Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428542)

No, because you just proved my point.

Your bias, didn't see it and failed to respond to articles which show what happenned :joker:.

Both as bad as each other over the whole incident IMO, just don't understand how you can say shes attention seeking and playing the victim - She went to DR, asked BB not to show her clunge and went to bed. This morning she made up with JJ and said not to talk about it anymore. Hardly attention seeking or playing the victim.

Originally Posted by vesavius (Post 3428552)

No, she said a lot more then that in the DR. She told Corin that in bed.

You obviously didnt watch the LF and your arguing from a position of ignorance.

Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428564)

You DIDN'T SEE IT, You admitted your BIAS and you still FAIL TO RESPOND to media articles which show what ACTUALLY HAPPENNED.

Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428564)

[/B] You don't even know what she said in the DR, because they DIDNT SHOW IT. For all we know, she could have been asking for a crisp sandwich. :joker:

Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428564)

I did wath the LF. How is having a 1 on 1 convo, in bed, quietly, attention seeking or playing a victim?

Originally Posted by vesavius (Post 3428585)

:sleep:I have answered all these points already... go back and read them if you want.:sleep:

Look... I asked you to post links to the media articles you are talking about. How can I respond if you give me nothing to respond to?



Danny, if you HAD watched it, which you obviously didnt, you would have heard Shunshine herself tell Corin what she said in the DR.

Unless you are calling her a liar?



Well, seeing as it followed grandstanding for the house and running to the DR, and she knew the camera was on her, some would say some who wasnt attention seeking would have just **** about it.

Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428614)

You answered them yes, but in doing so you proved what I said was correct... go back and read them if you like :sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep:

You don't actually have anything other than your own interpretation of events and personal opinion to back up your points, making your points totally irrelivant :)

Originally Posted by vesavius (Post 3428620)

Your running out of steam Danny boy... :joker::joker:

Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428627)

Are you actually going to answer any point made against your arguement, or are you going to continue posting rubbish and avoiding the question.

Are you David Cameron?

Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428614)

You answered them yes, but in doing so you proved what I said was correct... go back and read them if you like :sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep:

You don't actually have anything other than your own interpretation of events and personal opinion to back up your points, making your points totally irrelivant :)

Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428639)

:xyxwave:

Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428614)

You answered them yes, but in doing so you proved what I said was correct... go back and read them if you like :sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep:

You don't actually have anything other than your own interpretation of events and personal opinion to back up your points, making your points totally irrelivant :)

Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428652)

:xyxwave:

Originally Posted by vesavius (Post 3428664)

lmao :joker:

Your the internet equivalent of a 5 year old standing in the middle of the floor with her fingers in her ears going 'lalalacanthearyoulalal'

Too entertaining :joker:

Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428666)

I'm waiting for you to answer the bit in bold, which you are doing a very good job of ignoring

Originally Posted by vesavius (Post 3428683)

/sigh.. you have been answered.

Reading comprehension is a valuable life skill Danny.

Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428712)

*edited to avoid purposefully stupid repetition*

You seem to be fixated on the fact she is attention seeking and playing the victim and I was just interested in seeing if you had anything to actually back it up with.

*edited to not drag the conversation off onto other HMs*

Originally Posted by vesavius (Post 3428737)

If you was that 'interested' you would be reading the entire thread again, understanding the valid points that have been made by people that actually DID watch the LF last night, and questioning them for more information with an open mind (and not your entrenched support for Shunny).

I don't think your really that 'interested' at all though tbh...

I am pretty bored with you now though, you seem to have nothing else to say, so consider this my sign off on this particular topic with you. You can have the inevitable last word :sleep:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 3428750)

You're like a dog with a bone vesavius. You seem to be on here all the day long and say the same thing over and over. You're quite confrontational, and the person who posted the definition of "keyboard warrior" seems to have the measure of you. No one needs to endlessly produce evidence to support their likes and dislikes. You certainly don't.

I'm shoving you on 'ignore' now, so feel free to have a go back in that fractured, tortured way you have of using the language... I won't see it.

Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428564)

You DIDN'T SEE IT, You admitted your BIAS and you still FAIL TO RESPOND to media articles which show what ACTUALLY HAPPENNED. You don't even know what she said in the DR, because they DIDNT SHOW IT. For all we know, she could have been asking for a crisp sandwich. :joker:

I did wath the LF. How is having a 1 on 1 convo, in bed, quietly, attention seeking or playing a victim?

Originally Posted by NeoPhoenix (Post 3427487)

Trying to be as objective as possible here, I haven't seen the LF so I'm just going by what I've heard in this thread. If it is true that JJ warned her before she threw water on him, then she deserves what she got.

Hypothetical situation: If I tell a guy I'm going to punch him in the stomach, and he warns me that if I do, he is going to kick my ass, what right in the world do I have to complain when that man makes good on his promise and beats me to a bloody pulp?

It makes no sense to me whatsoever that someone would defend SS in this situation. She did something to JJ that he obviously didn't want to happen to him. He gave it back to her in return. Why is he the bad guy in this situation? If SS didn't want to end up in the pool, she shouldn't have thrown water on JJ, simple as that.

Originally Posted by Dannyboii (Post 3428712)

But once again, you haven't offered anything concrete.

You seem to be fixated on the fact she is attention seeking and playing the victim and I was just interested in seeing if you had anything to actually back it up with.

I could quite easily say Josie is playing a game and attention seeking.. don't know why and nothing to back it up with, I just don't like her so might aswell make every single thing she does seem as bad as possible.. but I dont, because I'd rather make an opinion based on evidence (whether I like the person or not), not preconceived thoughts.

Originally Posted by Jamietwo (Post 3428788)

well said, i agree.