i think she should get benefits if she agrees to get sterilized.

I read that her womb is near collapsed and doctors have told her she cant procreate any more, thankfully.

or maybe it's so stretched out that now she can carry even more babies?

its because it would have to be classed as a fixture and fitting which could make the council responsible, if and when it needs replacing.

Why they don't just get the new tenant to sign a disclaimer is crazy though.

Except I'm saying to you that it was. :unsure:

Are you totally sure about this? Because I'm pretty sure they don't provide carpets / etc. Are you sure it wasn't fitted by the previous occupants and simply left by the council?

The only other explanation I can think of, is that you'll find some sort of hideous safety hazard under that laminate if you ever lift it :joker:

Maybe some councils will pay for it to be done?

£500 is not enough tbf

It may be housing association, they might.

How did we get to talking about cheap laminate flooring?

Ah yes, it was Johnny who suggested she had expensive wooden floors!!

Yes all of a sudden council tenants get wooden floors fitted gratis, and chandeliers... and altars to Mr Cameron :laugh:

No, the entire house was gutted after the previous occupants who lived worse than animals. :omgno:

one of The Truth's tenants?

David Cameron. The place was absolutely drenched in pig blood and human semen.

Because people that whine about people on benefits would like to see them living on food stamps without any quality of life. It's an attitude I've seen from both sides of the coin.

People on benefits are just an easy target for the armchair warriors to spew their bile over and engage in their malice without feeling guilty about it.

Spewing and malice, two words that could be attributed to your post :umm2:

Really? Are you sure you know what Malice means?

I've shown no malice in that post and I've certainly not spewing anything. It's probably not the best idea to accuse someone of something when you don't know what it means.

I know exactly what it means you use passive aggressive rhetoric in many of your posts, aimed at members whose views you don't agree with.

Oh Sweetheart, in the space of two posts you've called me malicious, passive aggressive and incapable of accepting other people's opinions....all because you cannot accept MY opinion. I'm not attacking you. You are the aggressor here, dear.

You've offered no counter to the post you originally quoted and instead you've attempted to (poorly) drag my character.

And here, in one post, we have some of the greatest problems on TIBB - Misinterpretation and Sweeping Statements, and Unwarranted Insult.

Without exception, those of us on here who have made unfavourable comments about this particular 'claimant' are criticising HER and HER alone -and NOT all 'people on benefits'.

There is an extensive, ready checkable history in the media, of this woman's lifestyle and life choices - thanks to her penchant for self-promotion and her desire to be in the 'limelight' - and it stamps her as a cynical, selfish, and very astute manipulator, and benefits system abuser.

She is someone who not only deserves the adverse criticism which some of us direct at her, but also someone who DESIRES it, because - as with the Leeds 'model' Josie Cunningham, who abused the benefits system for tens of thousands of pounds in breast enlargement and other cosmetic surgical ehancement procedures on the N.H.S and contacted the media to 'boast' about it all - this arrogant selfish bitch KNOWS that with the resultant and inevitable backlash, comes the 'notoriety' which all but guarantees 'celebrity' and fame.

The fact that both she and Cunningham have 'AGENTS' is irrefutable testament to the above.

The Benefits system and NHS, was never designed to be exploited in such a way, and with each case of much needed funds being 'misappropriated' in such a manner, then the undeniable reality is, that GENUINE people in REAL need are being deprived of the level of help which could alleviate THEIR suffering.

NO ONE on this thread has 'spewed' any 'bile' about 'people on benefits' - only about this particular selfish benefits abuser, and in the greatest IRONY, it is not US who are criticising her who 'would like to see' people on benefits 'living on food stamps without any quality of life' but people like YOU who are more likely to bring about such a scenario, when you are too blinded by your own personal issues that you cannot differentiate between benefit abusers and genuine claimants, and while ever you continue to defend the indefensible as a result.

Far from 'people on benefits' being an easy target for armchair warriors to spew their bile over and engage in their malice without feeling guilty about it.' it appears to me, that it is those of us who have the nerve to speak out about benefit scroungers who are the victims of billious attack by malicious 'armchair warriors' - purely because we speak the truth about scroungers and recognise that they DO indeed exist.

I could NOT agree more Cherie.

Great post Kirk :clap2:

:clap1:

:thumbs:

Why do individuals like this woman, Josie and Dee have agents? Because they fit the image that is pushed to perpetuate the stereotype claimant.
Why else?