ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Big Brother 2024 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=757)
-   -   Ali attempting to apply the patriarchal pyramid to the house (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=393722)

Beso 31-10-2024 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBXX (Post 11552513)
A lesbian referred to herself and two housemates she is close to as the queer housemates. She’s never ever referred to it as the 3 Queer Alliance and it’s not up to a straight person to do so on her behalf.

Do the LGBTQ community want people to use these words, or not?

Because I'm confused!

Is it only people falling under the rainbow banner that's allowed to use them because im sorry, but you cant be telling people what words they can or cant use.

I will say however to stop you being so offended, and to stop you accusing me if casual homophobia that I will now cease from uttering that word on here again.

BBXX 31-10-2024 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beso (Post 11553198)
Do the LGBTQ community want people to use these words, or not?

Because I'm confused!

Is it only people falling under the rainbow banner that's allowed to use them because im sorry, but you cant be telling people what words they can or cant use.

I will say however to stop you being so offended, and to stop you accusing me if casual homophobia that I will now cease from uttering that word on here again.

The issue wasn't with you using the word queer, it was the context it was used in - it was you calling them the ' 3 Queer Alliance' when they themselves haven't coined that phrase. They are not in an alliance of three, you've taken it from when Ali was talking about the triangle and said that in the middle and the bottom are the "queer housemates". Totally different.

Would you group people of colour together and call them a "POC-Alliance" or what about if a few HMs who happened to be friends shared a religion? That would be equally inappropriate.

It's like when you called Henry and Jordan's relationship a "gay parade". Yes, they were both gay but would you ever refer to any straight relationship as the "straight parade".

It's completely unnecessary.

Beso 31-10-2024 11:08 AM

That's thats the difference though, The POC in the house havnt called themselves the POC group, ali and dean clearly referred to themselves as the queera at the bottom of the pyramid.. not the middle, but the bottom. They lumped Martha in with them, making it 3. I think Ali said, "that leaves us, the 3 queers at the bottom"

Then you had the conversation between the 3 of them together in Alis bed, talking about getting hanah into their group..*group = alliance*

So I rekon I'm ok calling it what I did, even as a straight person. People, or groups of people do not own words, nor can they tell others what and when they can use certain words. I wouldnt however use straight parade as a term either, because there is no parade for being straight, there are many for being gay though, which is why I linked the 2 words together on that occasion.

I think you are far to quick to point fingers at people for the words and wording they use in referring to people and situations.

bots 31-10-2024 11:08 AM

people can use terms in whatever way they want, this is a country of free speech. If something is not regarded as hate speech then it is fine. However, i do accept that laws differ between england and scotland in that regard now

BBXX 31-10-2024 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beso (Post 11553229)
That's thats the difference though, The POC in the house havnt called themselves the POC group, ali and dean clearly referred to themselves as the queera at the bottom of the pyramid.. not the middle, but the bottom. They lumped Martha in with them, making it 3. I think Ali said, "that leaves us, the 3 queers at the bottom"

It's not the same, IMO and they've never called themselves the Queer Alliance but we're going round in circles. If you want to carry on saying it, despite it not existing, then crack on.

Quote:

I wouldn't however use straight parade as a term either, because there is no parade for being straight, there are many for being gay though, which is why I linked the 2 words together on that occasion.
You were referring to their relationship in the house. Nothing to do with pride. Even if you didn't use the word Parade, saying "it's better than the gay relationship last year" sounds odd and questionable. You wouldn't say "better than the straight relationship last year". You just wouldn't.

Look, you're free to say what you want and I am free to call it how I find it. I really don't want to just keep going round in circles about this because we're not going to agree on this subject so it feels pointless.

BBXX 31-10-2024 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bots (Post 11553230)
people can use terms in whatever way they want, this is a country of free speech. If something is not regarded as hate speech then it is fine. However, i do accept that laws differ between england and scotland in that regard now

Absolutely, free speech exists. Beso is free to use certain words, I am free to say if I find the context offensive. Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequence and the consequence on this occasion is me saying sometimes what Beso say sounds a bit homophobic. :shrug:

Garfie 31-10-2024 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11551968)
I would just imagine that most people that work in Forensic Psychology would have a basic level of empathy, but maybe I'm wrong tbf as I'm not an expert on this topic.

