Holly is toast as well I think, she will be tarnished by the association ..yuk

She is aware of it
he had a job at ITV


https://thebritaintimes.co.uk/wp-con...JS42330765.jpg

These are very serious allegations.
Will be interesting to see what happens when the NDA expires.

Phil's Boyfriend
also with the young lad.



From
https://www.politicalite.com/exclusi...elly-insiders/

[Politicalite has approached ITV for comment,
but has not yet received a reply.]

Another Younger Lad with Phil

https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/16569...jpg&name=small

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tv/20048160...-revenge-porn/

there is nothing new in all this stuff. Something else has triggered Holly

[Phillip Schofield gave character reference which
was used in court for pal who pleaded guilty to revenge porn offence]

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tv/20048160...-revenge-porn/

seems to have started with the brother's paedo case

Phil's contract expires in the summer, so they just wont renew it and that will be that

While someone Phillip's age dating someone Matthew's age does feel somewhat creepy ... just because they encountered each other some years before, doesn't mean they were involved for the entire time.

They probably weren't actually physically involved the entire time but that doesn't mean it isn't grooming... grooming is what comes before actual sexual contact - the gaining of trust, affection, a but of coercive control etc. so even if he "waited" for this kid to be of legal age before actually "going there", it's still grooming.

When older people get together with much younger adults and have known that person since they were a kid that's always a massive red flag.

i don't know about anyone else, but when i meet someone as a child, even as they grow to an adult, they are still in my mind a child. I can't fathom how you could then make that person a sexual partner unless you had a screw loose

By "involved" I meant any communication tbh. If they'd been in contact it would absolutely feel as though Phillip were grooming him, as you said.
But if they met again later? Still creepy, as when they first met Phillip was an adult and he was a child, but not quite the same.

Is there any actual proof that any of this about Schofe is true? Or is it just random rantings of the bigots that dug up this ‘dirt’ coincidentally after he announced his sexuality before a national paper did?

I’m not a fan of his by any means, in fact his downfall has been a long time coming, but I’d prefer it to be about his general attitude and behaviour, rather than some conspiracy theory about him automatically being a groomer because he decided to be honest about his sexuality

The facts about the show runner have been out there since Phil made his big announcement. There is nothing new being reported.

The only thing thats new is that he and Holly appear to have fallen out. That's the only thing that anyone knows :laugh:

What facts about the show runner? No assumptions, or theories, what facts?

He and Phil had a relationship is the basic fact

A relationship? And that’s a known, proven fact, how?

The Workers in that ITV studio.

Bloody hell, bet the tabloids are loving this,i dont know much about it only what Ive seen on here,but there is no way I would believe those rag tops say.

They say gay guys have "gaydar" or whatever, surly lots of people suspected he was gay before he came out?

I always assumed he was gay tbh, had no idea he was married to a woman. But then i knew nothing, and still know very little about his personal life.

I guess it can been seen as "seedy" but as long as these blokes he's alleged to have relationships with are over 18, there shouldn't be a problem really, right?

From what i've seen from both, which isn't too much, can't say i care for either Phil or Holly tbh.

it is for his wife and children

Is it alleged he was seeing other fellas when he was married then? I honestly don't know that much about this story.

Does seem like him and his brother both like young lads though.