:joker:

Agree I think the UK as a whole has an unhealthy obsession with sex

fixed

:hee:

:hee:

Bi and pan are still by definition different

One is sexual attraction to gender/sex, the other is not. An asexual or demisexual may date both genders, that wouldn’t make them bi though.

Bisexuality is categorised by the sexual attraction to two genders, and that is something that pansexual people dont experience.

I don’t see why this ‘they’re just bi’ thing has lasted so long. They dont experience sexual attraction in the same way as a bi person.

The question was supposed to be ‘is it real’ and i think yes.. i genuinely think people can be sexually attracted to literally anything. Probably somebody out there right now wanking over the shape of a table leg, or a herd of zebras. It isn't really implausible that some are just sexually attracted to personality, and that it is relatively common. Seems a bit obvious that it would be a sexuality actually when you consider all the weird **** that the depths of the internet goes to.

...sapiosexuality will probably send tibb into an oblivion!

All these modern labels are nonsense.

There’s something seriously wrong if most of the population isn’t inclined to reproduction. Straight and gay (including bisexual). I honestly think the binary sexual approach is the way to go.

Sexual feelings towards animals and flipping table chairs are a misdirection of the will. However PC we get there’s certain transformations of sexual impulses that aren’t normal and should never be classed as normal.

who gave you this info? Why have you linked alternative sexualities to ‘not wanting children’? do you believe all heterosexuals want to reproduce.

Very odd.

It’s not very odd, it’s a biological truth. Don’t mix up modern views on homosexuality with biology.

At the end of the day reproduction’s what continues any animal species and that’s a day 1 truth no mattter how accepting we get of alternative sexualities. I’m not even arsed about offending anyone, sometimes you’ve just got to say it how it is. What would we do if everyone was gay, hm?

I couldn’t have less of a problem with gays but heterosexuality’s the standard and so it should be even if it is for purely practical reasons like the continuation of our race. No amount of political correctness or alternative labelling for different sexual minorities can change that.

Save the planet probably :laugh:

I think there may be fewer problems if people ceased forcing their sexual preferences on other people*. I, and I'm sure the vast majority of people, don't care what others do, who they love, who they sleep with, and I in turn expect other people not to take interest in my own sex life. Love who you love... and bollox to anyone who doesn't approve.

I was going to say "stop forcing it down other people's throats" but edited myself for the sake of decency. You're welcome.

Anyone being reasonable can see my point.

Heterosexuality-reproduction continues the human race and anything more than a binary sexual distinction (hetero-and-homosexual) seems less a biological truth than unnecessary labelling. I don’t expect Withano to see the obvious when he’s blinded by this pansexuality of a thing but there’s nothing mad about what I said up there.

:fan:

But yes, in a nutshell really

I agree really, I’d imagine that gets trickier for those who have a sexuality which people believe to be fake though?

Otherwise the dialogue would be
‘I think your sexuality is fake’
‘Well I cant respond, dont wanna force it on ya’
Thats a bad dayfor everybody

Im just confused why you think only heteros reproduce, and that all heteros want to reproduce.

It does seem like that is what you’re suggesting, which is why I found it humorous.

Pan people will still reproduce, if they want to... just like heteros..

https://www.caprishop.fr/images/fryingpan_penis_big.jpg



:oh: FILTH

My type of pan :flutter:

But there are two genders. At the end of the day we're just animals, a bundle of cells propelled by biology. If find someone hot, you wouldn't be less attracted to them if they thought they were agender/greygender/whatever - you might think they're weird, but it wouldn't affect their looks.

I dont see the relevance. There are two genders that bi people are sexually attracted to, pan people do not experience that.

"Pan" people are also attracted to both genders. But apparently the fact they care about personalities means they need a whole new label.

Careful. You’re running the risk of getting called filth by some people on this thread for daring to point that out

Do you think sexual attraction is the same as attraction?

Tell him

Depends. There have been people whose personalities I've been drawn to, but only in a "it'd be cool to be his/her friend" kind of way, and also people I've not found physically/sexually attractive, but would date due to their personalities. And guess what - both these things are experienced by almost everyone! I'm bi (though these days I may as well be #FullyFag) but according to some of the descriptions bandied around here, it could make me "pan".

Honestly if you don't understand it it becomes more of a case of just accepting it and moving on. This isn't a case of 'modern PC gone mad', 'pansexuality' has been around since at least the 1900s.
There are plenty of animals exhibiting homosexual behaviour too. And bisexuals/the godforbidden pansexuals are more than capable of reproducing -shocker-



SHUT IT!

But yes drag me Cherie :clap1:

.