ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   The UK PM Expels 23 Russian diplomats (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=336548)

Brillopad 17-03-2018 11:08 AM

Why the UK believes it was Russia.
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-e...-it-was-russia

A fair and reasoned assessment which is why so many have come out in support of May on this.

DemolitionRed 17-03-2018 11:22 AM

So now we have 23 British diplomats expelled from Russia with further threats from May and Putin.

The Chemical Weapons Act page 9, section 2, clearly states that evidence (as proof) must be available, so how is May refusing the Russian embassy requests to collect evidence?

bots 17-03-2018 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed (Post 9920965)
So now we have 23 British diplomats expelled from Russia with further threats from May and Putin.

The Chemical Weapons Act page 9, section 2, clearly states that evidence (as proof) must be available, so how is May refusing the Russian embassy requests to collect evidence?

Genuine question here DR, why are you so keen to see things from a Russian perspective, when its UK citizens that have been attacked?

I lived and worked in Russia, have many good Russian friends, but I still side with the UK in the face of an outrageous attack

DemolitionRed 17-03-2018 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 9920982)
Genuine question here DR, why are you so keen to see things from a Russian perspective, when its UK citizens that have been attacked?

I lived and worked in Russia, have many good Russian friends, but I still side with the UK in the face of an outrageous attack

Good question

1) I want to see things from all sides and not be blinded by the one sided hysteria.

2) I'm not going to roll over and believe everything that's said. I can't because different papers are saying different things. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/13/w...ist/index.html Some papers are asking why there weren't further investigations and asking why Russia is being refused evidence whilst others are riding on the back of patriotism and saying May was absolutely right.

3) As I'm not the only person asking these questions (there's a lot of us) we don't see it as siding with Britain or Russia, we see it as an open and frank discussion with all questions answered.

Kizzy 17-03-2018 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 9920864)
Surely thats emotional blackmail though?

You could just as easily ask do you want to risk your children being affected by another hit on the streets of the UK by not responding?

No one wants armed conflict, no one has suggested it yet as I understand but we have a military to be prepared to protect citizens.

If using military grade nerve agents on our soil on a busy street is not a reason to lock down and protect citizens then what is? (Disclaimer obviously if it can be proven to have been a government ordered hit)

That's the point... It hasn't been proven, you can't condemn one man for saying what he did, even if every one else is throwing their hands up in outrage because at the minute he has every right to make that point as there is no evidence to the contrary.

Brillopad 17-03-2018 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 9921010)
That's the point... It hasn't been proven, you can't condemn one man for saying what he did, even if every one else is throwing their hands up in outrage because at the minute he has every right to make that point as there is no evidence to the contrary.

Weren’t you accusing Russia of interfering in the American elections because you didn’t support Trump?

AnnieK 17-03-2018 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 9921010)
That's the point... It hasn't been proven, you can't condemn one man for saying what he did, even if every one else is throwing their hands up in outrage because at the minute he has every right to make that point as there is no evidence to the contrary.

I didn't condemn him, I queried his use of language? As none of us or the media are privy to the intelligence gathered and no military action has been threatened to my knowledge I felt it was an inflammatory thing to say to the public. Not one of us outside of the government has a say in this and trying to whip up opposition by pulling on people's heartstrings seems wrong to me.....although the fear mongering from some tabloids also deserves derision too.

This whole situation is a mess, there are far too many what ifs, buts and maybes

Tom4784 17-03-2018 01:07 PM

The difference being the election business is and has been investigated and that situation isn't likely to be escalated further until the investigation is complete. I do think that Russia is behind this but I won't slate anyone for wanting to be cautious and verify the facts before we throw ourselves into a potential war situation.

I don't think people should surrender their views to 'get in line' with everyone else.

Brillopad 17-03-2018 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 9921044)
You have a one-track mind Brillo. This issue is not about May or Corbyn and the obsession (not just from you, from many people, including the tabloid media) with trying to make it about May/Corbyn/Tories/Labour politics is bizarre.

I think political leanings have a lot to do with it for some. Otherwise I don’t think they would give two hoots about Putin and whether he did it or not, especially as there is more than enough reason to believe he did.

I have my own opinion on who exactly has a one-track mind!

