She has past form for lying. That, combined with Danny openly admitting on his public twitter that he went to dinner with her, proves that she is lying this time.

Are you suggesting Emma doesn't ever lie to the viewers?

I have already answered it. It is in the website in my sig,

I don't know what the argument is about. Danny is friends with ricci and met most of those people through him or because of him, including the "meal" that he had with Emma. (The meal being a wrap up party with 100+ people from riccis series, previous series', production team, hosts and probably some viewers.. It lead Danny to managing to get a quick selfie in). It's a lot of nothing. Danny is just a bit of a fan girl who has one celebrity friend and an active Twitter account. The website is complete rubbish. There are very valid reasons to dislike Danny, this is not one of them.

I have lied previously in my life, does that mean everything I say in future is also a lie? No. :smug:

But you clearly put a lot of stock in Danny's twitter feed so I shall just leave you to it.

Yes, and I've already told you what I think about that. :hee:

Have I any reason to disbelieve Danny's twitter feed? Danny is a bellend but he has never shown form for lying.

Emma has. Emma looked directly on the camera on BOTS and told us that rylan only went to a soundstage next door to the house. She made out that the dissenters were all conspiracy theorists. Yet a tweet proved her a liar.

So in this instance, I believe Danny.

But good decision on quitting while behind. It is always best.:pat:

He denied calling Aisleyne ugly.

He denied shagging Bianca Lake.

He denied being fame hungry.

Just three that spring to mind.

Well at least I am offering something. You point blank refuse to even speculate on why he is being protected.

....because I don't believe he is.

Well done, you're almost computing what is actually being posted. :clap1:

But you said that lying previously in your life doesn't mean you have done it this time.:laugh:

I thought you were leaving me to it anyway?:shrug:

I can only conclude from that, that you are a danny fan.

Yes, clearly I'm a Danny fan.


:joker:

I was responding to you saying he hasn't lied with evidence that he has?

So why does that not put doubt over his claims for you like it does with Emma? :think:
Because it doesn't fit your agenda?

I don't think Emma going to dinner with him three years ago is the only feasible explanation as to why they haven't kicked Danny out of the house. Channel 5 love nastiness, just look at them keeping the likes of Conor and Helen in the house. Look at how they didn't break up the Daley and Hazel incident even though it was blatantly obvious it wasn't going to end well. Look at how practically every single task is designed with causing conflict in mind. The ratings suck, they love controversy, so why not keep him in? They were probably sat backstage praying he WOULD punch Marc in the face so they could make a super dramatic montage of it with Marcus screaming in background in the next highlights episode!!

This is spot on.

The website is just a lame excuse for hatred towards Danny and is looking far too much into things. :joker:

I hope Matt Willis leaves the wench for cavorting with Danny.

Seems like operation yewtree is doing a comeback.
Call the detectives!
https://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com...-channel-5.png
http://i1.mirror.co.uk/incoming/arti...ig-Brother.jpg

How is the website any different to the big "get Marc out campaign" thread on this forum?

Exactly...!!
:clap1:

Oh God, don't remind me of him. ( the top one)

Stop giving it the attention it desires the whole thing is just a windup to get a bite.

I think this website could actually have an effect on thug Danny's chances to win.

Not so much the connections to Emma etc but the tweets section will open a lot of eyes. This site has been posted on DS and will be doing the rounds on Twitter and moronbook.

You might have a point here.

I have said that the connections aren't the most convincing thing on the site. The tweets are.

Danny is a fame ***** and would sell his dying granny to get 5 seconds on TV

Because it's free and takes a lot less effort to post a thread on a forum, whereas it costs money to buy a domain and a lot more effort to construct a website/'gather evidence' to put on said site?