![]() |
It will come to a point where nobody will stick their neck out to help anyone, anyone would think Bob was advocating conscripting the unemployed and shipping them to Liberia to nurse the sick rather than asking people to buy a 1.99 single :laugh:
|
Quote:
"Let's get ready to ruuuuummmmbbbble!":hehe::hehe::hehe: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
i give up..:shrug: |
Quote:
"Nigeria is Africa’s most populous country and its newest economic powerhouse." Probably all the trillions of pounds Nigerians rake in every year from all their pathetic internet scamming. In any event, just because Nigeria has its house in order does not mean that there is not great urgency to combat this virus - such a suggestion is totally preposterous. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Because the Ebola virus is highly contagious. Because we don't yet understand everything about it Because the Ebola virus is so potentially lethal. Because our preventative policies are woefully inadequate. Because the sooner any war is won, the fewer the causalities. |
Quote:
Quote:
This is why I don't understand why people are getting so worked up about this, even if it does benefit the celebs that are taking the time out of their own lives to do it, what does that matter? as long as the main point gets across about this virus and who better to put that point across than people that are looked up to in a way. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I do believe that a lot of the time these charity things are self-serving. Especially in Bobs case tbh. However...it does raise awareness and cash for good causes, so I dont see the need to get worked up about it.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
No what is coming across is a lot of cynicism about Geldofs actions, and dragging his reputation and his relationship with his family into the argument just for the hell of it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
More money is going to be there to fight this virus thanks to the charity single. Geldolf comes across as a bit of a crusader, but the end result is that there will be more resources to fight this problem that is facing a part of the world.
What's better? Doing nothing, him behaving like most of the rest of us who don't t give a damn about ebola. Or him trying his best to help, devoting his time, energy and influence. Even if his efforts just save one person, isn't that enough to justify his actions. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's just a shallow gesture that ultimately serves the celeb's interests above all else. If Bob Geldof made an appeal that didn't present himself as Africa's sole Savior and instead highlighted the plight and the people that are actually doing something significant to prevent the spread of Ebola then I'd support it but I can't support something as self serving as this 'charity' single. |
Quote:
If this single can stir up so much controversy and move so many people to post on the subject just on this forum, then those claiming Geldorf and his single are redundant better think again, because we may or may not all have been aware of Ebola, but nobody was even talking about it until this subject came along. |
Quote:
He has nothing to promote has he? no new music, book so what is the benefit I don't see it. Even ( And I don't think for a second you are) if he was doing it for those reasons you claim it's raising funds that are badly needed in the process so who cares. As said if you don't agree with the methods, the man or the music don't buy it easy as. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.