indeed as that will be part of the uniform

What are you going to do with the ear lobes that you remove?

burn them and offer them as a sacrifice to the Great Trumpet God

Can see that falling on death ears.

Well exactly, I don't see why it's a huge leap for the religions that have it as a tradition to make it that it's something that people can choose to do at 18, when they are adults capable of making that choice. Not least because they may well have decided by that point that they're non-religious...

Also, in terms of the procedure itself, the foreskin is actually attached to the glans at birth and removal at that point is far more "dramatic" a procedure... and it being done to infants is actually what causes a lot of the problems that some experience (scarring / loss of sensation) because it has to be forcibly "peeled away" from the head of the penis. It doesn't start to detach until about age 3... most are fully detached by ages 5 or 6 but for some it doesn't even start to detach until puberty. It should DEFINITELY have detached by 18 - meaning that foreskin removal at age 18 would have far fewer risks, as well as the consent issue. It just makes sense :shrug:.

...(..what I’ve been googling a bit this morning../..researching..:laugh:..)...is whether adult Jewish males feel their parents had../..have a right to circumcise ...because that for me would be the thing also to think about...anyways, this is quite interesting because Jeff Goldblum, although obviously agreeing with circumcision...he also totally agrees with the other guy when he said..’my son was born perfect, why would I change/alter him in any way’...

I don't even have a willy and reading that made me cross my legs :worry:

Its bad enough catching the skin in your fly

https://im-01.gifer.com/F9U.gif

..I have to say though, in reading up some this morning...it seems something that isn’t always practised faith/religion...there are alternative ‘non cut’ practises which many seem to opt for and are unquestioningly accepted by the more ‘traditionals’ as well...

..I have a Willy, he’s fairly spectacular and amazing..:lovedup:...

Yeah, the forcible removal thing I can only imagine would be very painful. Even when there is a medical reason for removal it's rarely done before about age 5 for this very reason. It's also apparently become featured in prenatal educational stuff for all parents in the US, that it's not supposed to retract on newborns / infants, because it was so common for all kids to be circumsised for several decades but now is closer to 50/50 but the "understanding" of it hasn't caught up yet... so (gulp) there were numerous cases of parents trying to retract or even forcibly retracting the foreskin because they thought they had to get in there to clean :umm2: :bawling:. But you can seriously do some real damage doing that.

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....4,203,200_.jpg

A'body's Willy...

:worry: poor babies

I've heard that "cosmetic excess skin removal" is becoming more popular lately. Which is basically the "dangly bit" of excess foreskin (the "anteater", if you will...) being removed but leaving enough to "neatly" cover the head.

The anteater :laugh: are people really that bothered?

... ... ... ...... you're probably going to have to remove this :joker:.

she can snap mine anytime

The penis' are blurred out so I think it's ok? :laugh: but seriously wtaf? :laugh2:

I expect she alters the images using Photocock?

The bit where the guy says he volunteered because it's "nice to feel desireable" then it cuts to a penis dressed up like a little gameshow host... :laugh2:

:omgno:

I didn't know it was ever legal there. I thought it was all prawn rings, frozen chips and ice cream.

Not Stacey Caprimint's "what have you eaten in the last hour" list being exposed


:shocked:

:laugh2:

That couldn't be what I ate last, prawns aren't kosher :hmph:

See the way I'm skillfully body-swerving the circumcision debate?