And I do largely agree with your points, I just do wonder if on the side did Ali also feel bad for Hanah a little bit.

I don’t think you’re wrong in this suggestion at all, as I believe both things can be true at the same time, in respect that people can have more than one motive for carrying out any particular action.

On an emotional level, Ali might well have felt genuine empathy for Hanah, whilst on an intellectual level she might have recognised that Hanah could help her feel a greater sense of security in adding numbers to her group. To add to that, on a sub-conscious level, her background in psychology might have triggered her analytical thinking, and taken her comfortably into the role of counselling or calming down a person in distress.

The truth is none of us truly know what another person’s motives might be, and ironically Ali might not even be fully aware of her own motives, or she might perceive them differently to others.

In just the same way, members of the forum will perceive Ali differently, depending on their own backgrounds, knowledge and experiences. Most of what is expressed on here in terms of assessing or judging a housemate’s character, is personal opinion based on individual perception, as that’s all it can be. It’s one of the reasons I always try to clearly present my opinions as just that, rather than stating them as fact. In reality, no-one can claim they are more right than anyone else, and as long as opinions are based on justifiable evidence, everyone’s is equally valid.

Beso 31-10-2024 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBXX (Post 11553239)
Absolutely, free speech exists. Beso is free to use certain words, I am free to say if I find the context offensive. Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequence and the consequence on this occasion is me saying sometimes what Beso say sounds a bit homophobic. :shrug:

There is a difference though, my words have no direct consequences for another person, whereas your words, which is basically you saying I'm a hateful person(which is rather hateful in itself) have a direct consequence for me.

BBXX 31-10-2024 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beso (Post 11553251)
There is a difference though, my words have no direct consequences for another person, whereas your words, which is basically you saying I'm a hateful person(which is rather hateful in itself) have a direct consequence for me.

I have never said you're hateful because I do not think that. I haven't even said you're a homophobe. I have said some of the things you say come across a little homophobic.

I don't believe you intend to offend people with your words, but I do believe you may not realise how they could be perceived.

If I have made you feel like I think you're a hateful person, I apologise because I truly don't think that. I don't know you.

Garfie 31-10-2024 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beso (Post 11553229)
That's thats the difference though, The POC in the house havnt called themselves the POC group, ali and dean clearly referred to themselves as the queera at the bottom of the pyramid.. not the middle, but the bottom. They lumped Martha in with them, making it 3. I think Ali said, "that leaves us, the 3 queers at the bottom"

Then you had the conversation between the 3 of them together in Alis bed, talking about getting hanah into their group..*group = alliance*

So I rekon I'm ok calling it what I did, even as a straight person. People, or groups of people do not own words, nor can they tell others what and when they can use certain words. I wouldnt however use straight parade as a term either, because there is no parade for being straight, there are many for being gay though, which is why I linked the 2 words together on that occasion.

I think you are far to quick to point fingers at people for the words and wording they use in referring to people and situations.

I’m sorry but I have to back up BBXX here. From a neutral perspective, I think you are cleverly playing with words here to send an underlying message without overtly stating it, as you know that doing so wouldn’t be wise.

Your faux innocence, does not disguise the fact that you are fully aware of your intentions - as are many of us witnessing this interaction.

BBXX 31-10-2024 11:56 AM

Also I absolutely cannot ignore the fact that you are so outraged that I've called some of your words homophobic yet you will happily label Ali racist based on absolutely no evidence.

Beso 31-10-2024 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBXX (Post 11553253)
I have never said you're hateful because I do not think that. I haven't even said you're a homophobe. I have said some of the things you say come across a little homophobic.

I don't believe you intend to offend people with your words, but I do believe you may not realise how they could be perceived.

If I have made you feel like I think you're a hateful person, I apologise because I truly don't think that. I don't know you.



No need to apologise, and I understand you better now. I shall be more carefull in the future so we can both be happier.

Beso 31-10-2024 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garfie (Post 11553254)
I’m sorry but I have to back up BBXX here. From a neutral perspective, I think you are cleverly playing with words here to send an underlying message without overtly stating it, as you know that doing so wouldn’t be wise.

Your faux innocence, does not disguise the fact that you are fully aware of your intentions - as are many of us witnessing this interaction.

Cleverly playing with words..well that's a first for me, so you dont need to apologise, even though you are incorrect.

I've said what I said and explained why i said it, if people cant take a straight person calling people the term they want to be called, then I cant help that.:shrug:

And, who is ali to call martha queer, does she know that's how martha wants herself to be described in discussions..couldnt she have just said, you me and martha? Was she cleverly using words to get a reaction, positive reaction, from the viewer?

Garfie 31-10-2024 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beso (Post 11553251)
There is a difference though, my words have no direct consequences for another person, whereas your words, which is basically you saying I'm a hateful person(which is rather hateful in itself) have a direct consequence for me.

You’re wrong. Your words do have a direct consequence to any LGTBQ+ person in this forum who happens to be reading this thread, or other threads in which you have made similar comments. Those people will have been subject to this sort of thing repeatedly in their lives, and you do it purposely to degrade them and because you know it will have a negative effect.

In my opinion, you also choose to do it all by implication and suggestion as you are fully aware of the consequences of stating it openly.

And know this is coming from a straight person, who has seen it all too often before. Know too, that your words are having a direct consequence on me, by just witnessing them, as they are wrong.

I won’t call you a hateful person, but I will say your actions are hateful. And, I believe you already know that. I’m truly saddened to read this sort of stuff in this day and age.

Beso 31-10-2024 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garfie (Post 11553282)
You’re wrong. Your words do have a direct consequence to any LGTBQ+ person in this forum who happens to be reading this thread, or other threads in which you have made similar comments. Those people will have been subject to this sort of thing repeatedly in their lives, and you do it purposely to degrade them and because you know it will have a negative effect.

In my opinion, you also choose to do it all by implication and suggestion as you are fully aware of the consequences of stating it openly.

And know this is coming from a straight person, who has seen it all too often before. Know too, that your words are having a direct consequence on me, by just witnessing them, as they are wrong.

I won’t call you a hateful person, but I will say your actions are hateful. And, I believe you already know that. I’m truly saddened to read this sort of stuff in this day and age.



Well can you please tell me what word to use for people who identify as the Q in LGBTQ so I can use that instead.

GoldHeart 31-10-2024 12:20 PM

Can Ali just shut the hell up , can tell it annoys her that Khaled is popular on the outside world. And why is she going on about the other group " protecting themselves and not voting for anyone else", first of all ..I'm pretty sure she's hovering over nom talk ...but ok BB we'll let that one off .

But I'm sorry but isn't she also protecting her friends!??? :crazy: :conf:, she's never going to nominate Lily , Nathan or Dean . So why is she so salty at the other group being " strong" . She wants Hanah on her side , but Hanah is still friends with the boys.

For once Lily said something somewhat optimistic by saying " it will bring us all closer together", of course Ali had to burst that with her negativity...by basically saying " no " :notimpressed: .

FromBB8 31-10-2024 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 11553291)
Can Ali just shut the hell up , can tell it annoys her that Khaled is popular on the outside world. And why is she going on about the other group " protecting themselves and not voting for anyone else", first of all ..I'm pretty sure she's hovering over nom talk ...but ok BB we'll let that one off .

But I'm sorry but isn't she also protecting her friends!??? :crazy: :conf:, she's never going to nominate Lily , Nathan or Dean . So why is she so salty at the other group being " strong" . She wants Hanah on her side , but Hanah is still friends with the boys.

For once Lily said something somewhat optimistic by saying " it will bring us all closer together", of course Ali had to burst that with her negativity...by basically saying " no " :notimpressed: .

She paired Lily with Hanah simply to try and protect her. She can hardly be surprised when the other friendship group want to protect their own.

I do want to see Lily in the house without Ali. I think it'd be interesting to see who she starts to grow closer to.

GoldHeart 31-10-2024 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FromBB8 (Post 11553294)
She paired Lily with Hanah simply to try and protect her. She can hardly be surprised when the other friendship group want to protect their own.

I do want to see Lily in the house without Ali. I think it'd be interesting to see who she starts to grow closer to
.

Exactly this

Garfie 31-10-2024 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beso (Post 11553286)
Well can you please tell me what word to use for people who identify as the Q in LGBTQ so I can use that instead.

I’m not playing your game.

Beso 31-10-2024 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garfie (Post 11553322)
I’m not playing your game.

Then a man of my age will never learn I'm afraid.:shrug:

GoldHeart 31-10-2024 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garfie (Post 11553322)
I’m not playing your game.

I think it gets a little baity on here in general tbh ,and there's even a thread accusing Khaled of being
" homophobic" for no reason. So stuff like that doesn't help.

Ali herself kept saying " Queer" , she even referred to Nathan as that ... despite the fact he doesn't want a label. I got the impression " Queer" is now used as an umbrella term for not being totally straight/ hetro. But yeah there will be some who don't like that word , however it is part of the letter in LGBTQ , so not sure how those people feel about it being a part of the letter group.

I think sometimes people are just confused and to what they can say ,it isn't always coming from a malicious place. But I will say ... sometimes people lash out as a tot for tat ,and as Martha would say ' it's giving playgroup ' .

Beso 31-10-2024 01:22 PM

Just to defend myself further, my reasons for saying Ali could be racist is because she felt she had to check on hanah way back when hanah and kahled had their chat after their drama.. and also her beef with kahled from the outset...

She wasn't like that with any other man so why kahled, the young Muslim?

Admittedly I dont think that now. I think it's just men in general.

GoldHeart 31-10-2024 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beso (Post 11553373)
Just to defend myself further, my reasons for saying Ali could be racist is because she felt she had to check on hanah way back when hanah and kahled had their chat after their drama.. and also her beef with kahled from the outset...

She wasn't like that with any other man so why kahled, the young Muslim?

Admittedly I dont think that now. I think it's just men in general.



I think it was more her 'feminist' side coming out, and she thought she was protecting Hanah. It was grating though as that conversation with Khaled & Hanah had nothing to do with her .

She pre judges people, especially men in general.

Martha did a similar thing ,when again Khaled was having a private 1 to 1 with Ali ....and Martha felt the need to interrupt to ask Ali " are you ok " . When again it had nothing to do with Martha.

It reminded me

GoldHeart 31-10-2024 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beso (Post 11553373)
Just to defend myself further, my reasons for saying Ali could be racist is because she felt she had to check on hanah way back when hanah and kahled had their chat after their drama.. and also her beef with kahled from the outset...

She wasn't like that with any other man so why kahled, the young Muslim?

Admittedly I dont think that now. I think it's just men in general.


But Hanah is Muslim aswell , so was Izaaz .And Ali got on pretty well with Izaaz . Which actually makes her pyramid argument crumble.

Beso 31-10-2024 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 11553399)
But Hanah is Muslim aswell , so was Izaaz .And Ali got on pretty well with Izaaz . Which actually makes her pyramid argument crumble.


Thats why I dont believe it now..dont really believe the man thing either now because shes always rubbing Marcellos back in praise, even after her disgust at his I'll timed choice of language.

BBXX 31-10-2024 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 11553351)
I think it gets a little baity on here in general tbh ,and there's even a thread accusing Khaled of being
" homophobic" for no reason. So stuff like that doesn't help.

Ali herself kept saying " Queer" , she even referred to Nathan as that ... despite the fact he doesn't want a label. I got the impression " Queer" is now used as an umbrella term for not being totally straight/ hetro. But yeah there will be some who don't like that word , however it is part of the letter in LGBTQ , so not sure how those people feel about it being a part of the letter group.

I think sometimes people are just confused and to what they can say ,it isn't always coming from a malicious place. But I will say ... sometimes people lash out as a tot for tat ,and as Martha would say ' it's giving playgroup ' .

I just want to point out once again it's not the usage of the word, it's the context it's within.

Another example from the same user, aside from the two I have mentioned, is in the 'Soap Star arrested for having sex with underage boys' thread where he says "TV gays are a different breed". If the news article was 'Soap Star arrested for having sex with underage girls' and I said "TV straights are a different breed" it would be extremely inappropriate not to mention weird.

Another example was where he suggested Ali might fancy Khaled because "go gay, you gotta stay" like sexuality was a choice, despite the fact Ali calls herself a Lesbian.

Another example is him saying he'd rather die in war than be "bummed in jail"

Another example is saying "They like a bit of rape in these gays bars" like rape doesn't happen anywhere else.

Mentioning sexuality where it's not warranted is a tactic (yes I know I sound like Ali) that people use to draw negative attention to a particular group without actually saying anything negative.

I am sure I could go on with more examples but I won't. The attempt at looking innocent despite a back catalogue of questionable content is disingenuous to say the least. I was trying to be polite but sometimes a spade is just that.

Garfie 31-10-2024 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 11553351)
I think it gets a little baity on here in general tbh ,and there's even a thread accusing Khaled of being
" homophobic" for no reason. So stuff like that doesn't help.

Ali herself kept saying " Queer" , she even referred to Nathan as that ... despite the fact he doesn't want a label. I got the impression " Queer" is now used as an umbrella term for not being totally straight/ hetro. But yeah there will be some who don't like that word , however it is part of the letter in LGBTQ , so not sure how those people feel about it being a part of the letter group.

I think sometimes people are just confused and to what they can say ,it isn't always coming from a malicious place. But I will say ... sometimes people lash out as a tot for tat ,and as Martha would say ' it's giving playgroup ' .

Hey, I appreciate your response as I have a lot of respect for you, and this thread was truly something else in a number of interactions. I can understand that sometimes in a heated debate, people can express themselves badly or in the wrong way, and I accept that.

However, sometimes people get personal and unpleasant just for the sake of it or potentially due to some underlying beliefs. Some of the posts on this thread were not sudden and heated outbursts or the result of confusions, but much more carefully considered to achieve a certain impact and to make people feel a particular way. I’ve seen this too often- in fact, my job requires training in understanding and recognising it - and I believe I recognise it for what it is. On this occasion, I can’t be swayed from that.

I understand the terminology and the acceptable use of it, so the problem wasn’t the use of the word ‘queer’ or me having any dislike of it, but of how it was being used in a taunting and deliberate way to send a certain message. When the thin line of homophobia or any other prejudice is being skated on, I can’t stand by and watch that happen, yet say nothing about it. When people continue to do it, when someone else has clearly explained the implications and effects, they are doing so by choice, and proving it is intentional.

Beso 31-10-2024 02:04 PM

You should really post the threads all those were said in, for true context...cause the tv one was said because we have had high profile cases of gay tv stars messing up..


The bumming in jail happens, only a fool would deny that, and that was said in an argument about fighting for the uk or going to jail..


The rape in these bars comment was about a rape in a gay bar where staff stood by and let a drug dealer rape someone in manchester.

Gay you gotta stay, was uttered by me when I was saying uf Ali can go from straight relationships to lesbian relationships, then there is no reason why she couldntcrevert back to a straight relationship


I once even said 2 paedophiles could pretend to be gay in order to adopt a child to abuse from that came an accusation that us still used against me which is that I think all gays are paedos.. a slanderous accusation, much like the way this is going.

BBXX 31-10-2024 02:09 PM

None of that was a good defence, I hope you understand. I'm not engaging with you on this any further, the topic had been derailed enough.

GoldHeart 31-10-2024 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garfie (Post 11553411)
Hey, I appreciate your response as I have a lot of respect for you, and this thread was truly something else in a number of interactions. I can understand that sometimes in a heated debate, people can express themselves badly or in the wrong way, and I accept that.

However, sometimes people get personal and unpleasant just for the sake of it or potentially due to some underlying beliefs. Some of the posts on this thread were not sudden and heated outbursts or the result of confusions, but much more carefully considered to achieve a certain impact and to make people feel a particular way. I’ve seen this too often- in fact, my job requires training in understanding and recognising it - and I believe I recognise it for what it is. On this occasion, I can’t be swayed from that.

I understand the terminology and the acceptable use of it, so the problem wasn’t the use of the word ‘queer’ or me having any dislike of it, but of how it was being used in a taunting and deliberate way to send a certain message. When the thin line of homophobia or any other prejudice is being skated on, I can’t stand by and watch that happen, yet say nothing about it. When people continue to do it, when someone else has clearly explained the implications and effects, they are doing so by choice, and proving it is intentional.

I completely understand you , but there's alot of double standards . I've seen comments mocking Khaled & Segun's sexuality....as if somehow they're both secretly in the closet or something, those same people then hit the roof when Ali's sexuality is being mocked & disrespected. I wish there was consistency.

I've seen it from all sides on here. I wish people would stop the sniping and getting personal .

BBXX 31-10-2024 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 11553436)
I completely understand you , but there's alot of double standards . I've seen comments mocking Khaled & Segun's sexuality....as if somehow they're both secretly in the closet or something, those same people then hit the roof when Ali's sexuality is being mocked & disrespected. I wish there was consistency.

I've seen it from all sides on here. I wish people would stop the sniping and getting personal .

I have seen that too and spoken out - literally in the last 24 hours I told a user we shouldn't invalidate Khaled's sexuality. Others behaviour is somewhat irrelevant though, it just deflects from the topic at hand.

GoldHeart 31-10-2024 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBXX (Post 11553441)
I have seen that too and spoken out - literally in the last 24 hours I told a user we shouldn't invalidate Khaled's sexuality. Others behaviour is somewhat irrelevant though, it just deflects from the topic at hand.

Yeah I've seen that :clap1: I'm glad you've spoken out. For what it's worth I wasn't aiming it at you.

These topics do deflect big time , can get annoying.

vesavius 31-10-2024 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 11553291)
Can Ali just shut the hell up , can tell it annoys her that Khaled is popular on the outside world. And why is she going on about the other group " protecting themselves and not voting for anyone else", first of all ..I'm pretty sure she's hovering over nom talk ...but ok BB we'll let that one off .

But I'm sorry but isn't she also protecting her friends!??? :crazy: :conf:, she's never going to nominate Lily , Nathan or Dean . So why is she so salty at the other group being " strong" . She wants Hanah on her side , but Hanah is still friends with the boys.

For once Lily said something somewhat optimistic by saying " it will bring us all closer together", of course Ali had to burst that with her negativity...by basically saying " no " :notimpressed: .

The woman has zero intellectual or moral consistency. She only cares about others in there as far as she can use them to be human shields to get her to the final.

I think that she now understands that grooming Hanah over won't work and that her little play there failed.

What we saw at the end last night was the realisation that her minions are just not liked outside the house and all she can rely on to survive is them being less liked than she is.

She knows the week that she is put up against Lily she is toast.

Beso 31-10-2024 02:32 PM

Like goldheart, think the best of.

Dislike beso, think the worst of.

Its that simple fur you garfie, thats why you claim to know why I said it..


Real reason us I thought 3 queers was catchy, and seeing as ali named them the queers, and there was 3 of them, and because if the bedroom chat about influencing hanah to come to their group of 3, I used the catchphrase 3 queer alliance for them.

I also stated I wouldnt use it again because it may upset people but you've skirted past that and claimed I'm continuing to use it even after the hurt it can cause was explained.

Maru 31-10-2024 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBXX (Post 11553221)
The issue wasn't with you using the word queer, it was the context it was used in - it was you calling them the ' 3 Queer Alliance' when they themselves haven't coined that phrase. They are not in an alliance of three, you've taken it from when Ali was talking about the triangle and said that in the middle and the bottom are the "queer housemates". Totally different.

