![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It’s very Doctor’y. I like it and I can’t wait for the new series.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
"I Want To Believe (in misogyny)" :shrug: I mean maybe it will seem forced and awful, or maybe it'll be a breath of fresh air... I'm not sure how anyone can claim to know until we've actually seen it! Plus, I've said before, I was convinced that I'd hate both Matt Smith and then Capaldi and I like both in the role in their own ways. Smith is still my fav doctor, though that seems to be an unpopular opinion :joker:. |
Quote:
|
I said like watching a train wreck, not that it was a train wreck.
There is a difference. There have been a number commentators out there who disagree with the casting decision, like my female friend who say it won't work and it is ruined. Those commentators have explicitly stated they will not watch it. Like watching a train wreck is an expression referring to something utterly ghastly but you can not help watching. I at least will give it a chance, is what I meant. |
Quote:
Also, having a female friend who says it's ruined doesn't mean that the sentiment isn't misogynistic... Women can misogynistic too, oddly enough. That said I don't think it is always from a place of misogyny... Different people have different interpretations of the character and there's no "right to wrong" answer there. It's fiction and everyone views a narrative differently... So for some people, the doctor being a man may well be part of their concept of his identity. That isn't "incorrect", but nor is the argument that Time Lords are biologically fluid. And of course... None of the above can be used as "evidence" that the upcoming show will be awful OR great. No one will really know what they think of it until we see it in action. |
Rumor coming out about the Xmas Special ending
Spoiler: |
Quote:
|
Why is Steven Moffat obsessed with the show's past it's so annoying.
|
Quote:
|
Spoiler: |
Quote:
Spoiler: |
Quote:
Spoiler: |
Quote:
Spoiler: |
Quote:
|
It has the 5:30pm time slot on Xmas day
|
So I've recently had a rewatch of new who and I've realised that I've given Steven Moffat such a hard time and Russell T Davies run wasn't as perfect as I remember. Like his obsession with Rose was honestly so annoying to re watch and season 2 had some awful episodes. in hindsight Moffat was pretty good like this last series was phenomenal, amy and rory were brilliant companions and the 50th anniversary was great. My only problem with him really were his grand convoluted story arcs and how the companions would always end upping 'special'....
|
also I'm opening up to the idea of the doctor being a woman, I just hope it's not a social justice stunt and it actually works with the story.
|
Quote:
IMO it's a much more interesting way of doing it than the more "linear" Eccleston / Tennant arc. |
Quote:
|
Tell that to the suffragettes
|
Quote:
|
Perched!
|
Quote:
|
It sounds weird because no one mentioned Scarlett Moffatt
|
Yas Clara
|
Well he's dead rip
|
And she's dead already
|
I already love her
|
Queen of falling
|
What a load of ****e
Excited for Jodie though |
Honestly that episode was a low-key trainwreck but that may be because my family spoke over the telly about how **** everyone else's Christmas dinners looked like so I had no idea what was going on but the last 15 minutes :flutter:
|
Omg I fell in love with her there and then.
What a load of rubbish that episode was though. Bye Moffat. |
I expected a proper trip through memory lane knowing Moffat.
The last 10 minutes was fine, the rest was boring af. |
Things I liked about this episode:
|
I quite liked it, other than the fact that there was literally no plot
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.