Do you actually think lt, cares what you or anyone else thinks.

News flash he don’t just like anyone else who lives in the real world.

Welcome to my world.

Are you his spokesman?

Real world :laugh: is that your best argument if you disagree with someone?
You do realize this is a discussion forum :hehe:

I know exactly what it is, back after your melt down are we?.

Yes I can speak for lt, and say he does not care what dizzy thinks.

Dezzy posting like lt has to answer to him in order for lt’s Opinion to be validated.

What meltdown? :laugh: what fantasy land you're living in?

Ans LT is the first one to demand links and proofs. It's only natural the same is expected of him.

That's not a response.

LT asked for something from Slim, Slim answered and LT refused to acknowledge it because he knew he couldn't refute it, instead he went in on Slim to try to distract from the fact he didn't have an answer to the links that Slim provided.

This is a debate thread, you can't just ignore responses you don't want to answer because you don't have a response so I'm not gonna let LT get away with trying to distract everyone from the fact he chose not to answer. He can choose not to answer but that will undermine his opinion going forward. I respond to all points made to me in a debate whether it puts me at a disadvantage or not because that's how debates work.

Why are you even posting here when you only screech at people that nothing matters? That is a nothing response that doesn't add anything to the discussion, you only seek to destroy the discussion at hand and if you aren't interested in taking part in the discussion then don't. Especially if all you have to add is hypocritical defenses of your friends who are guilty of the things you accuse me and others of doing.

I can post in any thread I want and I can say anything I want.

Debates, as if you respect lt’s opinion!.

You are the one that keeps throwing the word morals around and how I have none but you have the full set.

You think you can pull lt, up for another member and not get pulled up yourself.

I think it’s you that’s being hypocritical.

...that’s interesting actually, Girth...I hadn’t realised how an impeachment could boost the poll popularity...why is that, then...?...but ouch at his barely moving as well...

You might aswell go into Tesco and have a debate with a frozen chicken because by the time this thread is posted to death hundreds of more kids have dyed from starvation while people’s bins are full of wasted food.

Humans killing other humans by doing nothing.

Bad news when the evangelical base starts writing stuff like this.

Sir, this is burger king. May I take your order?

You can say what you want and I can say what I want in response, you think freedom of speech is a one way street. That you and your friends can say what you want but responses you don't like are unfair attacks on your character and it's complete snowflake bull****.

You lack morals if you defend a criminal and hope that they don't face consequences for their crimes. A lot of people defending Trump in this thread will often try and take the moral highground in other issues and so their views here are nothing more than hypocritical. These same people would want a Democrat president to be impeached on less evidence yet are screaming for Trump to be acquited on a **** ton of evidence that they don't want to acknowledge.

I'm all about accountability but your accusations are nothing more than trumped up bull**** and your hypocrisy in refusing to acknowledge your buddies' wrongdoing will forever make those accusations more ridiculous then they already are.

You'll never be able to come for me while you're being so godamn hypocritical.

I think it's only the more reasonable ones that will turn against him now. I'm pretty sure Jesus could rise from the dead and tell the Evangelicals that they are wrong to support Trump and they would denounce him given that they consider Trump to be their saviour which is really ****ing weird given that he is the furthest thing from embodying Jesus' values.

Pelosi
is not sending it to the Senate?

Jeff Van Drew was a Democrat
has now Joined the Republicans

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/12...6793714881.jpg
Yesterday
Jeff meeting the President.

[Van Drew was one of only two Democrats
to vote against the two articles of impeachment against Trump
in the full House vote Wednesday night]

Coming for you, sit down.

Hand on hips, wavey finger "don't you come at me" gif

Mature responses and exactly what I'd expect from you both.

I don't blame Pelosi for not sending it off to the Senate, it's a kangeroo court when you've got Mitch McConnell who proudly takes pictures of all the bills he's killed out of spite for Democrats and has openly admitted that he'll collude with Trump to ensure an acquital at the Senate. The republicans are corruipt as **** and the right wing are morally bankrupt for supporting the whole ****show and not deciding on the facts that tell a very clear truth. Trump used the threat of withholding aid money to get another country to investigate a political rival, it's ****ing treasonous.

Trump picking up the Democrats' castoffs and calling it a victory, sad.

It happens every time, people feel sorry for the President or think he's being picked on by the other side. A bump in popularity was expected and it was one of the things Pelosi knew would happen and thus why she was never keen on impeachment.

So the whole thing really was a waste of time and taxpayer money...

Its not over so how do you come to that conclusion?

Sit back down.

Grow up.

Well said.

Shame what happened to Republicans. They used to be a great party.
Now reduced to being trump's bitch