Kizzy 17-03-2018 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9921027)
Weren’t you accusing Russia of interfering in the American elections because you didn’t support Trump?

There has been media speculation around several elections and referendums that may have been influenced by AI and bots, I don't know where they originated.

kirklancaster 17-03-2018 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 9920587)
I see your point but the trouble is that this fits into a long pattern of Russian behaviour which has been going on for years. I think everyone agrees now that they were behind Litvinienko but there's also been numerous suspicious deaths that they were probably responsible for both in this country and abroad. But every time it happens they just react with sarcasm and sneer at any suggestion they were involved. A lot of their reaction is pure trolling. It's not just assassinations either, look at stuff like the passenger plane that was shot down over Ukraine where everything pointed to it having been shot by the Russian backed rebels on the ground but Russia kept on denying everything and put forward a load of dodgy evidence that a Ukrainian jet had shot it down instead. And they've been caught trying to pass off video game footage as 'evidence' in the past as well

Basically they just can't be trusted to take any incident like this seriously so it's pointless to indulge any of their excuses

:clap1: Great post as usual.

Kizzy 17-03-2018 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 9921046)
I didn't condemn him, I queried his use of language? As none of us or the media are privy to the intelligence gathered and no military action has been threatened to my knowledge I felt it was an inflammatory thing to say to the public. Not one of us outside of the government has a say in this and trying to whip up opposition by pulling on people's heartstrings seems wrong to me.....although the fear mongering from some tabloids also deserves derision too.

This whole situation is a mess, there are far too many what ifs, buts and maybes

It does give a little perspective to the situation though doesn't it?
Makes you rationalise a little better
THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!! .....YEAH!
WE SHOULDN'T STAND FOR IT!.... NO!

ALL YOUR KIDS SHOULD SIGN UP IMMEDIATELY!! .... er, hang on a minute :/

We shouldn't accept this rabble rousing reactionary politics, we need examination, discussion, evidence before there is a response.
All this 'we should get behind the govt' Why?

Twosugars 17-03-2018 03:02 PM

there won't be any war over this, any talk of a war is just hysteria

Russia sabotaged the Litvinienko investigation so I wouldn't be involving Russia in any investigation now. It's enough for UK to get confirmation from un chemical weapons inspectors who arrive on Tuesday.

Kazanne 17-03-2018 04:31 PM

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...cid=spartanntp

She's done what needed to be done I think.

Northern Monkey 17-03-2018 04:43 PM

This was most likely the Russian government and i think most people would agree including myself but I think it’s a perfectly reasonable position for people to question things with situations as volatile and important as this.Specially after Iraq.There’s always that 1% chance that there’s another explanation.Like a leak for instance.
I didn’t agree with Corbyn politicising this,going on about diplomat cuts but I don’t think anybody should be getting criticised and called unpatriotic for trying to look at this objectively.
Yes there will be silly conspiracy theories but i think they’re quite easy to weed out.

Kizzy 17-03-2018 06:34 PM

Why destroy your stockpile if you were going start killing people?

https://www.opcw.org/news/article/op...ons-stockpile/

Twosugars 17-03-2018 11:55 PM

Don't believe they destroyed everything.


In other news British intelligence services warn that a cyber attack by Russia on British financial system or utilities may be coming
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...reprisal-grows

Northern Monkey 18-03-2018 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 9921783)
Don't believe they destroyed everything.


In other news British intelligence services warn that a cyber attack by Russia on British financial system or utilities may be coming
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...reprisal-grows

I don’t know.I heard an interview with the Russian ambassador to Britain saying that a cyber attack from Britain would be seen by Russia as an act of war.
If that’s how they consider it,Would they do it to us?Basically declaring war.
Unless maybe we’re doing it to them?May did say that there might be other measures which she can’t discuss publicly.
Scary.

Nicky91 18-03-2018 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey (Post 9921840)
I don’t know.I heard an interview with the Russian ambassador to Britain saying that a cyber attack from Britain would be seen by Russia as an act of war.
If that’s how they consider it,Would they do it to us?Basically declaring war.
Unless maybe we’re doing it to them?May did say that there might be other measures which she can’t discuss publicly.
Scary.

russian ambassador to Britain hmmm, i feel a next victim of poisoning coming :suspect:


Putin must be stopped, him and his regime :fist: :fist:


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.