Ignoring them is valid, to be fair - any globalist busybodies should be ignored.

Ignoring them is valid, to be fair - any globalist busybodies should be ignored.

Globalist :laugh:

DT letter today
 

SIR – The Government’s effort to deport illegal immigrants to Rwanda
has turned into a farce, sabotaged by a small yet vociferous minority and
aided and abetted by liberal lawyers (report, June 15).

For many years it has seemed almost impossible to deport anyone from
Britain, no matter what their crime or how invalid their claim to remain. The
doctrine of human rights seems to trump all other arguments.

To enter any country without proper documentation or without going through
a recognised point of access is illegal. Britain, a sovereign state, has the
undeniable right to decide who is allowed to live here, and its government
has the executive powers to act on this.

Britain has a long history of accepting genuine refugees and needs no
lectures on its responsibilities, international or otherwise. Most voters are fed
up with seeing their wishes thwarted by Left-wing activists.

Mick Richards
Worcester

Well if Mick from Worcester finks it… that’s good enough for me.

obviously, i don't want the government to do anything illegal, but i do want illegal economic migrants excluded from the country. All the stupid justifications that they are in danger etc is complete nonsense given they arrived from france

What does that have to do with sending them to Rwanda, though… unless they came from Rwanda.

Well, continentalist then :joker:

These far-lefties are very racist towards Rwanda. They treat it like Hell on Earth.

if it's not illegal to send them to Rwanda, there is no reason why that can't be their destination

Yes get these updated Bill of Rights
through, fast

Well, under international law, asylum seekers are allowed to claim asylum in whichever country they wish, sending them to a country they've never been to or wished to be granted asylum in, sort of ignores the international law that currently exists. In fact, I'd go further and say that what the Tories are doing now will lead to numerous new international agreements to protect folks against governments like ours.

Still meaningless, regurgitated, nonsense, whichever way you want to spin it :laugh:

Shouldn't be a thing.

Why?

International law sounds globalist.

Until there's (openly) a worldwide government, there shouldn't be intentional laws.

Sure Slim.

That's why the Conservatives will alter
that old rule for the UK.


OK
will can reset it all.

Feel The Force

Very True.



Slim is Stuck in the Past.

people act like breaking international law is not a daily event across the globe

Devon today:

Today 12 illegal migrants were said to have landed from a small boat where they were met by two large people carriers with blacked out windows and whisked away.

https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon...locals-7211287



I expect the windows were blacked out as they were fleeing war-torn France and did not want to be spotted by the Lufwaffe?


YOu could not make this stuff up.