charles thing was years ago. You're so unaware or oblivious in several different ways that its quite funny. :hehe:

I would say boring, but each to their own.

"The Charles thing" is CURRENT news as it's only just been made aware to the public. Bad post to be calling someone else obvious in :joker:

Stop trying to engage with me and go do something exciting with your life then if you're bored :pat:

No point I engaging with you, you seem to think this is blood money, whennits a simple gift from a very nice bloke from a country with no human rites issues.

Your main issue is its blood money, you made a big song and dance about it earlier in the thread.

It's being proven it is not blood money from one of the dodgy nations, or from a dodgy source..

Yet when it has been shown that Harry's invictus games is part funded by arms dealers you say nothing about it, you just lift your massive carpet and sweep the latest **** under it.

No human rights issue in Qatar... where being homosexual is illegal. Of course you would think that.

It was reported years ago, its being regurgitated again now for some reason :suspect:
Parmy made us aware of the Harry/Invictus games disgrace. Something doesn't have to be in the press before it can be referred to and an opinion on it given.

Where/when was it first reported? All current articles imply this is new information that has come to light :conf:

Or Meghan accepting very pricey earrings gifted by a Saudi Crown Prince and wearing them to a formal dinner weeks after he had ordered the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

Years ago, like I said. I'd heard it all before. I believe it was even in the bio of Charles by Tom Bower. How would they only be finding out now about something that happened 7 - 10 years ago...

It was foolish but these things happen nothing to see here etc... :hee: