Originally Posted by Petemitch (Post 6765251)

Originally Posted by Tom! (Post 6765254)

I can't see it

Originally Posted by Benjamin

5 points - Jordan/Loukas. I think their design of it and description was good, I feel it would work well on TiBB. The copyright thing is an issue easily fixed by using YT vids instead. Took a while to answer some questions and seemed little perplexed by some. Overall though this would be the one I would invest in for TiBB.


3 points - Just getting these is Drew, Jake and Natalie. I think it is a workable idea on TiBB, just lacking any real enthusiasm or self-input. I feel the answers to the questions were weak and that they played it far too safe. They need to learn to answer questions better too if they make the final or it will be their undoing.


1 point: Vanessa/Pothutic - I love this idea, it different, it;s funny, it just would not work on TiBB. It would be a fad that lasted a few weeks if that before succumbing to the depths of TiBB joining most of the social groups and the blogs as rarely used areas. I did like their pitch however and their question answering, but it comes down to the product, which sadly let them down.

Originally Posted by Benjamin (Post 6765266)

.

Originally Posted by Loukas (Post 6765273)

my name is Loukas
With a K and an U and an A

not Lewis with an E and an I and a W

lol

(thanks for the 5 points) :hugesmile:

Originally Posted by Petemitch

5 points - Loukas and Jordan
A clear, well structured pitch with a solid idea and interactivity. They were very good at answering posed questions and criticisms

3 points - Drew, Jake, Natalie
Another excellent idea only topped by the above. Their pitch was a bit wafflely (spelling sorry) and could have easily been broken down into different section, bullet points to attract attention and to further convey their ideas. Also the lack of input in the answering questions section disappointed me and contributed to this average scoring

1 point - Mitchell and Vanessa
A different idea, yes, but not as exciting as the two other ideas. Also, they should have been prepared not to offend people and look for reasons that all people could accept it and enjoy it and not pass it off as a 'joke'. Also, it seemed that only one person was doing to the work while the other person was reaping the benefits with contributed to their low score.