ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums
Page 6 of 6 « First 45 6
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Jacob Rees-Mogg issues style guide to staff! (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=359610)

Kate! 28-07-2019 05:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 10642340)
Reading through this thread what an eye opener... a better social class...Did I read that right?
What a joke.
This filibuster is a parody, a walking joke. His latest foray as an author is testament to that!
How dare he attempt to instruct others how to form a sentence :/ This great advocate of free speech putting blocking staff from expressing themselves?

There are many with an established British heritage that don't conduct themselves in such an affected manner, his father was a journalist... Let's digest that for a second.
Even if his family had been gifted land by some murderous syphilis ridden king, it is baffling to me how that springboards the status of their modern day decendants...

In the modern era it's not how round your vowels are, your antique taste in suits or the ridiculous sounding names of your children that denotes 'class'.
Kizzy :worship:

Elliot 28-07-2019 05:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 10642078)
the point is that in a tolerant world, people are allowed different opinions to your own. That doesnt make them scum or any other adjective thrown about this forum on a regular basis. What disappoints me greatly is that these same people expect others to be tolerant of them and their own views
Freedom of opinion is a two way street. You can think what the **** you want, but people can think what the **** they want about your abhorrent opinion. Homophobia itself is intolerance of an entire community, so I think people are allowed to be a little aggrieved with how they put themselves across when discussing this if ugly bigoted homophobes are allowed to yell their bile from the rooftops. An ugly look you trying to use ‘tolerance’ to protect homophobes

Kazanne 28-07-2019 05:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10642344)
Are you criticising him? You must be very jealous. That's the only reason one can be critical.
Not criticising just being factual as he comes across to me

Marsh. 28-07-2019 05:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 10642347)
Not criticising just being factual as he comes across to me
As are the people commenting on Rees-Mogg.

Or is his social class so high he's untouchable?

Elliot 28-07-2019 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10642136)
Bots :clap1: tolerance is a two way street
So is free speech, so can these moronic right wingers stop using ‘freedom of opinion!!’ as a defence from people ever criticising them at all? Words come with consequences, don’t say and think bile if you’re not ready to bear responsibility for it!

Cherie 28-07-2019 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10642256)
Accepting homophobia is "tolerance"?

JFC. Give me strength. :facepalm:
accepting other people follow a religion which preclude them from accepting same sex marriage, there are alot of religions that follow this doctrine

Kazanne 28-07-2019 06:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10642348)
As are the people commenting on Rees-Mogg.

Or is his social class so high he's untouchable?
Of course he isnt untouchable,but diss him on his actions as an MP not his dress, speech ,etc. some people like him others dont, but it does come across as anyone who has money and has worked hard are shouted down a lot on here.

Marsh. 28-07-2019 06:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10642351)
accepting other people follow a religion which preclude them from accepting same sex marriage, there are alot of religions that follow this doctrine
If he was an ordinary person following the religion of his choice in the privacy of his own life.

When he brings those views into his job that very much concerns the public, it's open to be commented on and critiqued as people see fit.

Obviously.

Kazanne 28-07-2019 06:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliot (Post 10642350)
So is free speech, so can these moronic right wingers stop using ‘freedom of opinion!!’ as a defence from people ever criticising them at all? Words come with consequences, don’t say and think bile if you’re not ready to bear responsibility for it!
Well actually NO,we dont have free speech do we, we have to be careful what we say

Cherie 28-07-2019 06:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10642360)
If he was an ordinary person following the religion of his choice in the privacy of his own life.

When he brings those views into his job that very much concerns the public, it's open to be commented on and critiqued as people see fit.

Obviously.
well obviously, lets hope the same scrutiny is applied to all people who hold high office whatever their religion

Marsh. 28-07-2019 06:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10642363)
well obviously, lets hope the same scrutiny is applied to all people who hold high office whatever their religion
Oh dear, do we have to submit an essay to you with a critique of every politician in the country to qualify to post valid opinions in this thread about Jacob Rees-Mogg?

Bit much Cherie.

Cherie 28-07-2019 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10642364)
Oh dear, do we have to submit an essay to you with a critique of every politician in the country to qualify to post valid opinions in this thread about Jacob Rees-Mogg?

Bit much Cherie.
oh sorry for asking that the same scrutiny be applied to all MPs, not just the ones you want scrutinised

Marsh. 28-07-2019 06:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10642365)
oh sorry for asking that the same scrutiny be applied to all MPs, not just the ones you want scrutinised
Well, where in the thread did anyone suggest only some should be scrutinised?

The thread is about Jacob Rees-Mogg.

Cherie 28-07-2019 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10642368)
Well, where in the thread did anyone suggest only some should be scrutinised?

The thread is about Jacob Rees-Mogg.
can I not take the thread in a new direction?

you seem very keen to tell me what I can and can't post these days

Marsh. 28-07-2019 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10642371)
can I not take the thread in a new direction?

you seem very keen to tell me what I can and can't post these days
Again, no one's suggested you can't post anything.

A new direction of what? "I hope these people criticising Rees-Mogg know that he isn't the only politician in the country and they have to criticise them too!". Bit odd.

Kate! 28-07-2019 06:18 PM
Yes its true that all should come under scrutiny equally. However some openly invite such scrutiny by their words and actions. Whereas some are more discreet hmm. Mr Mogg is one of the former as he foolishly bleats his horrible beliefs at any opportunity.

bots 28-07-2019 06:33 PM
Tony Blair had strong religious views, May had strong religious views, Harriet Harman had strong religious views, loads of MP's have strong religious views. Every MP has strong views, it's a prerequisite for the job. That's why they are MP's. The are elected members of parliament, chosen by the people they represent. One doesn't have to agree with every MP or insist that they all have the same views as ourselves. That's democracy. That's tolerance. That's free speech

chuff me dizzy 28-07-2019 06:34 PM
As rightly said HIS BELIEFS and who's got the right to tell him HIS beliefs are wrong and theirs are right ? He and everyone else have a right to believe what is right and wrong

Kizzy 28-07-2019 06:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 10642398)
Tony Blair had strong religious views, May had strong religious views, Harriet Harman had strong religious views, loads of MP's have strong religious views. Every MP has strong views, it's a prerequisite for the job. That's why they are MP's. The are elected members of parliament, chosen by the people they represent. One doesn't have to agree with every MP or insist that they all have the same views as ourselves. That's democracy. That's tolerance. That's free speech
Prerequisite. . Really?
If we looked at all those mps voting records would they mirror moggs on women's issues? Specifically in relation to his catholicism?

Marsh. 28-07-2019 06:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 10642400)
As rightly said HIS BELIEFS and who's got the right to tell him HIS beliefs are wrong and theirs are right ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 10642400)
He and everyone else have a right to believe what is right and wrong
Contradicting yourself here Chuff.

Either people have the right to believe in what they think is right and wrong. And have the FREE SPEECH RIGHT TO AIR IT... or they don't.

You seem to be against it when it comes to views YOU don't agree with and it's creating irrational posts like this one.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07 AM.
Page 6 of 6 « First 45 6
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.