![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:hee: |
Quote:
|
Bi and pan are still by definition different
One is sexual attraction to gender/sex, the other is not. An asexual or demisexual may date both genders, that wouldn’t make them bi though. Bisexuality is categorised by the sexual attraction to two genders, and that is something that pansexual people dont experience. I don’t see why this ‘they’re just bi’ thing has lasted so long. They dont experience sexual attraction in the same way as a bi person. The question was supposed to be ‘is it real’ and i think yes.. i genuinely think people can be sexually attracted to literally anything. Probably somebody out there right now wanking over the shape of a table leg, or a herd of zebras. It isn't really implausible that some are just sexually attracted to personality, and that it is relatively common. Seems a bit obvious that it would be a sexuality actually when you consider all the weird **** that the depths of the internet goes to. ...sapiosexuality will probably send tibb into an oblivion! |
All these modern labels are nonsense.
There’s something seriously wrong if most of the population isn’t inclined to reproduction. Straight and gay (including bisexual). I honestly think the binary sexual approach is the way to go. Sexual feelings towards animals and flipping table chairs are a misdirection of the will. However PC we get there’s certain transformations of sexual impulses that aren’t normal and should never be classed as normal. |
Quote:
Very odd. |
Quote:
At the end of the day reproduction’s what continues any animal species and that’s a day 1 truth no mattter how accepting we get of alternative sexualities. I’m not even arsed about offending anyone, sometimes you’ve just got to say it how it is. What would we do if everyone was gay, hm? I couldn’t have less of a problem with gays but heterosexuality’s the standard and so it should be even if it is for purely practical reasons like the continuation of our race. No amount of political correctness or alternative labelling for different sexual minorities can change that. |
Quote:
|
I think there may be fewer problems if people ceased forcing their sexual preferences on other people*. I, and I'm sure the vast majority of people, don't care what others do, who they love, who they sleep with, and I in turn expect other people not to take interest in my own sex life. Love who you love... and bollox to anyone who doesn't approve.
I was going to say "stop forcing it down other people's throats" but edited myself for the sake of decency. You're welcome. |
Anyone being reasonable can see my point.
Heterosexuality-reproduction continues the human race and anything more than a binary sexual distinction (hetero-and-homosexual) seems less a biological truth than unnecessary labelling. I don’t expect Withano to see the obvious when he’s blinded by this pansexuality of a thing but there’s nothing mad about what I said up there. |
Quote:
But yes, in a nutshell really |
Quote:
Otherwise the dialogue would be ‘I think your sexuality is fake’ ‘Well I cant respond, dont wanna force it on ya’ Thats a bad dayfor everybody |
Quote:
It does seem like that is what you’re suggesting, which is why I found it humorous. Pan people will still reproduce, if they want to... just like heteros.. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Honestly if you don't understand it it becomes more of a case of just accepting it and moving on. This isn't a case of 'modern PC gone mad', 'pansexuality' has been around since at least the 1900s.
There are plenty of animals exhibiting homosexual behaviour too. And bisexuals/the godforbidden pansexuals are more than capable of reproducing -shocker- Quote:
But yes drag me Cherie :clap1: |
.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.