Well all I'm gonna say on the matter is that you've just done what you accuse countless others of doing. Maybe I'm not the one who can't tell the difference? Perhaps you need to realise that the distinction you've stated in your last few posts can extend to others too.

Even better! :dance:

As BB is a Ch4 show it needs to reflect all kinds of social groups be it gay, straight, black, white, male, female, old, young etc

I'd prefer it if BB stopped stereotyping gay men, black women, blonde bimbos etc because there are as many straight-acting gay men as there are camp straight men (Luke BB9)

The straight HMs, as much as the gay HMs need to tone down their attention-seeking so we can have down-to-earth, naturally entertaining 'normal' straight AND gay people

Yes - others that have also missed the point! LT did make it clear that he didn't want people put in there BECAUSE of their sexuality - which has long been the case! Character NOT sexuality!

Can I just say that if you implying people who are not straight or 'normal' are "extremes", then i think that is a sh*t comment!

Just what is 'normal' anyway?

no

only those who miss the point

everyone wants to see good people but BB keep feeding us sexual stereotypes at the expense of personality, thinking short term. These people always end up rubbish as they define their person by their sexuality and we soon find out they are poor to watch.

I want BB to stop using sexuality as a means of determining if a person is interesting and have faith in more balanced people who represent the population more.

I notice in the BB advert all they could get Nadia to do was a simulated sex act - is that all she/he is about?- i doubt it.

and with most browsers having an on the spot spell and grammar check there is no need for mistakes which as this is a written forum can spoil a post

everybody **** and dance

http://www.gifbin.com/bin/1237576060_funny_dance.gif

LT's point is quite clear, He doesn't want the stereotypical HM's. He just worded it horrifically really.

if i had time and if this was an essay that counted for an exam i would have done better, granted


but it does help to attract a bit of debate if there are ambiguities..:devil:

"No gays, no bi's, no gobshytes, no weirdos"

Irrespective of what he wrote the title is plain worng and offensive!

haha this thread reminds me of when lois ran for mayor on family guy and peter made t shirts lol

This is what I think.

Would it be ok if the OP put "No disabled people" - or "No black people" ?

:joker:

i need to buy that shirt lol

damn goes tomorrow's thread


thanks a bunch

(and if all the black people were like makosi i would)

Hahaha.. *dances like a crazy person*

Big brother's core audience are women and gays therefore these are people we relate to!

Big brother is a personality contest so therefor i want a house full of great personality and unlike you LeatherCrumpet am not pigeon holing people or judging everyone by steriotype.

And my spellin mistakes spoil this post?

Well that dirty ***** in your avatar with her nipples showing and a face full of botox is spoiling this post more

peace out x

True, there are better titles but then again it brought attention to it didn't it? Chances are he had that as the topic title so it'd get noticed.

As for his point, I disagree. As long as they provide entertainment the HM's can act how they like.

It happens to be the quote under the Logo of Richmond Council in SW London.

In the end - people will read into it what they want! Maybe some are just over-senstive about it! :shocked:

Sorry to spoil your next offensive thread. :rolleyes:

What is up with your post pic as well? [del]A woman[/del] Madonna with a see though top, considering this website is used by 10 year olds...

Big brother's Kore audience are women and gays


:joker:

when will you be 11?

And you believe that?

13+ actually - although that picture is nothing compared to the language and type of convos others indulge in!

haha cant wait for the 'no black or disabled people' thread :joker: in fact for fun lets try and think of the most offensive tread title lol

il go first

*I know mikey is blind but surely he knows he looks like a paedophile* :joker:

In fairness the rules do state that you have to be 13 to join and Kylie Minogue's boobs are hardly gonna corrupt the youth of today.

Take LT with a pinch of salt, He's just playing you up.

When will I be 11?

Oh, you have got me so wrong. Grow up pal, and while you on this 'learning curve' start to learn how to stop your homophobic and childish remarks!

probably 3%

lol

Personally i think this forum should be for 16+

Its Big Brother a programme where women get their tits out, housemates have sex and use words such as f u ck c u n t s l a g etc lol

Its big bro not the power rangers

Some have expressed the same - but many current members are below that age - and would obviously be unhappy at being booted out!

i agree


a minimum IQ level should be set

Yea I do agree with that, however we all know that just because a film has "18" on it, that some 8 year old will inevitably watch it.

i think it should be 18+ and you have to post a picture of your pubic hair to prove you are over 18

dont shoot yourself in the foot Leath...lol :laugh:

:shocked::shocked:.