ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   meghan Markle launches limited edition Jam, sends to 50 "influencers" (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=390874)

rusticgal 25-03-2025 10:20 AM

On another note I really don't get these photo's of people who clearly want to protect their children's identities and think we are all interested in looking at the back of their heads...:shrug:

Glenn. 25-03-2025 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11618250)
On another note I really don't get these photo's of people who clearly want to protect their children's identities and think we are all interested in looking at the back of their heads...:shrug:

One of the reasons she began to be so hated was because she refused to show you all her new born baby.

jet 25-03-2025 08:58 PM

It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid) and heard more about them in the last few weeks than we did in 3 years.

Crimson Dynamo 25-03-2025 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11618443)
It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid) and heard more about them in the last few weeks than we did in 3 years.

She is and it's no surprise. She has used her father and sister in a similar way

Chilling

rusticgal 25-03-2025 09:35 PM

Nothing more left in the pot….its time to opt for the ‘private life’ they both desperately craved.

Glenn. 25-03-2025 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11618443)
It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid) and heard more about them in the last few weeks than we did in 3 years.

No one is entitled to see their children.

Redway 25-03-2025 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11618443)
It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid) and heard more about them in the last few weeks than we did in 3 years.

They’re children. They have a legal right to privacy.

Crimson Dynamo 25-03-2025 09:54 PM

Meghan Markle Posts a Stunning New Photo of Archie and Lilibet in Her Garden

Crimson Dynamo 25-03-2025 09:54 PM

Oops

rusticgal 25-03-2025 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redway (Post 11618451)
They’re children. They have a legal right to privacy.


No one said they didn’t…

Redway 25-03-2025 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11618455)
No one said they didn’t…

“It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid)”

Glenn. 26-03-2025 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11618455)
No one said they didn’t…

And the thread when Archie was born was dripping with anger and entitlement.

Cherie 26-03-2025 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11618462)
And the thread when Archie was born was dripping with anger and entitlement.

are you really trying to kick start an argument about a 5 year old thread....

jet 26-03-2025 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redway (Post 11618451)
They’re children. They have a legal right to privacy.

Privacy for the kids until she is pushing an important money spinning venture, like the 2022 Netflix documentary. Out came little Archie, face and all.
Now that she is desperate for this latest venture to succeed, she has mentioned details about the kids at least a dozen times in the last few weeks. She’s just a struggling working Mom, don’t you know.

Crimson Dynamo 26-03-2025 09:00 AM

what on earth:shocked:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gm20rrJW...jpg&name=small

Mystic Mock 26-03-2025 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo (Post 11618514)

What's wrong?

Glenn. 26-03-2025 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11618471)
are you really trying to kick start an argument about a 5 year old thread....

No babe I was stating fact. People were outraged, angry and entitled when Meghan had Archie. Seems pretty appropriate to bring up now her kids are the topic of conversation.

rusticgal 26-03-2025 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redway (Post 11618456)
“It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid)”


Whats that got to do with your comment though...about rights to privacy. No one has said they dont have rights to privacy :shrug:

rusticgal 26-03-2025 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11618471)
are you really trying to kick start an argument about a 5 year old thread....


Its exactly what he is doing. :sleep:

Glenn. 26-03-2025 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11618557)
Whats that got to do with your comment though...about rights to privacy. No one has said they dont have rights to privacy :shrug:

Because of what jet said….

God forbid we see their faces.

No one has any entitlement to the children’s faces.

rusticgal 26-03-2025 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11618556)
No babe I was stating fact. People were outraged, angry and entitled when Meghan had Archie. Seems pretty appropriate to bring up now her kids are the topic of conversation.


It was about breaking with tradition...get your facts right.

Glenn. 26-03-2025 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11618558)
Its exactly what he is doing. :sleep:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11618556)
No babe I was stating fact. People were outraged, angry and entitled when Meghan had Archie. Seems pretty appropriate to bring up now her kids are the topic of conversation.



As you ignored the response and instead choose to try and come for me.

Very on topic to be discussing the vile entitlement of that baby that day was sickening. A sign of the unhinged behaviour that has snowballed.

Glenn. 26-03-2025 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11618560)
It was about breaking with tradition...get your facts right.

It’s the same thing. It’s the parents decision to show their baby to the world. And you guys hated that they didn’t and excused your unhinged entitlement as “she’s breaking tradition”

It’s weird as ****

rusticgal 26-03-2025 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11618559)
Because of what jet said….

God forbid we see their faces.

No one has any entitlement to the children’s faces.


It was clearly said in jest...and you have both turned it into something else...but if its the best you can do then carry on....anyway who is interested in seeing the back of people in a photograph....:laugh:

Glenn. 26-03-2025 11:35 AM

The “it was a joke” line

Debate over I think :joker:


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.