well the focus in a thread about them is on them

people can analyse more than one subject, we have threads on governments and elections too


:spin:

:joker::joker::joker:

Its being reported everywhere today that they have repaid the loan and Charles is no longer funding them. Hopefully, that will help pave the way for people to stop being quite so critical of their every move.

Except you never reference any of the things you list.

Daily Mail is the limit of your research.

When you purposely misunderstand what's actually been said I can see how you come to that conclusion.

It certainly explains your opinion on H&M also being full of make believe to justify whatever it is you're saying.

People will always find other reasons to justify their hatred

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex pay back Sovereign Grant money, as they seek to remove 'public interest' in their new lives

-----------------------------------------

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's £112m Netflix deal 'could include a documentary on Princess Diana

-----------------------------------------

:laugh2:

Why are they any different to anyone else in the public eye though? Being critical of public figures is a perfectly natural human trait. We form judgements on what we see/read. They are certainly not being singled out, like some people would have you believe.

That's fine. But making out someone's invented perception of a person's life behind closed doors is factual based on articles in the Daily Mail is laughable. That is the type of thing I am referring to.

The people who talk about "Poor Harry" who doesn't realise Meghan doesn't love him and makes no decisions of his own. An observation anybody who doesn't know them personally could not possibly make.

Are people saying that though? I mean they look as in love as any other celeb couple in the press. Harry is used to a highly privileged way of living, it's not like he's using these private jets and so on because of her, he'd always use them. Im against them because of their blatant hypocrisy. I have no actual hatred for them i just simply don't really like them from what i've seen/read.

Yep. It's been said several times. Everytime a thread on them is made we get the "poor manipulated Harry" routine.

But it's not like women wouldn't be queuing up for him, he's a wealthy Prince, he'll never be stuck for takers. I think they're both as bad as each other. However, i don't buy the 'poor harry' argument.

No. Me neither.

Is that the royal we?

:joker:

Meghan and Harry’s Netflix plans brutally dismissed in poll ‘sooner watch paint dry!'
BRITONS have no interest in tuning in to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's new Netflix TV shows, according recent polling.
By EMILY FERGUSON

The survey, carried out from 1pm-10pm on September 3 on Express.co.uk, asked: “Will you watch Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s new Netflix shows?”

The vast majority of respondents, 95 percent (8,229 people) voted “no”, with just five percent (318 people) saying “yes”.

Less than one percent of the 8,649 respondents, 102 people, opted for “don’t know”.

The findings of the poll were also backed by a YouGov poll, which found a similar result.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal...cumentary-poll
.................................................. ...........

Oops....:hee:

Omg :joker:

:hehe:

Royal POLL: Should the Queen remove Meghan and Harry’s royal titles over Netflix deal?

MEGHAN Markle and Prince Harry made a bombshell announcement this week they had signed a multi-year deal with Netflix to make a range of programmes for the streaming giant, which has sparked renewed calls for the couple to stop using their Duke and Duchess titles while pursuing commercial ventures. Should the Queen remove Meghan and Harry's royal titles over Netflix deal? Vote in Express.co.uk's poll.
By RACHEL RUSSELL

Our exclusive poll found a staggering 96 percent (9,335 people) thought the couple should be stripped of their Duke and Duchess titles as a result of their newly-signed agreement with the streaming giant.

Just four percent (408 people) thought Meghan and Harry deserved to keep their titles even though they were pursuing commercial ventures while 76 people said they didn't know.

A total of 9,819 readers took part in the online survey which ran between 3pm and 9pm on Saturday.

Receipts please....

Kings and queens of making the beckhams look normal.

They were under big pressure to repay it....


Confirmation of the £2.4m payment comes after significant pressure following news of their Netflix deal.


Speaking this weekend, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, deputy chair of parliament's public accounts committee, told the Telegraph: "Clearly anyone who has borrowed taxpayers' cash needs to pay it back as quickly as possible. £2.4million is a lot and even if you paid back £250,000 a year it would still take a decade."

Bim Afolami, a former member of the committee, which scrutinises public spending, agreed, saying: "If the Royal family wants to subsidise Harry and Meghan that's fine but the state should not pay for that. They need to pay the money back now."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-fa...gmore-cottage/

It was paid into the sovereign grant.

The Prince and Princess will don't deserve, literally :joker: