ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Meghan and Harry have a new daughter (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=375948)

Marsh. 09-06-2021 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swan (Post 11056417)
Im saying the institution in this country is the royal family, or at least it's centred around them. So when you say the 'institution' regarding this matter, who are you referring to exactly?

You can say the press as they would fall under the 'institution' but when don't they fuel any fire, regarding anything?!

What Harry and Meghan need to accept is it works both ways, they can't have it all their own way. Using the press for photo ops in Uganda with starving kids is all good and well, celebs do this often to promote their own brand, but they can't turn around and have a tantrum at every time the press are critical of them either.

None of that bears any relation to anything I said. Sorry.

Swan 09-06-2021 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 11056420)
None of that bears any relation to anything I said. Sorry.

Then what are you saying, maybe i missed something? :shrug:

You didn't really say anything in the post you asked me to address.

Marsh. 09-06-2021 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swan (Post 11056423)
Then what are you saying, maybe i missed something? :shrug:

You didn't really say anything in the post you asked me to address.

Yet you decided to quote it and pretend I'd said something else. :shrug:

I don't need to explain my post, it's self explanatory.

Swan 09-06-2021 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 11056418)
The institution is the "business" side, very different from the "the family". I would imagine most senior Royals know very little of what goes on day to day, HR issues, hiring and firing of staff, daily running of the homes etc etc. They have staff for that....same as any business.

Yeah in many ways i agree. But the family are the business, without the individuals, there is no business.

The Government is an institution, who do we blame when things go wrong in the country, injustices, failure? We blame the individuals heading the Government, not the institution itself.

The waters are very mucky when in comes to humanistic issues. 'Institution' is to vague a word with matters like this imo.

joeysteele 09-06-2021 06:24 PM

The Queen was shamed into making an eventual statement on Princess Diana.

She should be now.
How any Great Grandmother can allow this speculation to continue, to be there to be brought up possibly now all through this new born child's life.

Actually I as a Royalist am appalled she hasn't just issued an official statement from herself.
I think it's pathetic of her.

smudgie 09-06-2021 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11056320)
The queen's father, King George VI, affectionally gave her the nickname Lilibet as a small child, and the only person to reportedly call her this name in recent years was her late husband Prince Philip.

Incorrect.
Her family and friends called her it in private.

Marsh. 09-06-2021 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 11056438)
The Queen was shamed into making an eventual statement on Princess Diana.

She should be now.
How any Great Grandmother can allow this speculation to continue, to be there to be brought up possibly now all through this new born child's life.

Actually I as a Royalist am appalled she hasn't just issued an official statement from herself.
I think it's pathetic of her.

Pathetic is the right word as their silence on the matter has been the issue from the start. No wonder members get frustrated.

Beso 09-06-2021 06:58 PM

The queen wasnt shamed into making a statement at all..

The queen remained silent to protect the boys..

The public bullied her into a statement

Crimson Dynamo 09-06-2021 07:49 PM

The palace’s refusal to deny BBC royal correspondent Jonny Dymond’s report that Her
Majesty was "never asked" her opinion on the couple’s decision to name the baby after
her childhood nickname speaks volumes about the ongoing disconnect between the
institution and the Sussexes’ stateside operation.

Royal aides have become increasingly vexed by Harry and Meghan’s representatives -
both official and self-appointed - claiming to speak for the 95-year-old monarch when
they are in no position to do so.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-fa...ance-sussexes/

Glenn. 09-06-2021 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smudgie (Post 11056441)
Incorrect.
Her family and friends called her it in private.

Which came from her father…

joeysteele 09-06-2021 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 11056445)
Pathetic is the right word as their silence on the matter has been the issue from the start. No wonder members get frustrated.

It is pathetic Marsh.
What Great Grandmother of any decency would want to see headlines in gutter trash publications reporting negatively on her nickname being given to her new addition to her family.

I would doubt the Queen is the only one called Elizabeth who has had that nickname.

This is her newest Great Granddaughter, yet in years to come it's likely these headlines will be shoved in this child's face.
How can any Great Grandmother just sit back and allow this to build.

If she has even a scrap of decency she should speak out now against any publication or people making negative comments on this child's name.

She should be proud to see it continued.
Not have this negative welcome fuss about her new Great Granddaughter.

thesheriff443 09-06-2021 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11056486)
it was because she could not say Elizabeth. it's not a given name.you may as well call a kid fuzzywuzzy or snookums

to call their child this tells you all you need to know about this pair

:facepalm:

No one really knows what that little old lady thinks, probably fed up with all the fuss.

joeysteele 09-06-2021 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11056477)
Which came from her father…

I think it may be found it came from her Grandfather King George V. originally.

smudgie 09-06-2021 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11056477)
Which came from her father…

It was her Grandfather that started it.
Gone on for a few generations.
Her best friends and ladies in waiting still use the name in private with her.:shrug:

Glenn. 09-06-2021 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smudgie (Post 11056515)
It was her Grandfather that started it.
Gone on for a few generations.
Her best friends and ladies in waiting still use the name in private with her.:shrug:

So before her friends then…

joeysteele 10-06-2021 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smudgie (Post 11056515)
It was her Grandfather that started it.
Gone on for a few generations.
Her best friends and ladies in waiting still use the name in private with her.:shrug:

You are correct.
It goes back long before Prince Philip took it on.

Crimson Dynamo 22-06-2021 03:30 PM

Dan Wooten exposes the lies
 
Here's the timeline of events which, in my opinion, make it abundantly clear they didn't give a damn what Her Majesty thought:

May 31: Harry and Meghan buy the website LiliDiana.com.
June 4: Meghan gives birth and the couple immediately purchase LilibetDiana.com.
At some point between June 4 and June 6: Harry claims he speaks to the Queen to seek approval for the use of her pet name.
June 6: The name is announced to the world via press release.
June 9: Palace sources tell the BBC the Queen was NOT asked about naming their daughter Lilibet by Harry and Meghan. She was merely informed.

Now who do you believe?


The act of crass commercialisation that gives the lie to Meghan and Harry's
claim that they asked the Queen's permission to name their daughter after
her


full details here:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...bets-name.html

bots 22-06-2021 04:08 PM

Dan Wooten exposes lies has got to be the best one yet :laugh:

Crimson Dynamo 22-06-2021 04:15 PM

more damning evidence here:

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s decision to buy a 'Lili Diana' website almost a week
before their daughter's birth and 'Lilibet Diana' on the day she arrived indicates they had
'already made up their minds' on the name before speaking to the Queen, a royal expert
claimed today.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art....html#comments

staggering

Liam- 22-06-2021 04:15 PM

Dan Wootton could tell me that grass was green and that water is wet and I still wouldn’t trust a thing the rat said

user104658 22-06-2021 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11062857)

Now who do you believe?

Only ever TRS* Sookie Baxter and she says the Queen knew and was over the moon.

*Trusted Royal Source

Marsh. 22-06-2021 05:10 PM

"Timeline of events"

:laugh2: Anyone would think it mattered.

Is it not possible for him to focus on actual news?

Anyone would think this 95 year old Great Grandmother is appalled to have great grandchildren named in her honour. :joker:

Crimson Dynamo 22-06-2021 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 11062895)
"Timeline of events"

:laugh2: Anyone would think it mattered.

Is it not possible for him to focus on actual news?

Anyone would think this 95 year old Great Grandmother is appalled to have great grandchildren named in her honour. :joker:

its his job :joker:

you may as well have a go at a teacher for not also working in the coop

they have other reporters covering ALL news

he is at the top of his game writing for the biggest online newspaper in the world earning 6 figures

lol

user104658 22-06-2021 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11062902)
its his job :joker:

you may as well have a go at a teacher for not also working in the coop

they have other reporters covering ALL news

he is at the top of his game writing for the biggest online newspaper in the world earning 6 figures

lol


Salesman of the year when it comes to peddling internet outrage? I mean, of course it’s profitable… internet outrage is big business. It’s unsurprising he’s making good money from it.

“It sells well” means nothing more than that though. It sells. That says absolutely nothing about the quality or accuracy of the content… people like trash that gets their blood pumping, human nature. The FACTS are usually just…mundane.

Liam- 22-06-2021 06:03 PM

Fidget spinners sold well, they didn’t bring anything worthwhile to the world either, just more junk

Crimson Dynamo 22-06-2021 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 11062913)
Fidget spinners sold well, they didn’t bring anything worthwhile to the world either, just more junk

when fidget spinners are still as popular as ever in 125 years time

get back to me

:pat:

Crimson Dynamo 22-06-2021 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11062912)
Salesman of the year when it comes to peddling internet outrage? I mean, of course it’s profitable… internet outrage is big business. It’s unsurprising he’s making good money from it.

“It sells well” means nothing more than that though. It sells. That says absolutely nothing about the quality or accuracy of the content… people like trash that gets their blood pumping, human nature. The FACTS are usually just…mundane.

and as you admitted yesterday, noone likes trash on this site more than you..


https://media3.giphy.com/media/3ohc1...VxhS/giphy.gif

user104658 22-06-2021 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11062917)
and as you admitted yesterday, noone likes trash on this site more than you..


https://media3.giphy.com/media/3ohc1...VxhS/giphy.gif


TELLY trash. If he pops onto Too Hot To Handle I’ll be there with bells on.

Watching my telly that is. Not also on the show.

user104658 22-06-2021 06:30 PM

ALSO Nicky likes trash more than me.

jet 22-06-2021 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11062857)
Here's the timeline of events which, in my opinion, make it abundantly clear they didn't give a damn what Her Majesty thought:

May 31: Harry and Meghan buy the website LiliDiana.com.
June 4: Meghan gives birth and the couple immediately purchase LilibetDiana.com.
At some point between June 4 and June 6: Harry claims he speaks to the Queen to seek approval for the use of her pet name.
June 6: The name is announced to the world via press release.
June 9: Palace sources tell the BBC the Queen was NOT asked about naming their daughter Lilibet by Harry and Meghan. She was merely informed.

Now who do you believe?


The act of crass commercialisation that gives the lie to Meghan and Harry's
claim that they asked the Queen's permission to name their daughter after
her


full details here:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...bets-name.html

Crass commercialisation and more H&M lies.

Dan relaying accurate information for those that are interested. :thumbs:

Marsh. 22-06-2021 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11062902)
its his job :joker:

you may as well have a go at a teacher for not also working in the coop

they have other reporters covering ALL news

he is at the top of his game writing for the biggest online newspaper in the world earning 6 figures

lol

Aww, is he a family member?

I couldn't give a fook how many figures he earns, he's a sad little man peddling lies and gossip and calling it "work".

Top of his game being part of a mob that causes grief and misery, along with the occasional suicide.

"lol"

Beso 22-06-2021 09:02 PM

Hes not that little tbf.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.