Would you group people of colour together and call them a "POC-Alliance" or what about if a few HMs who happened to be friends shared a religion? That would be equally inappropriate.

It's like when you called Henry and Jordan's relationship a "gay parade". Yes, they were both gay but would you ever refer to any straight relationship as the "straight parade".

It's completely unnecessary.

When do any of us ever have the luxury of determining when and what others call us? That's not reality. Ali got called red witch of all things. I see that as completely offensive, but it's also just as funny. Should I exorcise (no witch puns intended) the part of me that has a sense of humor. I'm sure they didn't get permission to "coin" that term. I feel like the above stance is too rigid and isn't willing to accept that there is subjectivity when it comes to the perceptions surrounding the use of words.

For example, I don't like that Ali took up the red witch term. I feel like that term whatever Marcello & co intended left a hurtful energy on her time in the house. But she enjoys using it, so what am I to say? (And costume looked awesome).

Where people others use names that they call themselves know most will think are vulgar or happen to be one of those wildcard words (Queer is one of them...) that can warrant a pro-acceptance celebration one minute and pitchforks the next. I just don't play that game. It's deceptive. I think it is ridiculous when the LGBT, or I should say not even the LGBT people themselves but the narcs who now hijacked them... they think they can a plethora of words and tell other people how to use them... **** that... and there comes a point when enough is enough and we all should stop playing the game. Beso is one of those people who don't play that shitty game and I appreciate him for that

The only meaningful context here is it's being used to comment on a highly edited TV show. This is a TV show forum so we should be able to comment on what we perceive about the house dynamics. If he sees people building an alliance based on an alliance of Queers (perfectly valid use of that term imv, but perceptions obviously vary :shrug:)... I might think that the argument could be made that isn't entirely true, that she may chuck Dean at the earlier convenience...

It is a game and I think that the seriousness aspect at which Ali is approaching the game is hurting her time in there more than helping her. She does not have to see things as groups and she shouldn't take offense at things as groups, but it is a choice to her... and a good argument to have would be about how other people also only see groups and how these terms/etc, get floated about and cause impressions because inevitably when you start seeing people as only being in certain groups, then it can easily create negative feelings/associations for those people... Beso calling them Queer for example, shouldn't have a negative connotation, but we're implying that it could and I think that's troublesome also ... hopefully that was clear, but I'm open to being wrong on any of it, tbh... (Except Beso, I like Beso :love:)

Beso 31-10-2024 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBXX (Post 11553428)
None of that was a good defence, I hope you understand. I'm not engaging with you on this any further, the topic had been derailed enough.

Coming back to post about me in a long winded attempt at a gotcha moment to another user then saying the above is nothing more than a **** house move.

GoldHeart 31-10-2024 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vesavius (Post 11553451)
The woman has zero intellectual or moral consistency. She only cares about others in there as far as she can use them to be human shields to get her to the final.

I think that she now understands that grooming Hanah over won't work and that her little play there failed.

What we saw at the end last night was the realisation that her minions are just not liked outside the house and all she can rely on to survive is them being less liked than she is.

She knows the week that she is put up against Lily she is toast.

I'm actually fed up of how Lily is clinging to her every word, they're both joint at the hip. Just think how the dynamic would change if Ali wasn't around... maybe Lily would stop thinking about nominations and the whole 'us against them ' mentality so much.

vesavius 31-10-2024 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 11553460)
I'm actually fed up of how Lily is clinging to her every word, they're both joint at the hip. Just think how the dynamic would change if Ali wasn't around... maybe Lily would stop thinking about nominations and the whole 'us against them ' mentality so much.

Imagine if you were Ali though... Knowing that your closest ally in there will also inevitably be your end but you can't even cut them loose.

GoldHeart 31-10-2024 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vesavius (Post 11553466)
Imagine if you were Ali though... Knowing that your closest ally in there will also inevitably be your end but you can't even cut them loose.

Yeah it is kind of funny , she's using Lily....but Lily will also beat her in the game .

Beso 31-10-2024 02:50 PM

Thank you @Maru the feeling has always been mutual.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.