![]() |
Have I got news for you should be decent tonight.
|
Diane Abbott is 70 years old with a "serious long-term health condition". Is she really the best person for the job?
|
She caught the grandeur didnt she?
|
|
One rule for arseholes.
|
there is no upper age limit for working. There used to be, but then they stopped providing enough cash for many pensioners to live in reasonable comfort
Ultimately, it is up to the selection process and the voting public to decide if the person is up to the job |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Better the devil you know type attitudes. |
Quote:
Trump looked like a broken man, he talked some absolute batcrap and was rambling like a fool for 45 mins. Biden did 45 seconds of prepared uninspiring monologue and was then asked a question and he looked like a rabbit in the headlights Why are people voting for people not up to the job |
What is her health condition?
I noticed she was tremoring a lot when speaking the other day |
Quote:
Kept Secret |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Then she had the trauma with her son a while back. Then of course the vile comments about her by that Con donor. However, I'm left puzzled, after her activities this week it astounds me she wants to stand in this election again FOR Labour. She knows the procedures of the Labour Party and the NEC likely better than anyone. She was under suspension. Once the investigation was ended and then the recommendations finalised later. She was restored to the Labour whip with her MP status. She knows full well that in a coming election she needs then to be reselected by her constituency. Which also was done and in place. So she knew, then as with ALL the other potential MPs and candidates the next stage is the NEC rubber stamps the candidates for the election. However she's chosen to create an almighty fuss over the last few days. Trashing the Labour Party for it's treatment of her and particularly Starmer too. So in light of that, why she would then want to seek election as an MP to have Starmer as PM and Labour in government. Is puzzling. After her public outburst. I actually do agree with Livia here, she unfortunately doesn't seem like she would give 100% for both personal and health reasons now. |
Loyalty to the party and it's leader is demanded, and Diane has shown that. Maybe she just feels she deserves to be treated like someone who has served for 37 years, and not as a political pawn for Starmers Stalinist purge of any dissenting voice.
Even Blair had dissenting voices to contend with, and he didn't cry about it constantly, because even Blair understood that labour should at least pretend to represent different voices. |
Why is this dude fit to be a lab candidate to the party faithful, but Diane isn't? Seems like a weird hear no evil, see no evil approach to what is actually happening, as opposed to what folks want to believe is happening.
Starmer was Mr. Reverse brexit in 2019, now look at who he wants to have on his side...
|
Quote:
|
that's politics for you
|
…it’s still a game for the boys and the ladies that the boys have approved to be on their team…:laugh:…
|
Quote:
With labour about to have an unassailable majority, we do need at least a few in the party unafraid to criticise the tory policies they have already vowed to continue. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.