ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   The Irish abortion referendum. (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=341250)

Northern Monkey 23-05-2018 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10002376)
Is the uk law really that..my goodness..

Im shocked at that and very upset.

It is awful.Anyone who’s been to even the 12 week scans knows that your baby’s not just a collection of cells by then and at the 21 week scan they look like a fully formed little person.
It should be limited to before 12 imo.

Niamh. 23-05-2018 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey (Post 10004231)
It is awful.Anyone who’s been to even the 12 week scans knows that your baby’s not just a collection of cells by then and at the 21 week scan they look like a fully formed little person.
It should be limited to before 12 imo.

Before 12 weeks isn't enough time imo and 12 weeks gives the person enough time to first of all find out they're pregnant and secondly a little time to process that and give their decision the thought time it deserves. 12 weeks is when an embryo becomes a fetus so that's probably why there's that cut off point being proposed. Also, I've had 12 week scans and it really doesn't look like a baby at that stage, it looks like a bean

Beso 23-05-2018 04:22 PM

So a married couple find out the kid they have been trying for is now concieved....they split 11 weeks down the line...the wife can then abort without consulting her estranged hubby?

Brillopad 23-05-2018 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10004271)
So a married couple find out the kid they have been trying for is now concieved....they split 11 weeks down the line...the wife can then abort without consulting her estranged hubby?

She can consult him - but for obvious reasons she has to make the final decision.

Northern Monkey 23-05-2018 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10004247)
Before 12 weeks isn't enough time imo and 12 weeks gives the person enough time to first of all find out they're pregnant and secondly a little time to process that and give their decision the thought time it deserves. 12 weeks is when an embryo becomes a fetus so that's probably why there's that cut off point being proposed. Also, I've had 12 week scans and it really doesn't look like a baby at that stage, it looks like a bean

Well my two didn’t look like beans :laugh:
They had heads and bodies and you could see their bones.

I think later than 12 weeks for rape or medical complications should obviously be allowed.

I also know of somebody who had five abortions before deciding to keep number six.I would put a limit on the amount too so they can’t be used as contraception.

Northern Monkey 23-05-2018 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10004271)
So a married couple find out the kid they have been trying for is now concieved....they split 11 weeks down the line...the wife can then abort without consulting her estranged hubby?

Or in some cases they concieve unintentionally and the woman decides to keep it but the man says he isn’t ready to have kids then she has it and stings him for thousands of £’s over 18 years.
Or the man might want the kid but she just terminates it without considering what the father wants.

Basically he has no rights to his kid.

Cherie 23-05-2018 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey (Post 10004280)
Or in some cases they concieve unintentionally and the woman decides to keep it but the man says he isn’t ready to have kids then she has it and stings him for thousands of £’s over 18 years.
Or the man might want the kid but she just terminates it without considering what the father wants.

Basically he has no rights to his kid.

My body my choice but want your cash input, it is not a black and white issue in those cases

Cherie 23-05-2018 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey (Post 10004275)
Well my two didn’t look like beans :laugh:
They had heads and bodies and you could see their bones.

I think later than 12 weeks for rape or medical complications should obviously be allowed.

I also know of somebody who had five abortions before deciding to keep number six.I would put a limit on the amount too so they can’t be used as contraception.



Awful, when my sister was doing her nursing training and she was only in the midwifery dept for 3 months she said it was an every day occurrence

Beso 23-05-2018 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 10004274)
She can consult him - but for obvious reasons she has to make the final decision.

But she can also NOT consult him..she might be so pissed at him that she goes and murders his unborn baby to spite him.

Smithy 23-05-2018 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10004014)
Politically which was your original point Southern Ireland is not part of the British Isles, so we don't have to be in line with anything :hee:

Maybe I should have just put first world countries like I initially planned to, my mistake :hee:

Cherie 23-05-2018 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 10004308)
Maybe I should have just put first world countries like I initially planned to, my mistake :hee:

I expect Niamh is preparing the case for a lengthy ban

Tom4784 23-05-2018 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10004294)
But she can also NOT consult him..she might be so pissed at him that she goes and murders his unborn baby to spite him.

You can't rely on hyper specific hypotheticals with liberal use of overtly emotional language to make a point against abortion because that hypothetical isn't universal.

It's a woman's body at the end of the day, it's her choice.

Brillopad 23-05-2018 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10004294)
But she can also NOT consult him..she might be so pissed at him that she goes and murders his unborn baby to spite him.

I find it hard to believe a woman who had planned a baby would abort it out of spite. She would more than likely make such a decision out of panic about coping on her own.

Greg! 23-05-2018 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10004014)
Politically which was your original point Southern Ireland is not part of the British Isles, so we don't have to be in line with anything :hee:

It is part of the British Isles though nnn

kirklancaster 23-05-2018 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 10004308)
Maybe I should have just put first world countries like I initially planned to, my mistake :hee:

:joker: RUN Smithy RUN. :dog:

Cherie 23-05-2018 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg! (Post 10004342)
It is part of the British Isles though nnn

Not in my world :hee:

Beso 23-05-2018 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 10004331)
I find it hard to believe a woman who had planned a baby would abort it out of spite. She would more than likely make such a decision out of panic about coping on her own.

You believe that even after that mad cow with the acid attack.:shrug::conf:

Northern Monkey 23-05-2018 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kirklancaster (Post 10004346)
:joker: RUN Smithy RUN. :dog:

Is that the dog from the movie after he got his balls fondled by a dog lover?

Beso 23-05-2018 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 10004319)
You can't rely on hyper specific hypotheticals with liberal use of overtly emotional language to make a point against abortion because that hypothetical isn't universal.

It's a woman's body at the end of the day, it's her choice.

Ok...how about so pissed at him she hurls acid all over him as he sleeps resulting in a slow painfull death...is that more believable.:shrug:

Tom4784 23-05-2018 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10004357)
Ok...how about so pissed at him she hurls acid all over him as he sleeps resulting in a slow painfull death...is that more believable.:shrug:

Throwing another ultra specific hypothetical (one which has nothing to do with the subject at hand) does not make your original point any less flawed.

arista 23-05-2018 06:35 PM

Dublin Live Debate Ch4HD News now

AnnieK 23-05-2018 06:53 PM

I am very much Pro Choice and believe that as women we do have more rights to choose what happens to our bodies BUT I do believe that men deserve a voice in debates such as this. Contraception should definitely be both parties responsibility if they do not want sex to result in a pregnancy.

arista 23-05-2018 07:03 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TGF9jBSr3c

The debate carries on.
ch4news

Brillopad 23-05-2018 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10004351)
You believe that even after that mad cow with the acid attack.:shrug::conf:

It’s not the same - that woman is a psycho.

Tom4784 23-05-2018 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 10004452)
I am very much Pro Choice and believe that as women we do have more rights to choose what happens to our bodies BUT I do believe that men deserve a voice in debates such as this. Contraception should definitely be both parties responsibility if they do not want sex to result in a pregnancy.

I just believe that we are too far removed from the pregnancy process to try to dictate what women can do with their bodies. Men are just spectators really, we can offer support but we don't go through the risks or the trials and tribulations of it.

I think contraception is a different issue entirely. As you said it's both party's responsibility to make sure they are safe. I've always thought it was odd when you go to certain places and there'll be a condom machine in the men's room but not the women's. Anyone that's sexually active, regardless of gender should have condoms tbh.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.