Withano |
07-01-2018 03:00 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaxie
(Post 9776411)
Let me explain. A woman has two x chromosones and a male an x and y. Your dna is like the lego of you and so someone with xx lego will most likely have female characteristics in regard to size, shape, structure. Someone with an xy will be constructed with male characteristics. While you can have a short man and a tall woman, their physical structure is still going to be different. I believe they have discovered that being gay or straight is also in the genes.
What you are demanding of people in this thread is exactly the same as demanding that a gay man must date butch women because they look more manly.
And you are evading my question when Livia gave you the curtesy of her time and answering your interrogation.
|
I dont know what gay men and butch women have to do with the points I've discussed so far.. i dont think youre actually reading what I'm saying at all. If those are the parallels you think I'm drawing, you cant have.
We were discussing an obviously attractive male, and at what point they become an unattractive transmale. Learning their chromosomes does not really make logical sense to me, but I clarified that they were entitled to that answer. But it would suggest that their issue with dating trans is more internal. The physical body structure that come along with chromosomes were irrelevant in the discussion, but a masculine body structure would obviously be a plausible reason to find some transmen unattractive, in the same way that big hands or feet is a plausible reason for not wanting to date some transwomen (not that it is relevant to this specific scenario though, he had an incredibly masculine body structure). I'm not demanding anything from anyone, just discussing the points that they, themselves brought up.
|