its because they are illegal and not wanted

Would you "want" a legal Middle Eastern immigrant over and above, let's say, a US citizen (we'll say one lacking melanin, for argument's sake) whose Visa has expired but they've chosen to stay anyway?

If not then it has absolutely nowt to do with legality. "Not wanted", certainly.

Yes many Asians
have now been given a Text
saying the will go to Rwanda

The migrants fleeing to Ireland shows that the Rwanda scheme might be at least somewhat effective as a deterrent, no?

what on earth are you on about TS

stop trying to be "down with the kids" and embrace reality


go buy a keffiyeh from Amazon and pitch your tent on Glasgow green ffs

:joker:

[First Flight to Rwanda
will only go if Sunak wins

Booked for the 5th of July

Ref: Politics Live BBC2HD]


Looks like it is now dead

This has to be possibly totally deceitful and nonsense from Sunak.

He couldn't have this set up now with an election where the Parties are divided on
LABOUR against it, the CONS for it.

How convenient to say it's set for the day AFTER voting.

If this was true and all was ready for it to take off.
Then he should have called the election for July 11th or 18th.
To prove this to be correct.

His probable arrogance of deceit to the voters really has no limitations for Sunak.
Surely voters will see through this completely.
Surely.

That's bloody racist and ignorant..what a clown of a statement to make.

If the same number arrived every day for the next 10 years, the new arrivals would make up less than 3% of the population of the UK.

Don't be alarmist.

Its racist to call out racism? Well that's a brand new gotcha. A real head scratcher. A paradox, even.

What's the reality LT? You do an awful lot of alluding to it and not much... Well... Actually just saying what you mean. It's a bit underfoot isn't it. A bit weasly.

Are they all brown? Or is that just sll you see...

And your maths is dreadfull as well.

That's all the person I was referring to sees (or considers to be relevant) in my opinion, based on years of experience of that person's views in posts. You'll note that he hasn't denied it, and instead told me to "embrace reality". We'll have to wait to find out what "reality" that is I suppose. I think I know. But to assume makes an ass melt of me and LT, as they say.

Also my maths isn't terrible, I used an approximation of 350 for days in a year and 700 for the number of people to do it quickly in my head, but here's the actual maths if you really want it.

710 (people) x 365 (days) = 259150

X 10 (years) = 2,591,500 people (in 10 years)

2,591,500 / 67,000,000 (population of UK currently) = 0.38

X 100 = 3.8% increase in population in 10 years.

So it's less than 4% rather than less than 3% due to rounding error. Not a meaningful difference in terms of my point. Zizu still has civil war breaking out over a 3.8% demographic shift in 10 years.

Thankyou for checking my homework though Parmy I've learned a valuable lesson about rounding & laziness.

By my calculations your figure would have the pop at 82 million...

Which to be fair is probably what it will be in ten years, once the toddler girls are married off and pregnant.. you also fail to take into account the muslim population we already have that this ten year influx of muslim immigrants will be adding to, so my calculations make it nearer 11 percent, and rising fast.

Self flatulation overload.

I found your comment racist and thick.also lazy in a way for lumping all immigrants and refugees in the brown bracket to try and prove a silly point..

You didn't understand my point Parmy or perhaps didn't even read it? I specifically pointed out that not all immigrants are non-white, and was commenting on the simple fact that LT isn't concerned with the white ones. He claims he wants the govt to crack down on immigration but in fact it's only certain immigrants he wants "cracked down on". That was my whole point.

Oh, the old I'm saying racist things, to prove my view on someone else, stance.. doesn't work on me. Sorry.