![]() |
Daily Mirror update
5.55pm The focus of the interviews with Mr Bridger has been trying to find any information about where April is, Det Supt Bevan said. The senior officer would not reveal what the 46-year-old had said to avoid jeopardising the search. He told reporters: "He has been interviewed twice. Clearly, our focus in those interviews, as it is in this whole inquiry, is to find April. That is primarily what we've been discussing with him. "What I don't want to do is compromise the investigation or any chance of finding April, so unfortunately I can't divulge exactly what he's told us so far." |
With how long it's taking I have a very bad feeling about this.
|
Quote:
Just what i thought |
yes, they must be pretty sure to be focussing all their efforts on him. I think any sentence given should reflect the fact that he refused to talk as well. Creepy.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ah right, any reason why you think that arista? I was searching earlier for articles stating he wasnt talking and couldnt find any, and this most recent one doesnt say that either. Just curious.
|
Quote:
He has now talked a bit (of course Police will not say what) but at the start he refused info was on SkyNews Live. The Police going near that River I assume has come from him. If she is in a out building or Shed then she could be alive. |
Quote:
of you live near there you can help look for April #findapril |
Ugh. According to DS sky news were interviewing the suspects SON earlier. His son who has only known him a year. And who is under no type of suspicion whatsoever (well, not to the police. Some at DS have decided that because he was scratching his ear during the interview he is guilty :rolleyes: )
Obviously everyone wants this child to be found, but reporters and such need some ****ing boundaries tbh. |
Quote:
|
How is it a job for the Army :conf2:
|
Quote:
|
Pro. Police are doing the Searching
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
and also volunteer not pro but there helping |
The Police are more trained for things like this than the army are
|
Quote:
Unfortunately, children go missing every day, if the army got involved in every case, all they would ever be doing is searching for lost kids... |
Quote:
|
this is not a lost kid but a kidnapped child,
in these cases every resource should be used, |
Quote:
|
Quote:
it was ok for them to be used for the olimpics but not to search for a missing child! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yes that's exactly what I think they should do
|
Quote:
beacuse we have the police |
I'm sorry but this is a stupid argument
|
Quote:
it shows that you would not want to use the army in the slim chance that it could help save a 5 year olds life beacuse you think its the police's job not the army. |
What the **** are the army going to do that the Police can't do already? they have a job to do elsewhere they aren't mastered in things like this
|
Don't even know if your being serious or not
|
The police are trained for things like this, for situations like this, it is part of their job and part of the duties they are assigned to do, that is not true of the army. Why don't we send out firefighters and ambulance crews to search as well eh?
|
Send in all the Sniffer dogs around the country i say
|
Quote:
|
Only TiBB could make a thread about a missing 5 year old girl turn into an argument.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
what war is the whole of the army fighting in this country? the army are trained in searching for the enemy hidden camps tracks ect ect.. more men can search more area's faster. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.